Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

The Ensemble Learning to Determine Optimal Tuning Parameter of the Generalized Lasso in Spatial Clustering Analysis

Дата публикации: 22-07-2026 00:00:00

Spatial clustering is important for identifying regions with similar spatial patterns in spatial datasets. This study focuses on selecting the optimal tuning parameter for the generalized lasso in spatial clustering analysis. Common approaches for selecting the tuning parameter in the generalized lasso include generalized cross-validation (GCV) and approximate leave-one-out cross-validation (ALOCV). However, these methods often produce substantially different tuning parameter values, which may lead to inconsistent clustering results and misinterpretation. In general, ALOCV tends to select larger tuning parameters, whereas GCV tends to select smaller ones. To address this issue, we propose an ensemble learning cross-validation (ELCV) approach that combines the validation errors from ALOCV and GCV using arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic means to obtain a more balanced tuning parameter selection. In addition, an analytical justification of the proposed ensemble framework is provided to demonstrate its theoretical relationship with ALOCV and GCV. A simulation study was conducted under four spatial clustering scenarios, namely three separated clusters, three connected clusters, five separated clusters, and five connected clusters, combined with three noise standard deviation levels to evaluate the robustness of the proposed methods. The Index of Edge Detection Accuracy (IEDA) was used as the primary criterion for assessing clustering performance. The simulation results showed that the proposed methods based on the geometric mean, and the harmonic mean, consistently achieved better and more stable performance across different scenarios and noise levels, as indicated by higher IEDA values and lower estimation errors compared to ALOCV and GCV. Finally, the proposed methods were applied to cluster the productivity of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFB) across several planting blocks in oil palm concessions in Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Abstract

Spatial clustering is important for identifying regions with similar spatial patterns in spatial datasets. This study focuses on selecting the optimal tuning parameter for the generalized lasso in spatial clustering analysis. Common approaches for selecting the tuning parameter in the generalized lasso include generalized cross-validation (GCV) and approximate leave-one-out cross-validation (ALOCV). However, these methods often produce substantially different tuning parameter values, which may lead to inconsistent clustering results and misinterpretation. In general, ALOCV tends to select larger tuning parameters, whereas GCV tends to select smaller ones. To address this issue, we propose an ensemble learning cross-validation (ELCV) approach that combines the validation errors from ALOCV and GCV using arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic means to obtain a more balanced tuning parameter selection. In addition, an analytical justification of the proposed ensemble framework is provided to demonstrate its theoretical relationship with ALOCV and GCV. A simulation study was conducted under four spatial clustering scenarios, namely three separated clusters, three connected clusters, five separated clusters, and five connected clusters, combined with three noise standard deviation levels to evaluate the robustness of the proposed methods. The Index of Edge Detection Accuracy (IEDA) was used as the primary criterion for assessing clustering performance. The simulation results showed that the proposed methods based on the geometric mean, and the harmonic mean, consistently achieved better and more stable performance across different scenarios and noise levels, as indicated by higher IEDA values and lower estimation errors compared to ALOCV and GCV. Finally, the proposed methods were applied to cluster the productivity of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFB) across several planting blocks in oil palm concessions in Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans
Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
  1. Arlot S, and Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures. Stat Surv, 4, 40–79. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0907.4728

  2. Arnold TB, Tibshirani RJ (2016) Efficient implementations of the generalized lasso dual path algorithm. J Comput Graph Stat 25(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2015.1008638

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2015) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman and Hall/CRC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craven P, Wahba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions (Estimating the Correct Degree of Smoothing by the Method of Generalized Cross-Validation). Numer Math 31:377–403

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietterich TG (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. Multiple classifier systems. Springer, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer MM, Getis A (2010) Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfand AE, Kim H-J, Sirmans CF, Banerjee S (2003) Spatial modeling with spatially varying coefficient processes. J Am Stat Assoc 98(462):387–396. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214503000170

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R (1992) Neural networks and the bias-variance dilemma. Neural Comput 4:1–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Golub GH, Heath M, Ruskeep D (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21(2):215–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268518

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen LK, Salamon P (1990) Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(10):993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurnia A, Rahardiantoro S, Oktarina SD, Anisa R, Rahman NAN, and Handayani D (2024) Modified generalized lasso for variable selection in lag distributed modeling of fresh fruit bunch production from oil palm plantations in Riau-Indonesia. Int J Adv Soft Compu Appl 16 (1), 1–17. IJASCA.240330.01

  16. Oktarina SD, Nurkhoiry R, Pradiko I (2021) The effect of climate change to palm oil price dynamics: a supply and demand model. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 782(3):032062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/782/3/032062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rad KR, and Maleki A (2018) A scalable estimate of the extra-sample prediction error via approximate leave-one-out

  18. Rad KR, Zhou W, and Maleki A (2020) Error bounds in estimating the out-of-sample prediction error using leave-one-out cross validation in high-dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 108

  19. Rahardiantoro S (2023) Extension of the generalized lasso application in the spatial data analysis. (Dissertation)

  20. Rahardiantoro S, Sakamoto W (2021) Clustering regions based on socio-economic factors which affected the number of COVID-19 cases in Java Island. J Phys Conf Ser 1863(1):012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahardiantoro S, Sakamoto W (2022) Optimum tuning parameter selection in generalized lasso for clustering with spatially varying coefficient models. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 950(1):012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/950/1/012093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahardiantoro S, Sakamoto W (2024) Spatio-temporal clustering analysis using generalized lasso with an application to reveal the spread of Covid-19 cases in Japan. Comput Stat 39:1513–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-023-01331-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahardiantoro S, Oktarina SD, Kurnia A, Maharani NS, Juhanda AR (2024) Spatio-temporal clustering using generalized lasso to identify the spread of Covid-19 in Indonesia according to provincial flight route-based connections. Spat Stat 1(63):100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100857

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahardiantoro S, Juhanda ARN, Kurnia A, Aswi A, Sartono B, Handayani D, Soleh AM, Yanti Y, Cramb S (2024) Spatio-temporal modeling to identify factors associated with stunting in Indonesia using a modified generalized lasso. Spat Spatio-temporal Epidemiol 51:100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2024.100694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahardiantoro S, Darajati A, Wijayanto H, Kurnia A (2026) A spatial approach to correlated high- dimensional stunting data in Indonesia using a modified generalized lasso. Int J Adv Soft Compu Appl 18(1):304–320. https://doi.org/10.15849/ijasca.v18i1.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 36(2):111–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Tibshirani, R.J., Taylor, J., 2011. The solution path of the generalized lasso. Ann. Statis. 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOS878.

  28. Tiefelsdorf M, Boots BN (2004) Analyzing spatial structure: a practical guide to the analysis of spatial data. SAGE Publications

    Google Scholar 

  29. van Erven T, Harremos P (2014) Rényi divergence and Kullback-Leibler divergence. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 60(7):3797–3820. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2014.2320500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S, Zhou W, Maleki A, Lu H, and Mirrokni V (2018) Approximate leave-one-out for high- dimensional non-differentiable learning problems. arXiv:1810.02716

  31. Zhao Y, Bondell H (2020) Solution paths for the generalized lasso with applications to spatially varying coefficients regression. Comput Stat Data Anal 142:106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2019.106821

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou ZH (2012) Ensemble methods: foundations and algorithms. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12207

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information
Authors and Affiliations
  1. Program in Statistics and Data Science, School of Data Science, Mathematics, and Informatics, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

    Septian Rahardiantoro, Sachnaz Desta Oktarina, Gerry Alfa Dito, Indahwati Indahwati & Anang Kurnia

  2. Program in Statistics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Dian Handayani

Authors

  1. Septian Rahardiantoro
  2. Sachnaz Desta Oktarina
  3. Gerry Alfa Dito
  4. Indahwati Indahwati
  5. Dian Handayani
  6. Anang Kurnia
Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Septian Rahardiantoro or Anang Kurnia.

Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest

This research is supported by The Directorate General of Higher Education, Research and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology the Republic of Indonesia based on contract number 027/E5/PG.02.00.PL/2024 for the Fundamental Research schema. This research was also supported by the IPB University research grant “Penelitian Dosen Muda” 2024 under Contract Number 23445/IT3/PT.01.03/P/B/2024.

Additional information
Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahardiantoro, S., Oktarina, S.D., Dito, G.A. et al. The Ensemble Learning to Determine Optimal Tuning Parameter of the Generalized Lasso in Spatial Clustering Analysis. J Stat Theory Pract 20, 102 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-026-00627-7

Download citation

  • Received: 15 April 2025

  • Accepted: 11 July 2026

  • Published: 22 July 2026

  • Version of record: 22 July 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-026-00627-7

Keywords

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Group LASSO for multiple change-point detection in a generalized integer-valued autoregressive model09.1824-07-2026
2An adaptive triple-shrinkage framework for linear models with oracle properties08.8221-07-2026
3Modelling non-stationary extremal dependence through a geometric approach05.8324-07-2026
4Novel fast and asymptotically efficient estimation in weighted exponential family06.0622-07-2026
5Emulated FPE Order Identification for Autoregressive Models of Big Multivariate Time Series07.722-07-2026
6Covariate-dependent Kato–Jones mixtures with an explicit uniform background for wind-direction regimes08.0222-07-2026
7Objective Bayesian Analysis for the Generalized Logistic Distribution04.7422-07-2026
8Systems Forecasting By-Parts: A Study on Fed Beef Production0715-07-2026
9How Economic News Drives Implied Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Markets0713-07-2026
10Quantile adaptive feature screening for ultra-high dimensional longitudinal heterogeneous data08.9824-07-2026

Классификация: Пресс-релизы. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5.1. Источник: link.springer.com.