Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Why is the Lorentz Force always perpendicular to velocity?

Дата публикации: 19-06-2026 22:49:37



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

pervect

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

JiuBeixin said:

TL;DR: Exploring the relativistic origin of Lorentz force. I'm deriving how a transverse force (from length contraction) and a longitudinal force (from relativistic momentum compensation) combine to stay perpendicular to velocity.

After thinking about this some, I think you have gotten some good advice when you suggested you wanted to learn more about transformation laws.

Maxwell's equations are fully relativistic. If you know how to properly transform charges and currents (usually expressed as charge density and current density), you can use Maxwell's equations to answer your questions. Judging by your questions, you don't currently even know the name of the Lorentz transform - apologies if I got this wrong).

You give the impression of not having any questions about Maxwell's equations (in the most basic form, two Gauss' laws, Faraday's law, and Ampere's law), but rather about the relativistic aspects.

There's a standardized way of describing the source terms. This is in terms of charge density, which would be coulomb/meter^3, and current density, which would be ampere's per meter^2.

The tool you need to know how these quantities transform when switching from a rest frame to a moving frame is called the Lorentz transform, and that's what you need to research.

It'd also be helpful to know the terms "Lorentz boost", which is the way we describe going from a "stationary" frame of reference to a moving frame of reference, and the term "invariant". Invariants are quantites that don't change when you perform a Lorentz boost, I.e. switch from a stationary frame to a moving frame.

The notable invariant of charge and current doesn't have a catchy name, but is given by the quantity

$$c^2 \rho^2 - |J|^2$$

where c is the speed of light, ##\rho## is the charge density in coulomb's/meter^3, and J is the current density in amperes / m^2.

Note that one point of this is that when we boost a neutral current carrying wire in the direction of current flow, it becomes charged. Which you seem to be aware of.

As far as sources go, the results of a "swarm of particles" are well known, but I don't know of many texts that go through the actual work of analyzing a swarm of particles. Usually they just present the results for the continuum limit.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Why is gravity a fictitious force?0527-06-2026
2A question about special relativity0521-05-2026
3Am I understanding the concept of proper frame of reference?0520-12-2025
4Regarding Relativity of Simultaneity, is non-local "now" impossible?0513-02-2026
5With gravitational lensing, which way is down?0509-03-2026
6Special relativity and diffracting beams0504-06-2026
7Why is there gauge freedom in ADM formalism?0528-06-2026
8Gravitational analog of electromagnetic force0528-01-2026
9Question about Parallel Transport0513-12-2025
10Why Do Events Freeze For Me at the Speed of Light?0518-12-2025

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5. Источник: www.physicsforums.com.