Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager detection performances

Дата публикации: 20-10-2026 08:00:00






Lightning is a vital meteorological indicator, an Essential Climate Variable, and a key factor in atmospheric chemistry. EUMETSAT’s Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager (MTG-LI), operational since July 2024, is Europe’s first space-based geostationary lightning location system devoted to lightning diagnosis and characterization. This manuscript assesses its performance over 18 months, serving as a foundational reference for users.



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Aich, V., Holzworth, R., Goodman, S. J., Kuleshov, Y., Price, C., and Williams, E.: Lightning: A new essential climate variable, EOS, 99, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO104583, 2018. a

Albrecht, R. I., Goodman, S. J., Buechler, D. E., Blakeslee, R. J., and Christian, H. J.: Where Are the Lightning Hotspots on Earth?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 2051–2068, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00193.1, 2016. a

Ashley, W. S. and Gilson, C. W.: A reassessment of U.S. lightning mortality, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1501–1518, 2009. a

Bateman, M., Mach, D., and Stock, M.: Further Investigation Into Detection Efficiency and False Alarm Rate for the Geostationary Lightning Mappers Aboard GOES-16 and GOES-17, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001237, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001237, 2021. a, b

Bitzer, P. M., Burchfield, J. C., and Christian, H. J.: A Bayesian approach to assess the performance of lightning detection systems, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 33, 563–578, 2016. a

Bližňák, V. and Sokol, Z.: First validation of the Lightning Imager aboard Meteosat Third Generation satellite with Earth Networks Total Lightning Network, I. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinfo., 147, 105205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105205, 2026. a

Boccippio, D. J., Goodman, S. J., and Heckman, S.: Regional Differences in Tropical Lightning Distributions, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 2231–2248, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2231:RDITLD>2.0.CO;2, 2000a. a

Boccippio, D. J., Koshak, W. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Christian, H. J., Goodman, S. J., and Hall, J. M.: Performance Assessment of the Optical Transient Detector and Lightning Imaging Sensor. Part I: Predicted Diurnal Variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3264–3275, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<1318:PAOTOT>2.0.CO;2, 2000b. a

Boccippio, D. J., Cummins, K. L., Christian, H. J., and Goodman, S. J.: Combined satellite-and surface-based estimation of the intracloud–cloud-to-ground lightning ratio over the continental United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 108–122, 2001. a

Boccippio, D. J., Koshak, W., Blakeslee, R., Boeck, W. L., Mach, D., Goodman, S., and Christian, H. J.: Performance assessment of the Optical Transient Detector and Lightning Imaging Sensor. Part I: Predicted diurnal variability, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 1318–1332, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<1318:PAOTOT>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a

Bozzo, A., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Jackson, J., Spezzi, L., Lattanzio, A., and Watts, P. D.: First Release of the Optimal Cloud Analysis Climate Data Record from the EUMETSAT SEVIRI Measurements 2004–2019, Remote Sens., 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162989, 2024. a

Branick, M. L. and Doswell, Charles A., I.: An Observation of the Relationship between Supercell Structure and Lightning Ground-Strike Polarity, Weather Forecast., 7, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1992)007<0143:AOOTRB>2.0.CO;2, 1992. a

Cao, L., Wang, Q., Wu, L., Lu, Q., and Zhang, P.: Fengyun meteorological satellite products for earth system science, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0425-3, 2021. a, b

Cecil, D. J., Goodman, S. J., Boccippio, D. J., Zipser, E. J., and Nesbitt, S. W.: Three Years of TRMM Precipitation Features. Part I: Radar, Radiometric, and Lightning Characteristics, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 543–566, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2876.1, 2005. a

Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., and Blakeslee, R. J.: Gridded lightning climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: Dataset description, Atmos. Res., 135–136, 404–414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028, 2014. a

Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., Lang, T. J., Virts, K. S., and Mach, D. M.: Lightning Climatology Datasets from TRMM LIS, ISS LIS, and OTD, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 65, 51–72, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-25-0110.1, 2026. a

Chameides, W. L.: The role of lightning in the chemistry of the atmosphere, in: The Earth's Electrical Environment, 70–77, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986. a

Chen, Z., Qie, X., Sun, J., Xiao, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, D., and Yang, J.: Evaluation of Fengyun-4A Lightning Mapping Imager (LMI) Performance during Multiple Convective Episodes over Beijing, Remote Sens., 13, 1746, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091746, 2021. a

Combarnous, P., Vernet, O., and Martet, M.: First-year observations from the Meteosat-12 Lightning Imager: flash properties and LI-FCI relationships, eSS Open Archive, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.176423548.85109006/v1, 2025. a, b, c, d, e

Cummins, K. L. and Murphy, M. J.: An overview of lightning locating systems: History, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the U.S. NLDN, IEEE T. Electromagn. C., 51, 499–518, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2009.2023450, 2009. a, b, c, d

Djalel, D., Meghni, B., and Labar, H.: Study of the lightning impact on the wind-turbine, Energy Res. J., 5, 17–25, https://doi.org/10.3844/erjsp.2014.17.25, 2014. a

Enno, S.-E., Viticchié, B., Navia, D., and Grandell, J.: First Year of Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager Observations, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3386, 2026. a, b, c, d

Erdmann, F., Defer, E., Caumont, O., Blakeslee, R. J., Pédeboy, S., and Coquillat, S.: Concurrent satellite and ground-based lightning observations from the Optical Lightning Imaging Sensor (ISS-LIS), the low-frequency network Meteorage and the SAETTA Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) in the northwestern Mediterranean region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 853–875, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-853-2020, 2020. a

EUMETSAT: MTG LI Level 2 Data Guide, EUMETSAT User Portal, https://user.eumetsat.int/resources/user-guides/mtg-li-level-2-data-guide (last access: 20 March 2026), 2026. a, b, c

Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., and Abraham, N. L.: The impact of lightning on tropospheric ozone chemistry using a new global lightning parametrisation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7507–7522, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7507-2016, 2016. a

Gatlin, P. N. and Goodman, S. J.: A Total Lightning Trending Algorithm to Identify Severe Thunderstorms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 3–20, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1286.1, 2010. a

Goodman, S. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Koshak, W. J., Mach, D., Bailey, J., Buechler, D., Carey, L., Christian, H., Doswell, C., Fedor, J., McCaul, E., Peterson, W., Rudlosky, S., Squires, K., Kuhlman, K., and Mauzey, C.: The GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM), Atmos. Res., 125, 34–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.01.006, 2013. a, b

Grebović, S., Akšamović, A., Filipović-Grčić, B., and Konjicija, S.: Investigation of lightning effects on solar power plants connected to transmission networks, Electr. Pow. Syst. Res., 238, 1108240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2025.112217, 2025. a

Hilburn, K. A., Kummerow, C. D., and de Graaf, I. A. M.: Development and Interpretation of a Neural-Network-Based Synthetic Radar Reflectivity Estimator Using GOES-R Satellite Observations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 60, 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0084.1, 2021. a

Holmlund, K., Grandell, J., Schmetz, J., Stuhlmann, R., Bojkov, B., Munro, R., Lekouara, M., Coppens, D., Viticchie, B., August, T., Theodore, B., Watts, P., Dobber, M., Fowler, G., Bojinski, S., Schmid, A., Salonen, K., Tjemkes, S., Aminou, D., and Blythe, P.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG): Continuation and Innovation of Observations from Geostationary Orbit, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E990–E1015, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1, 2021. a, b

Holmlund, K., Counet, P., Fadrique, F. M., Schmid, A., Bojkov, B., Munro, R., Grandell, J., and Obligis, E.: The EUMETSAT satellite programmes and data services, J. Eur. Meteorol. Soc., 2, 100005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2024.100005, 2025. a

Kaplan, J. O. and Lau, K. H.-K.: The WGLC global gridded lightning climatology and time series, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3219–3237, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021, 2021. a

Kokou, P., Willemsen, P., Lekouara, M., Arioua, M., Mora, A., Van den Braembussche, P., Neri, E., and Aminou, D. M. A.: Algorithmic Chain for Lightning Detection and False Event Filtering Based on the MTG Lightning Imager, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 56, 5115–5124, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2808965, 2018. a

Koshak, W. J. and Solakiewicz, R. J.: A Method for Retrieving the Ground Flash Fraction and Flash Type from Satellite Lightning Mapper Observations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 79–96, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-14-00085.1, 2015. a

Liaskos, C. et al.: Sensitivity of tropical tropospheric composition to lightning NOx, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8512–8531, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022987, 2015. a

Lyons, W. A. and Keen, C. S.: Observations of Lightning in Convective Supercells within Tropical Storms and Hurricanes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 1897–1916, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<1897:OOLICS>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a

MacGorman, D. R. and Nielsen, K. E.: Cloud-to-ground lightning in a tornadic storm on 8 May 1986, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 1557–1574, 1991. a

MacGorman, D. R., Burgess, D. W., Mazur, V., and Rust, W. D.: Lightning and severe weather: A comparison between total and cloud-to-ground lightning trends, in: Preprints, 12th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, 568–573, American Meteorological Society, 1989. a, b

Mach, D. M.: Geostationary Lightning Mapper Clustering Algorithm Stability, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031900, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031900, 2020. a

Mäkelä, A., Jääskeläinen, S., and Kotro, J.: MTG Lightning Imager usability from a high-latitude perspective, 12th European Conference on Severe Storms, ECSS2025-104, 17–21 November 2025, Utrecht, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-104, 2025. a

Marlton, G., Hare, B., Scholten, O., Protts, M., Stone, E., Twelves, S., and Devoto, F.: Mapping out lightning processes in both the VHF and VLF using LOFAR and the Met Office’s lightning detection system, LEELA, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11101, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11101, 2024. a

Mitchard, C., Smith, S., Edwards, A., and Mitchell, P.: Investigation of lightning direct effects on aircraft materials, Proceedings of the International Conference on Lightning and Static Electricity, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/102939/1/102939 - Investigation of lightning ...pdf (last access: 14 October 2026), 2016. a

Montanyà, J., Van der Velde, O., Pineda, N., López, J. A., Romero, D., Solà, G., Arcanjo, M., Defer, E., Vázquez, F. G., Viticchié, B., and Enno, S.-E.: METEOSAT-12 Lightning Imager detection efficiency assessment by means of the Lightning Mapping Array in its first year of dissemination, Atmos. Meas. Tech., in preparation, 2026. a

Murphy, M. J. and Said, R. K.: Comparisons of Lightning Rates and Properties From the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) and GLD360 With GOES-16 Geostationary Lightning Mapper and Advanced Baseline Imager Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031172, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031172, 2020. a

Murray, L. T.: Lightning NOx and Impacts on Air Quality, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 2, 115–133, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0031-7, 2016. a

Mäkelä, A., Mäkelä, J., Haapalainen, J., and Porjo, N.: The verification of lightning location accuracy in Finland deduced from lightning strikes to trees, Atmos. Res., 172–173, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.12.009, 2016. a

Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., van der Velde, O., Montanyá, J., López Trujillo, J. A., Pineda, N., Huntrieser, H., Valks, P., Loyola, D., Seo, S., and Erbertseder, T.: Lightning-produced nitrogen oxides per flash length obtained by using TROPOMI observations and the Ebro Lightning Mapping Array, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104699, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104699, 2023. a

Pohjola, H. and Mäkelä, A.: The Comparison of GLD360 and EUCLID Lightning Location Systems in Europe, Atmos. Res., 123, 117–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.10.019, 2013. a

Price, C. and Rind, D.: Possible implications of global climate change on global lightning distributions and frequencies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 10823–10831, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00019, 1994. a

Rakov, V. A. and Uman, M. A.: Electrical Structure of Lightning-Producing Clouds, in: Lightning: Physics and Effects, Cambridge University Press, Chap. 3, 67–107, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340886.004, 2003. a

Reeve, N. and Toumi, R.: Lightning activity as an indicator of climate change, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 893–903, 1999. a

Rison, W., Thomas, R. J., Krehbiel, P. R., Hamlin, T., and Harlin, J.: A GPS‐based three‐dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial observations in central New Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3573–3576, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010856, 1999. a, b

Rudlosky, S. D. and Virts, K. S.: Dual Geostationary Lightning Mapper Observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 149, 979–992, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0242.1, 2021. a, b

Rudlosky, S. D., Virts, K. S., Kolek, M. J., Bruning, E. C., Lojewski, S. J., and Magsig, M. A.: Initial Geostationary Lightning Mapper Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1097–1104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081052, 2019. a, b, c

Said, R. K. and Murphy, M. J.: GLD360 Upgrade: Performance Analysis and Applications, in: 24th International Lightning Detection Conference/Sixth International Lightning Meteorology Conference, Vaisala, San Diego, CA, https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/Ryan Said and Martin Murphy. GLD360 Upgrade Performance Analysis and Applications.pdf (last access: 12 October 2026), 2016. a, b

Said, R. K., Cohen, M. B., and Inan, U. S.: Highly intense lightning over the oceans: Estimated peak currents from global GLD360 observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6905–6915, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50508, 2013. a, b, c

Schultz, C. J., Petersen, W. A., and Carey, L. D.: Preliminary Development and Evaluation of Lightning Jump Algorithms for the Real-Time Detection of Severe Weather, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 48, 2543–2563, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2237.1, 2009. a

Schultz, C. J., Petersen, W. A., and Carey, L. D.: Lightning and severe weather: A comparison between total and cloud-to-ground lightning trends, Weather Forecast., 26, 744–755, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-10-05026.1, 2011.  a

Schulz, W., Diendorfer, G., Pedeboy, S., and Poelman, D. R.: The European lightning location system EUCLID – Part 1: Performance analysis and validation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 595–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-595-2016, 2016. a, b, c

Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007, 2007. a

Shafer, M. A., MacGorman, D. R., and Carr, F. H.: Cloud-to-Ground Lightning throughout the Lifetime of a Severe Storm System in Oklahoma, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1798–1815, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1798:CTGLTT>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a

Van der Velde, O., Montanya, J., Rison, W., Aulich, G., Pineda, N., Soula, S., Romero, D., Rico, R., and Reglero, V.: First results of the Ebro Delta Lightning Mapping Array, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, AE33A-0290, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFMAE33A0290V (last access: 12 October 2026), 2011. a

Virts, K. S. and Koshak, W. J.: Mitigation of Geostationary Lightning Mapper Geolocation Errors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 37, 1673–1686, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0100.1, 2020. a, b

Virts, K. S. and Koshak, W. J.: Bayesian analysis of the detection performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 42, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-24-0130.1, 2025. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j

Williams, E., Boldi, B., Matlin, A., Weber, M., Hodanish, S., Sharp, D., Goodman, S., Raghavan, R., and Buechler, D.: The behavior of total lightning activity in severe Florida thunderstorms, Atmos. Res., 51, 245–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00011-3, 1999. a

Zhu, Y., Lyu, W., Cramer, J., Rakov, V., Bitzer, P., and Ding, Z.: Analysis of Location Errors of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network Using Lightning Strikes to Towers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032530, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032530, 2020. a

Zhu, Y., Stock, M., Lapierre, J., and DiGangi, E.: Upgrades of the Earth Networks Total Lightning Network in 2021, Remote Sensing, 14, 2209, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092209 2022. a

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1First year of Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager observations010.222-10-2026
2Европейское космическое агентство (ESA) 19 августа провело предстартовый брифинг для ...011.7819-08-2026
3Replay: MTG-I2 pre-launch media briefing010.4419-08-2026
4Ariane 6 launch with MTG-I2 – highlights016.7128-08-2026
5MTG-I2 completes Europe’s latest weather trio014.2627-08-2026
6Un nouveau satellite pour anticiper les catastrophes météorologiques5812-06-2026
7From manual classification to transformer-based language models: assessing the quality and consistency of historical convective event records011.3207-10-2026
8The team behind Europe’s latest weather satellite09.1106-08-2026
9Call for interest: MTG-I2 launch media programme at Europe’s Spaceport 08.7502-07-2026
10VIDEO: Meteosat-12 imagery over Europe and Africa made available via YouTube streams09.5419-05-2026

Классификация: Наука. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 12.11. Источник: www.egu.eu.