Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Privacy of Voter Eligibility Forms for People in Guardianship Proceedings

Дата публикации: 07-07-2026 19:21:19

You can find the 5-2 opinion in Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. Secord here. From the introduction to the majority opinion by Justice Protasiewicz:
The Wisconsin Voter Alliance seeks access to Notice of Voting Eligibility forms (“NVE forms”) under Wisconsin… Continue reading
The post Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Privacy of Voter Eligibility Forms for People in Guardianship Proceedings appeared first on Election Law Blog.


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

You can find the 5-2 opinion in Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. Secord here. From the introduction to the majority opinion by Justice Protasiewicz:

The Wisconsin Voter Alliance seeks access to Notice of Voting Eligibility forms (“NVE forms”) under Wisconsin public records law. Courts use NVE forms to communicate to election officials or agencies that a person subject to guardianship proceedings has been found incompetent to vote. The Alliance filed a public records request with the Walworth County register in probate and brought this mandamus action seeking disclosure of completed NVE forms. The circuit court held that the forms should not be released, and the court of appeals, on remand from this court, affirmed.

Our decision today is rooted in the legislature’s choice to protect the privacy of individuals subject to guardianship proceedings. The legislature said, with limited exceptions, “court records pertinent to the finding of incompetency are closed.” WIS. STAT. § 54.75 (2021–22). We hold that the NVE forms at issue here are “closed” under that statute. Thus, the Alliance does not have a right to the forms under our public records law, and the Alliance is not entitled to a writ of mandamus.

UPI has this story on today’s decision, and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel this one, which notes that the leader of the group seeking the records “was previously hired by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman as an investigator in a fruitless, taxpayer-funded review of the 2020 election.”

Post navigation

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1“How inconsistent standards led to dozens of disenfranchised voters in a Wisconsin city”-2706-07-2026
2“The War Over Who Controls Elections in a Key Midterm Battleground”0506-07-2026
3Federal District Court Quashes DOJ Attempt to Get a “Staggering” Amount of Personal Data from Fulton County, Georgia Workers and Volunteers Who Helped Run and Certify the 2020 Elections10807-07-2026
4“What Is Civil Society’s Transformative Vision for Democracy?”0507-07-2026
5A Two-Fisted Attack on Voting-5607-07-2026
6Center for Inclusive Democracy Webinar: “Dismantling of the Voting Rights Act: The Consequences of Reshaping Access and Representation in the U.S.”0507-07-2026
7Justices uphold state law allowing for late-arriving mail-in ballots0529-06-2026
8Supremes Open Thread-6430-06-2026
9 A Supreme Court case could help entrench Republican power -2623-10-2025
10US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot challenge0530-06-2026

Классификация: Общество. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 5. Источник: electionlawblog.org.