Kim Moody: Canada’s highest-income earners already shoulder a disproportionate share of the tax burden
Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with vendors and exhibitors during a visit to the Calgary Stampede on July 12. Photo by Brent Calver/Postmedia filesArticle content
I’m a fun guy to go out for dinner with; just ask my wife or our friends. Before long, I’ll steer the conversation toward tax policy. I know, I know, I’m a blast at parties.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
or
Article content
A common topic is how much the so-called rich actually pay in income tax. The reaction is almost always the same when I share the statistics: genuine surprise. Why? Because many people assume wealthy Canadians pay little tax thanks to endless loopholes and rate preferences. They simply aren’t contributing their fair share.
Article content
Article content
Article content
But the data doesn’t support that shallow narrative.
Article content
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
The top 20 per cent of income-earning families pay 65.3 per cent of all personal income taxes in Canada and 58.3 per cent of all taxes once you add sales, property and every other levy governments collect, according to the Fraser Institute’s annual study on tax progressivity. The bottom 20 per cent pay 0.7 per cent of personal income taxes and 1.7 per cent of total taxes.
Article content
Statistics Canada’s effective tax rate data tell a similar story. The top one per cent of income earners in 2023 reported 10.1 per cent of total income, but paid 22.1 per cent of federal and provincial income taxes. The top 0.01 per cent — roughly 3,000 people — reported 1.1 per cent of total income, but paid three per cent of total taxes.
Article content
The bottom 50 per cent paid five per cent of total taxes, clear evidence that redistribution is a central pillar of Canadian tax policy.
Article content
Consumption taxes have a similar narrative.
Article content
The highest-income quintile spent, on average, $123,447 on goods and services in 2023, more than triple the $40,080 spent by the lowest quintile, according to Statistics Canada’s Survey of Household Spending. GST and HST apply to most consumer purchases, and the exemptions — basic groceries, most financial services, resale housing — apply the same way regardless of income. The wealthy are paying substantially more consumption taxes simply because they buy more.
Article content
Article content
Then there are taxes aimed almost exclusively at higher-income Canadians. The federal luxury tax, introduced in 2022 on certain boats, aircraft and automobiles, was partly repealed in the last budget after the government acknowledged it was inefficient, costly to administer and harmful to Canadian industries. The same reasoning applies to automobiles, and the tax should be repealed entirely.
Article content
And let’s not forget what happens when someone leaves the country. Canada imposes a departure tax, so individuals who cease Canadian residency are generally deemed to dispose of their assets at fair market value immediately before departure, triggering tax on accrued gains subject to certain exceptions and deferrals. Similar rules apply at death.
Article content
The above evidence settles one debate: Canada’s highest-income earners already shoulder a disproportionate share of the tax burden. The more important question is what happens when governments continue trying to extract even more revenue from a relatively small group of taxpayers.
Article content
The evidence on targeting the rich for more is well documented: the United Kingdom hiked its top rate to 50 per cent in 2010 and it was projected to raise 2.5 billion pounds; it raised, at most, one billion pounds. The same happened in Canada in 2016 when the Justin Trudeau government increased the top personal tax rate by four percentage points. The instinct to vilify success rather than celebrate it reflects the same short-sightedness.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taxpayer double taxed here and abroad wins in court against CRA | 0 | 5 | 15-07-2026 |
| 2 | Canadians increasingly using 'buy now, pay later' on groceries | 0 | 5 | 07-07-2026 |
| 3 | Минфин: налоги для богатых не будут меняться в ближайшие шесть лет | 0 | 0 | 30-10-2018 |
| 4 | A 5% wealth tax would drive billionaires out of California | -2 | 3 | 04-02-2026 |
| 5 | Teal meets tech billionaire and backs tax carve-out in same week teals called out big tech's influence | -2 | 6 | 27-05-2026 |
| 6 | Wealthy New Yorkers grumble as a new tax looms | -2 | 3 | 23-04-2026 |
| 7 | How to lower America’s soaring health-care costs | 0 | 5 | 20-11-2025 |
| 8 | Эксперты: налогообложение состоятельных россиян нужно повышать и дальше, но постепенно | 0 | 0 | 23-06-2020 |
| 9 | Funding Muni and BART: Should the very rich also pay? | 0 | 5 | 20-06-2025 |
| 10 | Минфин: налоговые льготы сейчас искажают конкурентную среду | 0 | 0 | 06-09-2018 |