Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Comment on Clarivate removes hold on mega-journal Heliyon after internal audit, 650+ retractions by Chris Mebane

Дата публикации: 08-08-2026 12:54:09

Curious that Clarivate’s Web of Science has made a number of high profile delisting of journals that need to clean up their acts, but all quiet from Scopus. If Elsevier’s Scopus does the same, it’s gotten much less press. Some prominent journals placed on hold or delisted from WoS seemed unscathed in Scopus- Environmental Science and Pollution Research ,Science of the Total Environment, Chemosphere, Heliyon.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Clarivate has lifted its hold on Heliyon after the journal’s internal audit led to over 1,000 retractions, expressions of concern and corrections. As a result, the journal will receive an impact factor in the coming cycle, a Clarivate spokesperson said. 

Clarivate decided in September 2024 new content from Heliyon would not be indexed in its Web of Science due to concerns about quality. The journal told us at the time it was “investigating,” and since then, it has retracted over 650 articles.

Clarivate lifted the hold on May 14, and Heliyon released a statement shortly after, noting all content published while the journal was on hold will now be indexed. The statement says the audit “revealed behaviors that did not align with our policies.” As we wrote in February, the journal has previously said the concerning practices included compromised peer review, authorship irregularities, tortured phrases and citation manipulation. 

Rebecca Krahenbuhl, communications manager at Clarivate, told us since all Heliyon’s missing content was backfilled by the August 1 cutoff, it will receive a new impact factor and updated metrics in the October Journal Citation Reports update.

Being indexed in major databases is seen as a marker of credibility for journals, and some universities and governments create lists of approved journals based on indexes. Authors are less likely to submit to delisted journals, given universities rely on such metrics to judge researchers’ work for promotion and tenure decisions. 

The journal issued roughly 1,100 “corrections to the record” which include article corrections, expressions of concern and retractions, which the statement said “affect approximately 3% of content published in Heliyon across 12 years of publication.” 

Queen Muse, head of media and communications at Cell Press, told us the 1,197 updates to the scientific record consisted of 687 retractions, 80 expressions of concern, two withdrawals, three removals, 317 corrigenda and 108 editor’s notes. 

Heliyon “considers research from all areas of the physical, applied, life, social and medical sciences,” according to its website. The journal published over 11,000 and 17,000 articles in 2023 and 2024, respectively. That number dropped to around 3,000 articles last year. So far in 2026, the journal has published over 500 research papers and case reports. 

Amy Bourke-Waite, senior director of communications at Clarivate, told us the company would not comment on specific journals, but referred us to an April blog post by Nandita Quaderi, editor-in-chief of Web of Science. In it, Quaderi noted Clarivate expects publishers to “proactively correct the scholarly record when unreliable content is identified, and to continue these efforts even after a hold is removed.”

Moving forward, Heliyon will “continue to make improvements to the journal’s workflow, including the use of our Check Integrity screening tool with human oversight to help prevent ethical issues in submitted papers, and throughout the publication process,” the May statement reads. “The outcomes of the investigation reflect a systematic effort to correct the scientific record and reinforce trust in the journal’s content.”


Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on X or Bluesky, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].


Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1 Comment on High-profile anesthesiologists earning retractions for data, image problems by Chris Mebane 07.4408-08-2026
2Federal lawsuit accuses four major publishers of extorting article processing charges08.1531-07-2026
3 Comment on Retraction Watch story exposing research factory fuels investigations, preprint withdrawals, termination by HW 07.908-08-2026
4 SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic and their giga-IPO dreams 0516-12-2025
5Large Publishers Strongly Considering Blocking Google Search Completely05.0223-07-2026
6How we used AI to extract citation data from conference posters05.2505-03-2026
7 Comment on Weekend reads: Second gene editing death in China reported; Jason Arday’s resignation from Cambridge; Retraction Watch’s sweet 16 by Sylvain B. 010.9710-08-2026
8A Year in Discovery: The Top 10 Standout Publications of 2025 013.9124-02-2026
9New Funding Cuts Forcing U.S. Researchers Out of Antarctica07.4315-04-2025
10 Sloponomics: who wins and loses in the AI-content flood? 2716-10-2025

Классификация: Мнения. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 8.88. Источник: retractionwatch.com.