The predominant insightful custom in African frontier investigations deals with porousness as a governance shortfall frontier are vulnerable because of manpower, high technology, and framework to execute them (Herbst, 2000; Englebert et al., 2002). The strategy script that pursue from this framing is capacity development more border patrol agents, improved equipment, more resilient. While this surrounding apprehend mere thought, it insufficiently theories the social direction of trans-border administration. Paasi (2009) asserts that territorial limits are lived experience that societies constantly replicate and challenge, moreover not solely organizational artifacts that states predicts. Newman (2006) likewise illustrate that the binary of open versus closed frontiers misrepresents the contrast and stratified pattern in which people actually experience boundary regimes. For communities straddling the Nigeria-Niger border, the imposed frontiers of 1906 did not obstruct the cultural, commercial, and lineage fabric that had establish across the territory for centuries; as a repercussion, day to day cross-border mobility has endured as a social norm with chronicled lawfulness rather than as a defiance of state sovereignty (Donnan & Wilson, 2010). recently studies has produce complicated governance deficit model by identifying non-state control architecture operating in the area typically described as ungoverned. Raeymaekers et al. (2008) and Menkhaus (2010) illustrated that what appears as absent governance is regularly alternative governance, organized through local chiefs, market associations, and armed groups rather than through formal state structure. In the Lake Chad borders, ISWAP has demonstrated the capacity to provide quasi-governmental role including dispute resolution, taxation and norm enforcement in areas where Nigerian and the Niger Republic presence is intermittent (Matfess, 2017.

simultaneously, this body of research has significantly advanced understanding of insurgent ideology, organizational origin, financing, governance ambitions, and intra-factional conflict within the Lake Chad Basin.

In spite of these crucial contributions, yet two structural gaps remain relevant to the current study. First, the existing literature tires to treat the border as a contextual backdrop rather than as an active area of discourse whose particular attributes shape insurgent conversation and functioning potency. Researches investigate trans boundary dynamics excessively centralize on the Lake Chad Basin, Sambisa Forest, Maiduguri, and the broader conflict landscape of Borno State, where Boko Haram first emerged and where the highest military campaign and humanitarian involvements have been conducted (Matfess, 2017; Thurston, 2020). however this geographical prominence is understandable because these areas have witnessed the highest levels of ferocity and accordingly entice the greatest concern from governments,, researchers and humanitarian agencies. However, this concentration has intend that earthly border corridors linking Diffa Region of Niger Republic with Yobe State in Nigeria have received relatively little systematic scholarly focus despite their rising functional relevance.

The limited attention devoted to these corridors also reflects important methodological constraints. Much of the available conflict evidence is organised at state or regional levels, while persistent insecurity and restricted access have made sustained research in remote borderlands particularly difficult. Therefore, border corridors are typically incorporated into broader regional analyses rather than look in to as distinct analytical units through which insurgent organisations sustain movement, logistics, recruitment, and illicit trade. As a result, the corridor-level mechanisms that facilitate insurgent resilience remain insufficiently theorized despite their strategic importance for understanding how armed groups adapt to evolving security environments.

The studies on illegal activities in the Sahel has rising significantly since collapse of Libya in 2011 which created what the Institute for Security Studies characterize as a safe heaven for arms trafficking emanating from Libya’s post-Gaddafi regime southward through Niger toward the Lake Chad Basin (ISS Africa, 2022). UNODC (2023) recorded a 105 percent increase in arms seizures in the Sahel between 2017 and 2021, with seizures in Agadez and Tahoua regions both in Niger Republic during January 2021 to February 2022 revealing both the scale of southward trafficking gush and the limitations of prohibition ability. Arms penetrating Niger Republic from the north follow a natural southeastward path toward the Diffa Region and the Nigeria-Niger border, where the Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa hallway constitute a downstream node in this trafficking (UNODC, 2023; ISS Africa, 2022).

Furthermore a preserving critical analysis defects in this study concerns the connection between licit and illicit mobility. Unofficial trans-border trade between Nigeria and Niger Republic constitutes the primary livelihood system for millions of people in the border area, with the OECD (2018) establishing that unrecorded trade across the Nigeria and Niger Republic border is high by regional standards. The UNDP (2022) trans-border trade assessment likewise documents that cross-boundary commerce in cattle, sesame, cow peas, sorghum, and millet constitutes a crucial subsistence pillar for border communities in spite of the continuing insecurity. The security challenge is not the existence of informal trade but the systematic difficulty of dis-aggregating threatening from non-threatening mobility within a trade system of this scale and combination of a problem that existing literature has not sufficiently theorized.

The institutional structure for Lake Chad Basin security collaboration is significant. The MNJTF, stimulated under the African Union authorization in 2015, documented at least 176 armed operations with Boko Haram factions between January 2015 and March 2024 (ACLED, 2024), and Operation Lake prudence, launched in 2022, achieved quantifiable outcomes in distort insurgent control over the territory on the Lake Chad islands. The Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC), established in 1964, provides the primary structure for collaborating political, developmental and Humanitarian responses.

However scholarly documents on the MNJTF is cogent in documenting a gap between institutional capacity and operational presentation. Adesoji (2020), Perouse de Montclos (2021), and International Crisis Group (2024) all spot domestic interest parting, insufficient intelligence sharing, and the tendency of participating states to prioritize regional self-protection over genuinely joint operations as preserving organizational constrain. Additionally Niger Republic withdrawal from March 2025 MNJTF lead to the removal of almost 1,000 plus troops from Sector Four of the Mission and eliminated multilateral surveillance of the Diffa hallway at a moment when ISWAP was expanding its operational cadence (ACLED, 2025) represents the most incidental recent illustration of these dynamics. SBM Intelligence (2025) characterize the development as evidence of the slow setback of collaborative security in the region’s most vulnerable zone.

Morever Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) is reagarded as the prime quantitative source which maintains a dereference, near-real-time database of protest and political voilence. ACLED data have been used to map the distribution and frequency of conflict events in Yobe State, Nigeria, and Niger’s Diffa Region between 2020 and 2025, with particular attention to events occurring within approximately 50 kilometres of the Garin-Gada--Maine-Soroa axis. Events are disaggregated by type battles, explosions and remote violence, violence against civilians, and strategic developments to enable analysis of how insurgent tactics in the corridor have evolved over the study period.

Displacement and population movement data are drawn from IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM), which publishes monthly dashboards for the Lake Chad Basin Crisis disaggregated by country and sub-region. As of April 2024, the four Lake Chad Basin states hosted an estimated 6,089,049 conflict-affected individuals, with Nigeria accounting for approximately 74 percent of that total, or roughly 4.5 million persons, and Niger’s Diffa Region -- the administrative unit encompassing Maine-Soroa accounting for approximately 9 percent of the regional figure, or roughly 559,000 persons (IOM, 2024). By February 2026, this regional total had grown to 6,488,974 (IOM, 2026). Additional quantitative sources include UNHCR’s Operational Data Portal for the Lake Chad Situation, LCBC institutional reports, and UNODC’s (2023) firearms trafficking analysis for the Sahel.

The qualitative analysis draws on a systematic review of secondary literature, grey literature from international organisations, and credible journalistic and analytical reporting on the Nigeria--Niger border zone. Primary sources consulted include reports from International Crisis Group, Institute for Security Studies Africa, Small Arms Survey, Human Rights Watch, Insecurity Insight, SBM Intelligence, and ACLED’s analytical publications. Particular weight is assigned to sources published between 2020 and 2025 containing primary data from the Diffa Region or Yobe State. Key informant testimony documented in published field assessments by international organisations and NGOs is used to ground structural arguments in field-level observation, while acknowledging that such testimony derives from secondary rather than primary fieldwork by the present authors. Primary field research at the Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa border points represents an important direction for future work.

The study adopts two complementary theoretical frameworks to analysis the concept. Borderlands theory, associated with Paasi (2009), Newman (2006), and Donnan and Wilson (2010), which provides the conceptual vocabulary for analysing the border as a social space in which state sovereignty is continuously negotiated rather than simply present or absent. This structure resists the reductive equation of porosity with state weakness and attends instead to the multiple overlapping authorities formal state,, insurgent, customary commercial that shape how the border is actually governed in reality.

Buzan and Waever’s (2003) Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) provides the macro-level frame for connecting corridor-level dynamics to the broader Lake Chad Basin security structure. RSCT post that security threats within regionally same zones are intrinsically interdependent, security threats in one state will definatly acquire regional features, and lack of political will or governance failures in one member state might eventually lead to security problems for all. RSCT appilication to the Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa borders explains why localized border governance deficits results to cascading consequences across the basin as a whole.

finding of this research is more concerns with the corridor’s operation as what the paper regards as a strategic mobility space: a zone in which the functional costs of armed group movement are stategically reduced by the interaction of difficult terrain, community social embedded, and institutional fragmentation. ACLED data for Diffa Region in Niger Republic record a sustained and expanding pattern of insurgent attacks in the Maine-Soroa area throughout the 2020 to 2025 study period. In April 2024, ISWAP fighters undertook a vehicle hijacking on the Diffa, Maine-Soroa road near Chetimari village, killing the driver and wounding an humanitarian worker (Insecurity Insight, 2024). In May 2024, suspected ISWAP militants seized an ambulance from the.

Chetimari primary Health facility in Diffa department (Insecurity Insight, 2024). These incidents are evidence of systematic insurgent presence rather than episodic opportunism.

ACLED’s (2025) analysis of the 2024 to 2025 period affirm that ISWAP has increasingly focused their attacks on Nigerian military installations in Borno and Yobe States using improvised explosive devices (IED) and ground assaults, and has actively recruited foreign militants operating from Diffa Region of Niger Republic. The strategic logic of trans-border positioning is clear: by maintaining functional presence on both sides of the borders which are regarded as porous, ISWAP can exploit lack of coordination and intelligence sharing between Nigerian and Nigerien security forces, withdrawing across the borders when military pressure increased on one side and reconstituting in the other’s comparative safety. ACLED (2024) data indicate that the IED resurgence recorded in 2024 reflects external tactical training that ISWAP has received to compensate for combat losses, suggesting that trans-border supply and training routes through the corridor are operationally functional.

However March 2025 Niger Republic withdrew its membership from the MNJTF which has materially worsened the situation. Sector Four of Niger Republic contributed more than 1,000 troops providing the primary multilateral intelligence and surveillance capacity covering the whole of Diffa Region which Maine-Soroa is included (The Caravel, 2025). The withdrawal of this contribution has left the corridor with significantly reduced multilateral security coverage at precisely the point when ISWAP’s operational tempo in the region was increasing. Security experts at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation assessed in April 2025 that the Niger Republic withdrawal represented a positive news for the insurgents operating in the corridor (Reuters, 2025).

Furthermore the security challenge posed by this corridor can not be dissociate to the lack of Border control post or surveillance technology. Insurgents embed within the legitimate mobility systems of border communities among cattle herders, grain traders, and daily commuters whose movement between Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa is economically necessary and socially unremarkable. The challenge is therefore not only trans-border movement but the architectural inability to distinguish threatening from non-threatening mobility within highly interconnected communities whose livelihoods depend on solely on border navigation. This is a governance architecture problem, not a surveillance problem, and it cannot be resolved by adding border infrastructure without addressing the socioeconomic conditions that make informal mobility indispensable.

The UNDP’s (2022) trans-border trade assessment for the Lake Chad Basin Region records that informal cross-boundary commerce constitutes a crucial livelihood pillar for border communities of both Garin-Gada and that of Manie-Soroa. Cattle, sesame, cow-peas, sorghum, and millet flow from Niger Republic into Nigeria, while manufactured goods, fuel, and medicines move in the opposite direction. OECD (2018) research generated that the scale of unrecorded trade between Nigeria and Niger Republic border is particularly high even by West African regional standards, reflecting deep historical patterns of economic symbiotic relations between Nigerian and Nigerien producers and consumers that predate colonial boundary demarcation.

However, from a security point of view, this vigorous informal economy constitutes dual-use infrastructure: the routes, vehicles, and trust networks that sustain legitimate cross-border trading activities also provide logistical scaffolding for illicit transactions. Generally Nigeria’s fuel smuggling commercially incentive by the scale differential between subsidized domestic petroleum prices and market prices in Niger Republic operates through the same informal ways as cattle trading. Drug trafficking, including tramadol and other illicit substances associated with armed groups in the region, moves through the same networks as grains.

The Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa corridor occupies a downstream position within one of sub-Saharan Africa’s most active arms trafficking routes. Libya’s 2011 state collapse generated substantial southward displacement of weapons from Muammar Gaddafi’s arsenals, enabling Tuareg rebels, Sahelian armed groups, and Lake Chad Basin insurgents to expand their military capacity (ISS Africa, 2022). Thus the most lucrative phase of southward trafficking occurred between 2012 and 2016, ISS Africa (2022) recorded that arms flows from Libya to Agadez and Tahoua regions in Niger Republic were actively resurgent in 2021 to 2022, with weapons seizures between January 2021 and February 2022 revealing both the trafficking scale and the limitations of interdiction. UNODC (2023) data show that weapons seizures across the Sahel increased by 105 percent between 2017 and 2021, a figure that reflects both intensified trafficking and partially improved interdiction capacity, though interceptions represent only a fraction of total flows.

Therefore. As ISS Africa (2022) documented, the security challenge is less the existence of arms flows than the structural inability of national authorities to distinguish licit from illicit mobility within highly integrated borderland communities.

Extensive population displacement in the corridor both reflects and perpetuates insecurity through a feedback mechanism that the current counterinsurgency approaches have not sufficiently addressed. IOM’s DTM records document the path: as of March 2024, 6,041,927 conflict-affected individuals comprising internally displaced persons, returnees, and refugees were present across the four Lake Chad Basin states (IOM, 2024a). By April 2024, this figure had grown to 6,089,049 (IOM, 2024b). By February 2026, it had reached 6,488,974 (IOM, 2026). Nigeria hosted approximately 74 percent of this population across both 2024 data points, or roughly 4.5 million persons. Diffa Region in Niger Republic, the administrative unit encompassing Maine-Soroa accounted for the majority of Niger Republic 513,102 conflict-affected persons as of March 2024 (IOM, 2024a).

Additionally These figures carry certain implications for border governance capacity. Administrative systems in Yobe State and Diffa Region were determine for considerably smaller and more stable populations. The presence of hundreds of thousands of displaced persons creates what the paper terms administrative blind spots: zones of demographic complexity in which formal identity documentation is absent or forged, household compositions are continuously shifting, and the distinction between IDPs, refugees, returnees, and new arrivals is practically unverifiable at the border post level. ISWAP and other armed actors exploit this administrative complexity systematically moving among displaced populations, adopting displaced-person identities, and using displaced communities as recruitment pools and resupply bases.

Morevoer It is analytically essential to resist the securitisation of displaced persons as such. The overwhelming majority of the 6.49 million conflict-affected individuals in the Lake Chad Basin are victims of violence rather than perpetrators.

The institutional record of regional security cooperation in the Lake Chad Basin is more substantial than critics sometimes acknowledge. The MNJTF recorded at least 176 armed engagements with Boko Haram factions between January 2015 and March 2024 (ACLED, 2024). Operation Lake Sanity, launched in 2022, produced documented disruptions of insurgent territorial control on the Lake Chad islands. At the bilateral level, Nigeria and Niger reached a renewed high-level security dialogue agreement in April 2025 following the post-coup diplomatic strain, with joint operations confirmed as ongoing in the Lake Chad region (African Security Analysis, 2025). In December 2025, a Joint Border Security Meeting convened at Nigeria’s Defence Headquarters following a cross-border incident in Katsina State, producing commitments to enhanced communication protocols (DHQ, 2025). In January 2026, Nigeria and Niger deepened customs cooperation in a manner that provides a potential institutional model for security domain engagement (VON, 2026). These are genuine achievements.

Meanwhile the second mechanism is the illustrate a strategic decentralisation of insurgent operations in response to military pressure. Sincethe death of Abubakar Shekau in May 2021 and the eventual reorganisation of JAS remnants, both ISWAP and reconstituted Boko Haram operations have demonstrated tactical adaptability documented across multiple ACLED and International Crisis Group data sources. Rather than concentrating forces in fixed territorial strongholds vulnerable to conventional military operations, both groups have shifted toward smaller, more mobile units operating across a wider geographic footprint (ACLED, 2024; International Crisis Group, 2024). The IED resurgence documented by ACLED in 2024 reflecting external tactical training that ISWAP has received to compensate for combat losses represents one operationalisation of this adaptation (ACLED, 2025).

For the Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa corridor precisely, this decentralisation strategy means that insurgent presence is characterised by transit rather than occupation. Armed actors use the corridor to move arms, conscript personnel, deliver logistics, and evacuate casualties in ways that are functionally effective but leave minimal territorial footprint detectable by conventional intelligence methods. The corridor functions as a logistics artery rather than a frontline. This has direct implications for how security agencies must conceptualise the threat: the standard counterinsurgency model of clearing territory and establishing static checkpoints is poorly suited to a threat defined by adaptive mobility rather than territorial control.

The third mechanism is governance fragmentation: the architectural mismatch between the integratedf nctional geography of armed groups and the nationally soiled governance structure of the states charged with countering them. Nigerian security agencies the Army, the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigeria Immigration Service, the Nigeria Customs Service operate under national mandates, with budgets determined in Abuja and reporting structures accountable to national institutions. Their Nigerien counterparts operate under analogous national structures accountable to Niamey. The institutional interface between these two systems at the Garin-Gada and Maine-Soroa border is, in practice, thin, episodic, and dependent on individual relationships and informal communication rather than on systematic protocols.

This fragmentation operates simultaneously at multiple levels. At the strategic level, it produces the national interest divergence that has consistently undermined MNJTF operational effectiveness, most acutely illustrated by Niger’s March 2025 withdrawal. At the tactical level, it produces the communication breakdowns illustrated by the December 2025 Katsina incident. At the administrative level, it produces the information gaps through which displaced persons, informal traders, and armed actors alike move largely invisible to any single authority with both the mandate and the capacity to act on what it observes. Buzan and Waever’s (2003) RSCT provides the theoretical vocabulary for understanding why this fragmentation is structurally dangerous: in a regional security complex characterised by deep interdependence, any governance gap in one member state rapidly becomes a security liability for all. The Garin-Gada--Maine-Soroa corridor is simultaneously a symptom and a cause of the Lake Chad Basin’s persistent insecurity.

Beyond documenting insecurity in a single border corridor, the findings make three broader contributions to the scholarship on insurgency, border governance, and regional security in the Lake Chad Basin.

First, the study challenges the prevailing tendency within the Boko Haram literature to explain insurgent resilience primarily through military capability, ideological evolution, territorial control, or state weakness (Walker, 2012; Thurston, 2017; Zenn, 2020). While these factors remain important, the findings demonstrate that insurgent organisations increasingly depend on strategically embedded border corridors that facilitate continuous movement of personnel, weapons, logistics, and commercial resources. The Garin-Gada–Maine-Soroa corridor therefore illustrates that insurgent resilience is sustained not only through the control of territory but also through the control and exploitation of mobility across socially embedded border spaces.

Second, the findings extend existing border governance scholarship by demonstrating that border porosity should not be understood solely as a consequence of limited state capacity. Rather, border porosity emerges from the interaction of historically embedded cross-border identities, informal economic systems, insurgent adaptive strategies, and fragmented governance arrangements. This perspective shifts analytical attention away from viewing border corridors merely as weakly governed spaces and instead conceptualises them as complex socio-political environments where state and non-state actors continuously negotiate authority, mobility, and security.

Third, the study contributes to Regional Security Complex Theory by illustrating how governance failures within a single border corridor generate security consequences that extend beyond national boundaries. The evidence demonstrates that institutional fragmentation at the Nigeria–Niger border creates vulnerabilities that are rapidly exploited by insurgent organisations operating across the wider Lake Chad Basin. Consequently, the security of individual border corridors cannot be understood solely within national frameworks but must be analysed as integral components of an interconnected regional security architecture.

Collectively, these findings suggest that future research should move beyond analyses centred exclusively on territorial strongholds and military campaigns toward greater examination of corridor-level governance, cross-border mobility systems, and the social infrastructures that sustain insurgent adaptation.

Given the social embeddedness of borderland communities documented in Section 4.1, effective border intelligence is ultimately dependent on community cooperation. Formal security agencies cannot generate the granular, real-time information about unusual movements, unfamiliar individuals, and suspicious transactions that local community members possess and that can disrupt insurgent transit networks. A formal community-based border surveillance programme, modelled on existing community watch schemes in northeastern Nigeria but extended to encompass cross-border cooperation between Nigerian and Nigerien communities, could provide this intelligence capacity while simultaneously strengthening community ownership of border security outcomes. Such a programme would require careful design to prevent the well-documented risks of community surveillance mechanisms being captured for local score-settling or ethnically targeted harassment, which have undermined analogous initiatives in other Sahelian contexts.

The displacement governance problem documented in Section 4.4 requires systematic tracking of population movements at the corridor level. A biometric cross-border mobility registration system, jointly operated by Nigeria and Niger with technical support from IOM, would generate the population data necessary to identify anomalous movement patterns potentially indicative of security threats, while simultaneously improving humanitarian response accuracy. IOM’s DTM infrastructure, which already produces monthly displacement dashboards for the Lake Chad Basin, provides a technical foundation on which such a system could be built. Implementation would require robust data protection safeguards and transparent community communication about data use and access.

At the regional level, the Lake Chad Basin Commission should develop a digital early warning system that aggregates conflict event data from ACLED and comparable sources, displacement figures from IOM’s DTM, and field reports from humanitarian actors operating in the basin into a common operational picture accessible to security agencies in all four member states. The technical foundation for such a system exists in embryonic form through the LCBC’s Stabilization Facility monitoring frameworks; the operational challenge is to develop interoperability between national systems and to ensure that aggregated intelligence is translated into coordinated responses rather than siloed in national institutional archives. Niger’s MNJTF withdrawal makes this kind of lateral information architecture more, not less, important as a substitute for the multilateral coordination capacity that has been lost.

The data supporting the findings of this study are derived entirely from publicly available secondary sources. Conflict event data were obtained from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED) project, displacement statistics from the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM), firearms trafficking data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and supplementary information from reports published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the International Crisis Group, the Institute for Security Studies (ISS Africa), and other publicly accessible institutional sources cited in the reference list. No new primary datasets were generated during this study. All data are available through the respective organizations’ official websites and can be accessed using the references provided in the manuscript.

•  ACLED: A decade after Chibok: Assessing Nigeria's regional response to Boko Haram. Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project; 2024. Reference Source
•  ACLED: Q&A: The Islamic State's pivot to Africa. Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project; 2025, September 4. Reference Source
•  Adesoji AO: Between Maitatsine and Boko Haram: Islamic fundamentalism and the response of the Nigerian state. Africa Today. 2020; 57(4): 98–119. Publisher Full Text
•  African Security Analysis: Niger and Nigeria reaffirm their cooperation in the face of cross-border challenges.2025, April 18. Reference Source
•  Buzan B, Waever O: Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press; 2003. Publisher Full Text
•  Defence Headquarters (DHQ) Nigeria: DHQ explains cross-border tension involving local vigilantes, Nigerien troops in Katsina. AllAfrica; 2025, December 1. Reference Source
•  Donnan H, Wilson TM: Borderlands: Ethnographic approaches to security, power, and identity. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010.
•  Englebert P, Tarango S, Carter M: Dismemberment and suffocation: A contribution to the debate on African boundaries. Comp. Pol. Stud. 2002; 35(10): 1093–1118. Publisher Full Text
•  Herbst J: States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton University Press; 2000.
•  Insecurity Insight: Niger flash news.2024. Reference Source
•  Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Africa: Arms trafficking from Libya to Niger is back in business.2022, July 28. Reference Source
•  International Crisis Group: JAS vs. ISWAP: The war of the Boko Haram splinters (Africa Briefing No. 196).2024, March 28. Reference Source
•  International Organization for Migration (IOM): West and Central Africa -- Lake Chad Basin crisis monthly dashboard 62 (March 2024). Displacement Tracking Matrix; 2024a, April 8. Reference Source
•  International Organization for Migration (IOM): West and Central Africa -- Lake Chad Basin crisis monthly dashboard 63 (April 2024). Displacement Tracking Matrix; 2024b, April 29. Reference Source
•  International Organization for Migration (IOM): Lake Chad Basin crisis monthly dashboard. Displacement Tracking Matrix; 2026, February. Reference Source
•  Matfess H: Women and the war on Boko Haram: Wives, weapons, witnesses. Zed Books; 2017. Publisher Full Text
•  Menkhaus K: Stabilization and humanitarian access in a collapsed state: The Somali case. Disasters. 2010; 34(S3): S320–S341. Publisher Full Text
•  Newman D: The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our borderless world. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2006; 30(2): 143–161. Publisher Full Text
•  Nigerian Current: Nigeria, Niger agree on boundary re-demarcation, security coordination.2025, December 11. Reference Source
•  OECD: Incentives and constraints of informal trade between Nigeria and its neighbours (West African Papers No. 16). OECD Publishing; 2018. Publisher Full Text
•  Paasi A: Bounded spaces in a borderless world: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power. 2009; 2(2): 213–234. Publisher Full Text
•  Perouse de Montclos M-A: Boko Haram: The history of an African jihadist movement. Princeton University Press; updated ed2021.
•  Raeymaekers T, Menkhaus K, Vlassenroot K: State and non-state regulation in African protracted crises: Governance without government?. Afrika Focus. 2008; 21(2): 7–21. Publisher Full Text
•  Reuters: Niger junta's MNJTF withdrawal 'good news for jihadists', analysts warn. Reuters; 2025, April.
•  SBM Intelligence: Comatose: Niger's ruling junta withdraws from Multinational Joint Task Force. SBM Intelligence Substack; 2025, April. Reference Source
•  The Caravel: Niger to withdraw from key counterterrorist mission.2025, April 13. Reference Source
•  Thurston A: Boko Haram: The history of an African jihadist movement. Princeton University Press; 2017. Publisher Full Text
•  Thurston A: Jihadists of North Africa and the Sahel: Local politics and rebel groups. Cambridge University Press; 2020. Publisher Full Text
•  United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): Cross-border trade in the Lake Chad Basin region. UNDP West and Central Africa; 2022. Reference Source
•  United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC): Firearms trafficking in the Sahel. UNODC; 2023. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
•  Voice of Nigeria (VON): Nigeria, Republic of Niger deepen border security cooperation.2026, February 7. Reference Source
•  Walker A: What is Boko Haram? United States Institute of Peace Special Report No. 308. USIP; 2012.
•  Zenn J: Unmasking Boko Haram: Exploring global jihad in Nigeria. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2020. Publisher Full Text

Current Reviewer Status:

AWAITING PEER REVIEW

AWAITING PEER REVIEW

?