Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Decision Legalizing Gay Marriage

Дата публикации: 10-11-2025 19:10:52

Justices declined to hear an appeal to “Obergefell v. Hodges” brought by anti-LGBTQ activist Kim Davis.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Justices declined to hear an appeal to “Obergefell v. Hodges” brought by anti-LGBTQ activist Kim Davis.

Protesters rally in front of the Supreme Court as it hears arguments on whether gay and transgender people are covered by a federal law barring employment discrimination on the basis of sex on Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019.Protesters rally in front of the Supreme Court as it hears arguments on whether gay and transgender people are covered by a federal law barring employment discrimination on the basis of sex on Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019.Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.

The Supreme Court has declined to hear a bid from anti-LGBTQ activist Kim Davis to challenge its landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.

The High Court dismissed Davis’s petition without comment on Monday. The decision means that the Obergefell v. Hodges decision will stand for now, after the Court struck fear into the LGBTQ community last week when it privately met to discuss the appeal on Friday.

The Court only needed four justices to agree to revisit the case. The original Obergefell decision was a 5-4 ruling, and several of the justices who dissented still sit on the Court — Justices Samuel Alito, John Roberts, and Clarence Thomas. Further, one of the judges who ruled in the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was replaced with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

Experts were still skeptical that the Court would take up the case. Thomas indicated in his opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson that he wanted the Court to revisit Obergefell, and Davis’s challenge directly cited Thomas’s words.

However, other conservative justices have indicated otherwise in recent months.

Alito recently criticized the decision in a lecture, but said that he didn’t think it should be overruled due to “respect afforded” to precedent. Barrett also suggested recently that she didn’t believe that same sex marriage rights should be overturned.

Davis, represented by right-wing group Liberty Counsel, had filed the appeal seeking to avoid paying hefty fees in relation to her anti-LGBTQ activism. The fees stemmed from a challenge by a couple who she refused a marriage license to shortly after the Obergefell ruling came down in June 2015. Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky, lost that case in 2023, and was ordered to pay the couple $360,000 in damages and legal fees.

Her legal counsel has argued that Davis’s declining to issue a license to same-sex couples is a right afforded to her under the First Amendment, even though legal experts have said that public officials have those rights suspended in order to perform their roles on behalf of the government.

Davis’s legal challenge framed her as a “victim” of the Obergefell decision, adding that her case was a “unique opportunity” to revisit and overturn the decision.

The Supreme Court’s decision was praised by LGBTQ advocates.

“Today, love won again. When public officials take an oath to serve their communities, that promise extends to everyone — including LGBTQ+ people. The Supreme Court made clear today that refusing to respect the constitutional rights of others does not come without consequences,” said Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson in a statement.

An important fundraising appeal: 10 Days to raise $50,000

Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. Today, as political censorship from the right intensifies, we have no choice but to ask for your help.

We are fundraising right now to cover our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work. Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Supreme Court Will Meet Next Month to Revisit Landmark Marriage Equality Ruling0527-10-2025
2Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Request to Overturn E. Jean Carroll Verdict0729-06-2026
3Supreme Court Rules Against Trans Athletes in Verdict Replete With Transphobia-8630-06-2026
4High Court Declines To Review Under-21 Gun Sale Bans0530-06-2026
5Trump Slams 'Fake' E. Jean Carroll Case in Meltdown — After Supreme Court Rejects Prez's Bid to Appeal $5Million Verdict-5329-06-2026
6Supreme Court won't block Texas from enforcing a law...0506-07-2026
7SCOTUS Declines To Hear Chinese Tariffs Case 0516-06-2026
8Justices Skip Pork Case Over Alito, Kavanaugh Objections0530-06-2026
9Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship0530-06-2026
105 takeaways from Supreme Court's landmark decision day0730-06-2026

Классификация: Международные. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5. Источник: truthout.org.