Thanks for sharing. For empirical market-microstructure work, one distinction I take from your taxonomy is between execution-mediated price revision and separately updateable pricing state. In a passive Uniswap v3 pool, absent a swap, the native pool price does not move, whereas a PropAMM maker can revise its pricing parameters without an executed user trade.
Would you view those oracle/parameter updates as a quote-revision channel? And on Ethereum, is there a reasonably protocol-agnostic onchain way to identify those updates separately from user takes across current PropAMMs?
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Designs for EVM gas accounting in EIP-7999 | 0 | 4.9 | 08-09-2026 |
| 2 | Letting the base fee be a midpoint: a temporal liquidity authorization for EIP-1559 | 0 | 6.38 | 10-09-2026 |
| 3 | Post-Glamsterdam One-dimensional Fee Market and Comparison with EIP-7999 | 0 | 13.47 | 22-09-2026 |
| 4 | When Data Binds Execution: Dynamic Simulation of EIP-7999’s Multidimensional Fee Market | 0 | 10.98 | 16-09-2026 |
| 5 | Bloom Filters And Keyed Nonces | 0 | 8.23 | 08-09-2026 |
| 6 | From 60M to 200M: simulating Glamsterdam’s fee market | 0 | 7.26 | 16-09-2026 |
| 7 | Evidence Review Framework for Project Applications in Decentralized Guilds/Agent Systems | 0 | 8 | 19-09-2026 |
| 8 | EIP-7906: Transaction Assertions via State Diff Opcode | 0 | 3 | 08-07-2026 |
| 9 | EIP-7906: Transaction Assertions via State Diff Opcode | 0 | 7 | 09-07-2026 |