Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Comment on Proposed Updates to Preprint Services Directory: Request for Comments by ASAPbio

Дата публикации: 15-07-2026 17:00:19

In reply to <a href="https://asapbio.org/proposed-updates-to-preprint-services-directory-request-for-comments/#comment-45847">Jess H. Brewer</a>.
Thanks for your comment, Jess! We are ASAPbio, and our focus is indeed on life sciences. Our current directory includes many preprint servers that span multiple/all disciplines, as well as servers that focus on the life sciences narrowly. We know this directory has a broader audience than life science researchers only and want it to be as useful as possible for all. Therefore, we would welcome your feedback, and that of others from all around the research community.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

ASAPbio is planning a refresh of its Preprint Services Directory (https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers/). Since 2020, ASAPbio has maintained the directory on its website. A one-stop-shop for detailed information about life science preprint servers, the page is one of our most frequently visited sites.

As part of the refresh, we intend to narrow the features that we catalog to make the directory more focused and therefore more useful. The refreshed list will outline a smaller set of core features using a systematic and constrained set of descriptors. This will make it easier for researchers and other stakeholders to understand key differences between preprint servers at a glance.

We are seeking public feedback on the set of core features that we plan to evaluate. Ideally, this set of features fully encompasses fundamental characteristics that define a preprint server. These core characteristics are the ones that researchers and other stakeholders must consider when selecting which preprint servers to post to and otherwise support. Our proposed core characteristics are as follows:

Domain

Description

Levels

Reader access

Preprints are free to read without barriers or restrictions.

No
Yes

API availability

Preprints and their metadata are accessible to machines via an API.

No
Yes

Free to publish

Preprints are free to publish.

No
Yes

CC-BY licensing

Preprints are clearly licensed under a CC-BY license (or CC0 public domain dedication).

CC-BY license not available
CC-BY license available
CC-BY license required

Author copyright

Authors retain their copyright to a preprint.

No
Yes

Persistent identifiers

Each preprint is issued a persistent identifier such as a DOI.

No
Yes, same DOI for all versions
Yes, different DOI for each version

Versioning

Authors can freely version their preprints as their contents evolve.

No
By request
Yes

Metadata practices

The server maintains an informative metadata record for each preprint and makes this metadata openly available, for example by depositing the metadata to Crossref or DataCite.

No
Yes

Server governance

Researchers and other community stakeholders are meaningfully involved in server governance.

No
Yes

Open source platform

The platform on which the server is hosted is open source.

No
Yes

Non-profit owner

The owner of the server is a non-profit entity.

No
Yes

Preservation

Preprints are maintained as a permanent part of the scholarly record under a clear preservation policy.

No
Yes

Withdrawal and removal

Preprints are only withdrawn or removed under clear and very limited conditions detailed in a withdrawal and removal policy.

No
Yes

Moderation and scope

The server maintains clear policies on the scope of preprints it publishes and how those preprints are moderated before posting.

No
Yes

We especially welcome feedback on the following questions:

  1. Does the proposed set of features fully describe the core characteristics of a preprint server? Are any features missing or unnecessary?
  2. Are there any improvements that could be made to the set of features that would make the Preprint Services Directory more useful for researchers, research performing organizations, funders, and other stakeholders?
  3. Are there features we ought to catalog that go beyond these core characteristics that would be of use to the community?

We welcome public comments here on our blog, as well as private comments, which can be emailed to [email protected]. It is also possible to mark up our draft here. For best consideration, please submit comments by August 9, 2026. Following consultation with the preprint server community, we will launch the refreshed directory later this fall.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1JSTOR upholds 100% ASPIRE Gold rating for accessibility statement010.9305-03-2026
2The University of Wyoming moves to JSTOR Digital Stewardship Services to manage, preserve, and share digital collections04.8209-02-2026
3Assumption University selects JSTOR Digital Stewardship Services to manage, preserve, and share digital collections04.5511-02-2026
4The costs and benefits of research grant funding peer review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]07.0524-06-2026
5 Comment on Clarivate removes hold on mega-journal Heliyon after internal audit, 650+ retractions by Chris Mebane 08.8808-08-2026
6Критерий добросовестности: учёные предложили создать единый реестр ретракций5730-06-2026
7Минобрнауки отметило сложность создания списка направлений с регулированием приема0015-05-2025
8Эксперты литературной премии им. Арсеньева рассматривают введение новых номинаций0028-05-2021
9АСИ предложило нормативно закрепить определение молодого ученого0017-09-2025

Классификация: Наука. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5.68. Источник: asapbio.org.