Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Assessment of Dental Caries among Adolescents in Private Educational Institutions of Kabul City [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Дата публикации: 28-07-2026 12:15:58

Objective Dental caries continues to be a significant public health concern, particularly prevalent during adolescence. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of dental caries among adolescents aged 10 to 18 years attending two different types of private schools in Kabul City. Materials and Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study included 381 school-going adolescents. Data was collected through pre-structured questionnaires and face-to-face interviews, while oral examinations were conducted by an experienced dentist. Both primary and permanent dentitions were assessed for decayed, missing, and filled teeth. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The mean age of participants was 14.6 ± 2.13 years, predominantly boys, as girls above grade six are not permitted to attend school in Afghanistan. The prevalence of dental caries was high (70.1%) and decreased with increasing age (p = 0.004), number of siblings (p < 0.001), and better tooth-brushing habits (p = 0.025). The mean DMFT score was 2.40 ± 2.45. Overall, 45.4% of students had good oral hygiene, 11.3% had poor oral hygiene, and 46.7% presented with dental calculus. Both dental calculus and oral hygiene were significantly associated with tooth-brushing habits and use of dental cleansing agents (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study highlights a high prevalence of dental caries among students aged 10–18 years at private schools in Kabul, varying by school type. Factors such as age and tooth brushing habits significantly influence dental health, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted oral health education and interventions.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Update Text
We sincerely thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback, which has helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. In response, we have made the following revisions:
The study rationale has been strengthened by explicitly justifying the focus on adolescents and private schools in Kabul, highlighting their relevance to oral health planning.
The age statistics have been corrected (mean age 14.6 ± 2.13 years), and all descriptive data were reviewed for accuracy.
The statistical significance threshold has been clarified as p < 0.05, and inconsistencies in reporting have been corrected.
Details of the sampling method, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and participation rates have been added to improve transparency.
The definition of dental caries has been updated, with clarification on inclusion of filled teeth in DMFT scoring.
Discrepancies between text and tables (maternal literacy, oral hygiene) have been corrected.
Reference 18 has been replaced with a more appropriate epidemiological citation.
Extensive language editing was performed to correct typographical and grammatical errors.
The limitations section now acknowledges the restricted inclusion of female participants and its impact on generalizability.
The discussion has been expanded to interpret findings in relation to the WHO Global Oral Health Action Plan 2023–2030, emphasizing the importance of school-based preventive strategies.
Methodological clarifications include oral hygiene assessment criteria, and acknowledgment of the convenience-based sampling approach.
Table 3 has been reformatted for clarity, and causal wording has been replaced with appropriate associative language.
We believe these revisions address the reviewers’ concerns and enhance the scientific robustness of the manuscript. The updated/new version provides more accurate data, clearer methodology, and stronger contextual interpretation, thereby contributing valuable epidemiological evidence for oral health planning in Afghanistan.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Manuel S Thomas
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Shahab Uddin Ahmadi

Introduction

Dental caries is a non-communicable chronic disease that leads to the progressive destruction of tooth structure.1 Despite being easily preventable, it remains a major global public health issue, particularly affecting children and adolescents.2 The distribution of caries is influenced by its etiology. The process begins sub-clinically with the accumulation of cariogenic bacteria in dental plaque, a transparent biofilm that forms on tooth surfaces from birth. These bacteria feed on fermentable carbohydrates, producing acids that dissolve and demineralize the tooth surface. Poor oral hygiene and a diet high in sugar lead to unchecked demineralization, resulting in cavities. If untreated, these cavities progressively damage the tooth structure.3 Regular oral hygiene practices, particularly using fluoridated toothpaste, can significantly reduce the incidence of dental caries.4

In many countries, population-based surveys or surveillance systems to monitor oral health are not prioritized in public health initiatives.5 Afghanistan is among these countries and lacks nationwide epidemiological data on the prevalence of oral diseases, with only a few studies conducted in provinces like Kabul and Herat. A study conducted in Kabul focused on schoolchildren aged 7 to 13 attending government schools in the city.6 Adolescence is a critical period for oral health because dietary habits, oral hygiene behaviors, and independence in self-care become more established during these years, potentially increasing the risk of dental caries. Furthermore, private schools in Kabul represent an important but understudied population with potentially different socioeconomic backgrounds, dietary patterns, and access to oral healthcare compared with students attending public schools. Therefore, assessing dental caries among adolescents in private schools may provide valuable information for understanding oral health patterns in this population. In this study, we aim to assess the prevalence of dental caries among schoolchildren aged 10 to 18 years in two different types of private schools in Kabul City.

Materials and methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on students aged 10 to 18 years in two different types of private schools in Kabul City. One Afghan Turk Maarif school was randomly selected from six eligible Afghan Turk Maarif schools operating in Kabul City. Afghan Turk Maarif Darul Ulum, a full-time residential school funded by the Turkish government and located in the 12th educational district of Kabul, was selected for the study. In addition, one other type of private school was randomly selected from private schools located in the 6th educational district of Kabul City. Shokoh High School, established in 2008, was selected as the second school. This school operates similarly to governmental schools, except that students are required to pay tuition fees.

In each selected school, all students from the selected classes who met the eligibility criteria were invited to participate in the study. Students aged 10–18 years who were present on the day of examination and provided informed consent/assent were included. Students who were absent during data collection or declined participation were excluded. This sampling approach was used to maximize participation and minimize selection bias.

Key variables assessed included age, sex, parental literacy, parental occupation, frequency of tooth brushing, dental floss usage, and oral hygiene practices. In this study, dental carriers were defined as the presence of clinically detectable cavitated lesions on at least one tooth surface. Non-cavitated enamel lesions (white spot lesions) were not considered dental caries for the purpose of this study. Dental caries experience was assessed using the DMFT index, which records the number of decayed (D), missing (M), and filled (F) permanent teeth. Filled teeth were included in the DMFT score because they represent previous caries experience and prior treatment of dental decay. Good oral hygiene was characterized by clean teeth, the absence of visible dental and gingival disease, and no halitosis. Dental calculus was defined as hardened deposits formed by the accumulation and mineralization of bacterial plaque on tooth surfaces.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review board of Kabul University of Medical Sciences (Reg No: 413/16-09-2018), and the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents, and assent was obtained from students before participation. To ensure student safety during oral examinations, single-use instruments and equipment were utilized, and examinations were conducted under strict sanitary conditions.

Data was collected using a pre-structured questionnaire that had been used in our previous study6 and administered through interviews. The oral examinations were carried out by an experienced dentist using dental probes and mouth mirrors under adequate lighting conditions.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Descriptive characteristics were summarized using means (±SD) and proportions as appropriate. The Pearson Chi-square test was used for comparison of percentages, while Student’s t-test or Mann Whitney U test was applied for comparison of means as appropriate. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

This study includes 381 participants from two schools, Afghan Turk and Shokoh. The Afghan Turk group is composed exclusively of boys, whereas Shokoh has a more varied distribution with 88.4% boys and 11.6% girls, the latter limited to grade 6 or below. Age demographics reveal that, at the time of the study, Afghan Turk had no participants aged 12 or younger, while 41.4% of Shokoh participants fell into this age category. The largest age group across both schools is 13 to 15 years, representing 44.1% of the total sample. Maternal literacy levels varied between the groups, with approximately one-third (37%) of Afghan Turk participants reporting that their mothers were literate compared with 47% among Shokoh participants, resulting in an overall maternal literacy rate of 41.7%. Paternal literacy is comparatively high in both groups, with 81.4% of fathers being literate. The majority of mothers in both groups are housewives, with a slightly higher percentage in Afghan Turk (91%) than in Shokoh (82.9%). Paternal employment demonstrates diversity, with 37.8% of fathers across both groups employed in jobs that require education, 34.9% in business, and 27.3% in jobs that do not require education. Family size also shows notable differences. Afghan Turk participants tend to have larger families, with 41.5% reporting seven or more siblings, while Shokoh participants are more likely to have three or fewer siblings (52.5%). Tooth-brushing habits are high across both groups, with 91.6%. Shokoh participants exhibit slightly higher adherence (95%) compared to Afghan Turk (88.5%). Once-daily brushing is the most common practice, especially among Afghan Turk participants (82.5%), although 20.1% of participants across both groups report brushing twice daily ( Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants by school.Afghan TurkShokohTotaln%n%n %Sex Boys200100.016088.436094.5 Girls00.02111.6215.5Age years 12 or younger00.07541.47519.7 13 to 159748.57139.216844.1 16 or older10351.53519.313836.2Maternal literacy Literate7437.08547.015941.7 Illiterate12663.09653.022258.3Paternal literacy Literate16281.014881.831081.4 Illiterate3819.03318.27118.6Maternal working status Housewife18291.015082.933287.1 Working189.03117.74912.9Paternal working status Jobs requiring education7839.06636.514437.8 Business6331.57038.713334.9 Jobs not requiring education5929.54524.910427.3Number of siblings 3 or less2914.59552.512432.5 4 to 68844.06334.815139.6 7 or more8341.52312.710627.8Tooth Brushing Habits Brushing17788.517295.034991.6 Not Brushing2311.595.0328.4Brushing frequency Once a Day14682.512773.827378.2 Twice a Day2614.74425.67020.1 Three Times a Day52.810.661.7Dental cleaning tools Use dental floss6431.56033.112332.3 Do not use dental floss12964.512166.925065.6 Use dental picks84.000.082.1Class 5 to 700.010859.710828.3 8 to 99045.03619.912633.1 10 to 1211055.03720.414738.6Total200100.0181100.0381100.0

Table 2 presents a comparison of dental health metrics between Afghan Turk and Shokoh students. Over 10% of participants had at least one decayed deciduous tooth, with a higher prevalence among Shokoh students (22.1%) (p < 0.001), likely influenced by the younger age group in this school. In terms of permanent teeth, 56% of Afghan Turk students had at least one decayed tooth, compared to 87.3% in Shokoh. Afghan Turk and Shokoh students with 1-2 decayed permanent teeth comprised 35.5% and 40.3% of their groups, respectively. Moreover, 26.5% of Shokoh students had 3-4 decayed permanent teeth, compared to 13.0% in Afghan Turk, and the highest decay rate (5+ decayed teeth) affected 7.5% of Afghan Turk students and 10.5% of Shokoh students (p < 0.001). The rate of missing teeth also varied, with 91.0% of Afghan Turk students had no missing teeth, compared to 76.2% in Shokoh.

Table 2. Distribution of dental problems among students by school in Kabul city.Afghan TurkShokohTotaln%n%n %Number of decayed deciduous teethp value < 0.001 Zero19698.014177.933788.5 1 to 242.03016.6348.9 3 or more00.0105.5102.6Number of decayed permanent teethp value < 0.001 Zero8844.04122.712933.9 1 to 27135.57340.314437.8 3 to 42613.04826.57419.4 5 or more157.51910.5348.9Number of missing teethp value < 0.001 Zero18291.013876.232084.0 1 to 2157.53519.35013.1 3 or more31.584.4112.9Oral hygienep value < 0.001 Good7638.09753.617345.4 Average11155.55429.816543.3 Poor136.53016.64311.3Dental calculusp value = 0.928 Yes9346.58547.017846.7 No10753.59653.020353.3Overall decayed teethp value < 0.001 Yes11557.515284.026770.1 No8542.52916.011429.9

Good oral hygiene was more prevalent among Shokoh students than Afghan Turk students (53.6% vs. 38.0%). However, poor oral hygiene was also observed more frequently among Shokoh students (16.6%) compared with Afghan Turk students (6.5%) (p < 0.001). Rates of dental calculus were similar, affecting about 47% of students in both groups. However, overall decay presence was significantly higher in Shokoh, with 84.0% of students showing at least one decayed tooth, compared to 57.5% in Afghan Turk, highlighting a substantial difference in decay prevalence (p < 0.001).

Table 3 presents the mean Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores for students from Afghan Turk and Shokoh schools, categorized by sex and age groups. For Afghan Turk students, the overall mean DMFT score is 1.82 ± 2.17, with specific scores of 1.56 ± 1.97 for those aged 13-15 years and 2.06 ± 2.33 for students aged 16 years or older (p = 0.210). In contrast, Shokoh students have a mean DMFT score of 3.1 ± 2.64 for boys and 2.71 ± 2.03 for girls (p = 0.255). Additionally, Shokoh students exhibit a mean DMFT score of 2.45 ± 2.07 for the younger group (12 years or younger), 3.06 ± 2.25 for those in the 13-15 age range, and 4.34 ± 3.56 for the older group (16 years or older) (p = 0.010). The overall mean DMFT score for Shokoh students is 3.06 ± 2.57. The total mean DMFT score across both schools was 2.40 ± 2.45, with a highly significant p-value of <0.001, indicating substantial differences in dental health among the various groups studied.

Table 3. Distribution of DMFTs by age, sex and school.Afghan TurkShokohOverallMeanSDP valueMeanSDP valueMeanSD P valueSex Boy1.822.173.12.640.6892.392.470.255 Girl2.712.032.712.03Age ≤12 years2.452.070.0102.452.070.433 13-15 years1.561.970.2103.062.252.192.22 ≥16 years2.062.334.343.562.642.86Overall1.822.173.062.572.402.45<0.001

The overall prevalence of dental caries among participants was 70.1%, with a significant gender difference: 68.9% of boys were affected compared to 90.5% of girls (p = 0.036). Age also significantly influenced caries prevalence, with 85.3% of children aged 12 years or younger exhibiting caries, compared to 68.5% in the 13-15 age group and 63.8% among those aged 16 years or older (p = 0.004). While there was a higher prevalence of caries among children of illiterate mothers (72.5%) compared to those with literate mothers (66.7%), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.218). Similarly, maternal working status did not show a significant impact on caries prevalence (p = 0.655) ( Table 4).

Table 4. Distribution of dental caries by socio-demographic characteristics and oral hygiene practices among students by school in Kabul city.Dental cariesYesNon%n %Sexp value = 0.036 Boys24868.911231.1 Girls1990.529.5Age (years)p value = 0.004 ≤12 years6485.31114.7 13-15 years11568.55331.5 ≥16 years8863.85036.2Maternal literacyp value = 0.218 Literate10666.75333.3 Illiterate16172.56127.5Paternal literacyp value = 0.828 Literate21870.39929.7 Illiterate4969.02231.0Maternal working statusp value = 0.655 Housewife 23470.59829.5 Working3367.31632.7Paternal working statusp value = 0.429 Jobs requiring education9968.84531.2 Business9067.74332.3 Jobs not requiring education7875.02625.0Number of siblingsp value < 0.001 3 or less10483.92016.1 4 to 69965.65234.4 7 or more6460.44239.6Tooth Brushing Habitsp value = 0.025 Brushing23968.511031.5 Not Brushing2887.5412.5Brushing frequencyp value = 0.008 Once a Day19872.57527.5 Twice a Day3854.33245.7 Three Times a Day350.0350.0Dental cleaning toolsp value = 0.744 Use dental floss8972.43427.6 Do not use dental floss17268.87831.2 Use dental picks675.0225.0Oral hygienep value = 0.087 Good11566.55833.5 Average11670.34929.7 Poor3683.7716.3Classp value = 0.004 5 to 78982.41917.6 8 to 98365.94334.1 10 to 129564.65235.4Total26970.111429.9

Interestingly, the number of siblings had an inverse correlation with caries prevalence: 83.9% of participants with three or fewer siblings experienced caries, while the prevalence decreased to 65.6% among those with four to six siblings and only 60.4% for those with seven or more siblings (p < 0.001). Tooth brushing habits were also associated with caries rates; 87.5% of participants who did not brush their teeth reported caries, in contrast to 68.5% of those who brushed regularly (p = 0.025). Furthermore, brushing frequency affected dental health outcomes, with 72.5% of participants brushing once daily exhibiting caries, compared to 54.3% of those brushing twice daily and 50% of those brushing three times a day (p = 0.008) ( Table 4).

Oral hygiene status was nearly significant, with 83.7% of students with poor oral hygiene experiencing caries compared to 66.5% of those with good hygiene (p = 0.087). Finally, class level significantly impacted caries rates: 82.4% of students in classes 5 to 7 reported caries, while lower rates of 65.9% and 64.6% were observed in classes 8 to 9 and 10 to 12, respectively (p = 0.004). Overall, these findings indicate that both demographic factors and oral health behaviors significantly contribute to the prevalence of dental caries among students ( Table 4).

The overall prevalence of dental calculus among participants was 46.7%, with no significant difference observed between the two schools (p = 0.928). However, age was a significant factor influencing the presence of dental calculus (p < 0.001). Among children aged 12 years or younger, 40.0% exhibited dental calculus, while the prevalence was 39.3% for those aged 13-15 years. This figure increased significantly to 59.4% for participants aged 16 years or older. Tooth brushing habits also significantly affected the prevalence of dental calculus; 43.8% of students who brushed their teeth were found to have calculus, in contrast to 78.1% of those who did not engage in regular brushing (p < 0.001). Additionally, the type of cleansing agent used was correlated with the presence of dental calculus (p < 0.001): only 31.1% of participants who used both toothpaste and mouthwash had calculus, while this figure rose to 45.7% among those who used only toothpaste and reached 75.0% for those who used no cleansing agents at all ( Table 5).

Table 5. Distribution of dental calculus and oral hygiene status by age and school among study participants.Dental calculusOral hygiene statusYesNoGoodAveragePoorn%n%n%n%n %Schoolp value = 0.928p value < 0.001 Afghan Turk9346.510753.57638.011155.5136.5 Shokoh8547.09653.09753.65429.83016.6Agep value < 0.001p value = 0.005 ≤12 years3040.04560.04560.02229.3810.7 13-15 years6639.310260.78148.27041.71710.1 ≥16 years8259.45640.64734.17352.91813.0Tooth Brushing Habitsp value < 0.001p value < 0.001 Brushing15343.819656.217149.014341.03510.0 Not Brushing2578.1721.926.32268.8825.0Cleansing agentp value < 0.001p value < 0.001 Toothpaste & Mouthwash1431.13168.92964.41226.748.9 Toothpaste13745.716354.314247.312742.33110.3 None2775.0925.025.62672.2822.2Total17846.720353.317345.416543.34311.3

Regarding oral hygiene status, a significant difference was observed between the two schools (p < 0.001). At Afghan Turk, only 38.0% of students were classified as having good oral hygiene, compared to a more favorable 53.6% in Shokoh. Age was also a determining factor for oral hygiene, with significant variations noted (p = 0.005). Among participants aged 12 years or younger, 60.0% maintained good oral hygiene, whereas this figure dropped to 48.2% for those aged 13-15 years and decreased further to just 34.1% for students aged 16 years or older. Tooth brushing habits were closely linked to oral hygiene status, with 49.0% of those who brushed their teeth reporting good hygiene, compared to a mere 6.3% of non-brushing students (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the type of cleansing agent used significantly correlated with oral hygiene status (p < 0.001). Among participants who utilized both toothpaste and mouthwash, 64.4% achieved good oral hygiene, while 47.3% of those using toothpaste only did, and only 5.6% of those using no cleansing agents reached the same standard. Overall, 45.4% of participants exhibited good oral hygiene, highlighting the urgent need for improved oral health education and practices among students ( Table 5).

Discussion

This study presents a detailed analysis of dental health metrics among students from Afghan Turk and Shokoh schools, revealing significant differences in dental caries prevalence, oral hygiene status, and calculus presence. The high overall prevalence of dental caries (70.1%) and an especially high rate in Shokoh (84.0%) indicate a pressing public health concern. Contributing factors may include the younger age profile at Shokoh, where a substantial proportion of students aged 12 years or younger exhibited higher decay rates (85.3%). This trend aligns with existing literature,79 which suggests younger children face a greater risk for dental caries, often due to limited oral hygiene practices and diets high in sugar.

Previous research on schoolchildren aged 7-13 in Kabul reported an overall caries prevalence of 78.8%,6 with differences in age distribution potentially explaining some variation between studies. Similar findings appear in a study by Bezian et al. in the Philippines, where 82.3% of students aged 11-13 had dental caries.10 Studies from Iran by Hamissi et al. and from Poland by Milona et al. found prevalence rates of 75.5% and 88.6%, respectively, among adolescents.11,12 In Egypt, Marwa et al. reported a prevalence of 74.0% in children aged 3 to 18,7 while another Egyptian study found a 53.1% prevalence among those aged 6 to 15.13 In India, studies indicated prevalence rates of 68.8% among children aged 6-1414 and 61.4% among adolescents aged 12-15.15

In Pakistan, a study reported a dental caries prevalence of 72.4%,16 while another showed a 67.2% prevalence among children aged 5-14.17 In Saudi Arabia, Al Zahrani et al. observed a prevalence of 74.6% among students aged 12 to 15,18 with a related study noting 71.3% in those aged 10-13.19 In contrast, a study in Albania reported a lower prevalence of 42.3% among students aged 7 to 15.20 Similarly, in countries such as China,21 Spain,22 Croatia,23 Portugal,24 Brazil,25 and Australia,26 caries prevalence in comparable age groups was below 50%. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Kale identified a 61.0% (95% CI: 50.0–72.0) prevalence for children aged 12 and a 66.0% (95% CI: 59.0%-73.0%) prevalence for 15-year-olds in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.27

Notably, 87.5% of students who did not brush regularly experienced caries, compared to 68.5% of those who brushed consistently, aligning with previous studies.2830 This highlights the critical role of promoting effective oral hygiene practices, as brushing frequency significantly impacts dental health outcomes. Participants who brushed only once daily showed a caries prevalence of 72.5%, underscoring the need for education on optimal brushing practices, particularly the benefits of brushing twice daily. Interestingly, there was an inverse correlation between the number of siblings and caries prevalence; as the number of siblings increased, caries rates decreased. This may reflect shared family practices or resources that support better oral health in larger families, though a study in Taiwan observed a positive correlation between siblings and dental issues.31 This discrepancy suggests further research is warranted to better understand the role of family dynamics in oral health behaviors.

Oral hygiene status also differed significantly between the two schools, with Shokoh students showing poorer hygiene (16.6%) compared to Afghan Turk students (6.5%). This disparity may stem from differences in access to dental care, nutritional choices, and health education within each community. Afghan Turk School, as a residential institution, provides consistent food and healthcare services to all students, which may contribute to the observed differences.

Finally, the study observed similar rates of dental calculus prevalence across both schools (46.7%), consistent with existing literature.32,33 However, age was a significant factor, with 59.4% of participants aged 16 or older showing calculus, suggesting that age-specific interventions may be beneficial. Proper use of oral hygiene products also showed positive effects; only 31.1% of students using both toothpaste and mouthwash had calculus, underscoring the value of effective oral care products in maintaining oral health.

The findings of this study also have important implications in relation to the WHO Global Oral Health Action Plan (GOHAP) 2023–2030,34 which emphasizes the integration of oral health into public health systems and aims to achieve universal access to essential oral healthcare services. The high prevalence of dental caries and suboptimal oral hygiene observed among students in this study highlight the need for school-based oral health promotion programs, preventive interventions, and improved access to affordable dental care in Afghanistan. Strengthening oral health education, encouraging regular tooth brushing with fluoridated toothpaste, and expanding preventive dental services may contribute to reducing the burden of oral diseases among adolescents and support the goals of the WHO oral health strategy.

This study represents the first examination of dental caries prevalence among private school students in Kabul, offering important insights into their oral health status. Conducted by experienced dentists, the findings are highly reliable. By comparing two types of private schools, the study sheds light on the influence of educational environments on dental health. However, the limited sample of schools and geographic scope may affect the generalizability of the results. In addition, the limited inclusion of female participants, largely due to restrictions on girls’ school attendance beyond grade 6 in Afghanistan during the study period, may further limit the applicability of the findings to the broader adolescent population.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study highlights the high prevalence of dental caries and poor oral hygiene among students in Kabul City, emphasizing the urgent need for improved oral health practices within this population. While disparities were observed between Afghan Turk and Shokoh students, the overall findings point to critical determinants such as age, tooth brushing habits, and the use of effective oral hygiene products. These results underscore the importance of implementing school-based oral health programs, promoting regular dental care, and increasing awareness of proper oral hygiene practices. Collaborative efforts among policymakers, educators, and health professionals are essential to reduce dental disease prevalence and foster a healthier future generation across Afghanistan.

References
  • 1.  Philip P, Prasanna P, Vijaya Remi R, et al.: Prevalence of dental caries among children and adolescents with intellectual disability in India: A scoping review. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2024; 37(5): e13278. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 2.  Petersen PE: Sociobehavioural risk factors in dental caries - international perspectives. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33(4): 274–279. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 3.  Kidd EA, Fejerskov O: Essentials of dental caries. Oxford University Press; 2016.
  • 4.  Featherstone JD: The continuum of dental caries--evidence for a dynamic disease process. J. Dent. Res. 2004; 83 Spec No C: C39–C42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 5.  Dye BA: The Global Burden of Oral Disease: Research and Public Health Significance. J. Dent. Res. 2017; 96(4): 361–363. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 6.  Aalemi AK, Yaqubi B: Prevalence of dental carries among school-going children aged 7-13 years in Kabul City. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1): 1092. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 7.  Abbass MMS, Mahmoud SA, El Moshy S, et al.: The prevalence of dental caries among Egyptian children and adolescences and its association with age, socioeconomic status, dietary habits and other risk factors. A cross-sectional study. F1000Res. 2019; 8: 8.
  • 8.  Prasai Dixit L, Shakya A, Shrestha M, et al.: Dental caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang school children of Nepal. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13: 20.
  • 9.  Van Chuyen N, Van Du V, Van Ba N, et al.: The prevalence of dental caries and associated factors among secondary school children in rural highland Vietnam. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1): 349. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 10.  Benzian H, Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, et al.: Untreated severe dental decay: a neglected determinant of low Body Mass Index in 12-year-old Filipino children. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 558.
  • 11.  Hamissi J, Ramezani GH, Ghodousi A: Prevalence of dental caries among high school attendees in Qazvin, Iran. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2008; 26(Suppl 2): 53–55. Publisher Full Text
  • 12.  Milona M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Szmidt M, et al.: Oral Health Related Behaviors in Relation to DMFT Indexes of Teenagers in an Urban Area of North-West Poland-Dental Caries Is Still a Common Problem. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(5). Publisher Full Text
  • 13.  Abdel Fattah MA, Barghouth MH, Wassel MO, et al.: Epidemiology of dental caries in permanent dentition: evidence from a population-based survey in Egypt. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1): 2438. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 14.  Arangannal P, Mahadev SK, Jayaprakash J: Prevalence of Dental Caries among School Children in Chennai, Based on ICDAS II. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016; 10(4): Zc09–Zc12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 15.  Veerasamy A, Kirk R, Gage J: Epidemiology of dental caries among adolescents in Tamil Nadu, India. Int. Dent. J. 2016; 66(3): 169–177. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 16.  Umer A, Umer A: Prevalence of dental caries among the primary school children of urban Peshawar. Journal of Khyber College of Dentistry. 2011; 2(1): 21–26.
  • 17.  Nayani AA, Iqbal R, Azam SI, et al.: Association between environmental tobacco smoke and dental caries amongst 5-14 years old children in Karachi, Pakistan. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2018; 68(2): 203–209. PubMed Abstract
  • 18.  Alzahrani A, Al-Qahtani M, Al-Barti M, et al.: Dietary Determinants of Dental Caries Prevalence and Experience in Saudi School children: Frequency versus Quantity. Sci. World J. 2022; 2022: 5447723. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 19.  Elfaki NK, Elgarrai ASE, Ibraheem A: Prevalence of dental caries among primary school attendees in Najran-Saudi Arabia. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 2014; 13: 37–41.
  • 20.  Laganà G, Fabi F, Abazi Y, et al.: Caries prevalence in a 7- to 15-year-old Albanian schoolchildren population. Ann. Stomatol. (Roma). 2012; 3(2): 38–43. PubMed Abstract
  • 21.  Wang X, Chen H, Hou R, et al.: Effect of dietary patterns on dental caries among 12-15 years-old adolescents: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1): 845. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 22.  Obregón-Rodríguez N, Fernández-Riveiro P, Piñeiro-Lamas M, et al.: Prevalence and caries-related risk factors in schoolchildren of 12- and 15-year-old: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1): 120. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 23.  Lešić S, Dukić W, Šapro Kriste Z, et al.: Caries prevalence among schoolchildren in urban and rural Croatia. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health. 2019; 27(3): 256–262. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 24.  Veiga NJ, Pereira CM, Ferreira PC, et al.: Prevalence of dental caries and fissure sealants in a Portuguese sample of adolescents. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3): e0121299. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 25.  Lemos PN, Rodrigues DA, Frazão P, et al.: Dental caries in peoples of Xingu Indigenous Park, Brazil, 2007 and 2013. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude. 2018; 27(1): e20171725. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 26.  Do LG, Ha DH, Spencer AJ: Factors attributable for the prevalence of dental caries in Queensland children. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2015; 43(5): 397–405. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 27.  Kale S, Kakodkar P, Shetiya S, et al.: Prevalence of dental caries among children aged 5-15 years from 9 countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a meta-analysis. East Mediterr. Health J. 2020; 26(6): 726–735. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 28.  Curtis AM, Cavanaugh JE, Levy SM, et al.: Examining caries aetiology in adolescence with structural equation modelling. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2018; 46(3): 258–264. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 29.  Löe H: Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int. Dent. J. 2000; 50(3): 129–139. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 30.  Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Johnson NW: Effect of Toothbrushing Frequency on Incidence and Increment of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2016; 95(11): 1230–1236. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 31.  Lin PY, Huang YH, Chen HH, et al.: Decline in dental caries experience among schoolchildren in Taiwan, 2012-2020. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2023; 51(3): 519–526. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 32.  Elias-Boneta AR, Ramirez K, Rivas-Tumanyan S, et al.: Prevalence of gingivitis and calculus in 12-year-old Puerto Ricans: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1): 13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 33.  Zhang S, Xu B, Liu J, et al.: Dental and periodontal status of 12-year-old Dai school children in Yunnan Province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015; 15(1): 117. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 34.  World Health Organizaiton: Global strategy and action plan on oral health 2023–2030. Geneva: World Health Organizaiton; 2024. Reference Source
  • 35.  Khalid AA: Dental Caries Study_AfghanTurk sav.sav Dataset. Dataset. figshare. 2025.Publisher Full Text
  • 36.  Khalid AA, Eshraqi AM: Consent form. Dataset. figshare. 2026. Publisher Full Text

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright

© 2026 Aalemi AK and Eshraqi AM. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 28 Jul 2026

Revised

Reviewer Report 05 Aug 2026

Shahab Uddin Ahmadi, Khatam-Al-Nabieen University,, Kabul,, Afghanistan 

Approved

VIEWS 0

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Close

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 28 Jan 2026

Reviewer Report 26 May 2026

Shahab Uddin Ahmadi, Khatam-Al-Nabieen University,, Kabul,, Afghanistan 

Approved with Reservations

VIEWS 0

  • Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

    Partly

  • Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

    Partly

  • Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

    Partly

  • If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

    Partly

  • Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

    Partly

  • Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

    Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Dentistry, Dental Public Health, Oral Epidemiology, Preventive Dentistry, Community Oral Health

Close

Reviewer Report 20 May 2026

Manuel S Thomas, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India 

Approved with Reservations

VIEWS 0

  • Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

    Partly

  • Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

    Partly

  • Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

    Partly

  • If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

    Partly

  • Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

    Yes

  • Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

    Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Dental caries

Close

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 28 Jan 2026

Comment

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Dental consultations and orofacial injuries in high-performance athletes participating in Latin American multi-sport events: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]07.9404-08-2026
2Effect of Combined CO₂ Laser Irradiation and Sodium Fluoride Varnish on Enamel Surface Morphology and Surface Elemental Composition: An In Vitro Split-Tooth Study [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]08.1323-07-2026
3The Influence of General Surgery Education on Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iraqi Dental Schools [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]08.5801-07-2026
4Cone-Beam CT Assessment of the Canalis Sinuosus in an Indian Population: A Retrospective Imaging Study [version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]011.8616-07-2026
5Reflective Practice and Teacher Growth Mindset in Collaborative School Cultures: The Moderating Role of Professional Learning Community among Indonesian In-Service Teachers [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]06.1607-08-2026
6A Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Citizenship Education and Competences for Democratic Culture: Global Trends, Knowledge Structure, and Future Research Agenda [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]05.304-08-2026
7Influence of Vanillin at different concentrations on the properties of commercial alginate impression materials: An in-vitro study. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]06.3227-07-2026
8Green Space Morphology and School Myopia in China09.701-02-2024
9Knowledge, Attitudes, and Readiness of Pharmacy Faculty toward Competency-Based Learning in Syrian Universities: A Cross-Sectional Study [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]016.5108-08-2026
10Inequalities in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes and Service Utilisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]08.0605-08-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 13.63. Источник: f1000research.com.