Read More

It’s not surprising that Wharton Vice Dean of AI and Analytics Eric Bradlow heralds artificial intelligence as the most consequential innovation of his lifetime. The name of the technology is part of his job title, after all.

Bradlow, a computer scientist and statistician, loves AI for its ability to sort large amounts of data and solve complex problems in seconds. But the educator in Bradlow also loves AI for its ability to democratize knowledge, especially in business.

“You could argue it’s taken away my superpower, which is [that] I can code better than you, and I can design algorithms better than you,” he said.

Now, agentic models such as Claude Code or ChatGPT enable everyone to be a data analyst with a few prompts at the keyboard — no coding skills required.

“The way most of us did business in the old days [was], ‘Let me call over to the data science group and have them analyze the data.’ All of us can do this right now at our fingertips. I think this is a great thing,” he said. “Anything that democratizes what I call empirically driven decision-making is good for business.”

Bradlow acknowledges that AI is creating a titanic labor shift, but he said smart companies will “redistribute talent” rather than get rid of people. He thinks businesses will be followers in the AI revolution, not leaders. They will take their cue from how people embrace the technology in their daily lives.

For college students worried that they will be replaced by AI before their careers even get started, Bradlow advises them to keep studying and developing their critical-thinking skills.

“People ask me all the time, ‘Professor Bradlow, do you regret all the math, computer science, and stat classes you took?’ And maybe it just helps me sleep at night, but I give the same answer all the time: I don’t regret one of them. They taught me how to think in a structured way,” he said. “Last time I checked, when did that go out of style at businesses?”

Read More

For management professor Lindsey Cameron, the most significant innovation of the modern era has its roots in ancient times. The gig economy is known today by big brand names, including Uber, Lyft, Instacart, and DoorDash, that offer on-demand work for freelancers with no commitment or contracts. But the short-term labor market existed long before the logos, apps, and algorithms.

“Think about the docks of Liverpool back in the 1700s or 1800s. You had men hanging out the docks every day, waiting for a ship to come in. They would go and do that work on a piece rate, spot basis. That’s a spot labor market,” she said. “You had women working in their homes, doing piece-rate work on a loom, and they would sell it to peddlers who came by.”

But the gig economy has been transformed by technology and the “move fast, break things” ethos of Silicon Valley, she said. The result has been transformative for society: The gig economy has given employment to millions of people on the periphery of the labor market while offering convenience to consumers. It’s also created a “fissured” labor market, even for skilled professionals.

“Gone are the days when, in 40 years, you might [retire and] get a watch,” Cameron said.

She said it’s hard to predict where the gig economy will be in 50 years. Consumer demand is constantly changing, and it’s unclear whether gig companies such as Uber can be profitable in the long term. In addition, the need for more regulation and organizational scaffolding around these companies may lead them to become cottage industries.

“If that happens, will the gig economy actually end up looking more like traditional industries that we know of today, or from the ’90s or the aughts?” she said.

Read More

Wharton management professor Peter Cappelli thinks the most important innovation in business over the last two centuries has been scientific management, a concept that was invented in Philadelphia with support from the University of Pennsylvania.

Often called “Taylorism,” scientific management began with Frederick Winslow Taylor. He was a wealthy, well-educated man from the suburb of Germantown who planned to become a lawyer like his father. But struggling with poor eyesight, Taylor decided to go to work in a Philadelphia production facility as a machinist during the late 1800s. He began to notice that other workers were moving slowly and inefficiently.

“He tried to get the team he was working with to speed things up. They didn’t really want to do it, so he set about trying to figure out how you could reorganize simple tasks, starting in manufacturing, to make them more efficient and go faster,” said Cappelli, who serves as director of the Wharton Center for Human Resources.

Taylor paired up with Eadweard Muybridge, a photographer who pioneered photography as a science by taking pictures of people and animals in motion to study their movements. Penn sponsored his work.

Taylor used Muybridge’s photography to develop scientific management, which forever changed production. Worker discretion was replaced with systemized workflows to separate tasks and increase efficiency. Cappelli said the process is still widely used today. In a hair salon, for example, a trainee washes hair while a high-skilled stylist cuts, and another person checks out the customer.

“That’s Taylorism. The idea is, we’re going to take a job and we’re going to figure out the separate tasks. We’re going to move the simple tasks to cheaper people, so that the stylist is only doing the stylist work,” he said. “You see this all the way around you. We don’t even think about it now.”

Scientific management was not without backlash. The professor noted that psychologist Elton Mayo’s subsequent research in a Philadelphia textile mill led to the human resources movement in the 1920s. It was aimed at balancing the needs of production with worker satisfaction.

Cappelli sees the same struggle now with artificial intelligence.

“At the moment, what we have is a battle going on because the AI people are retaking control, in some cases, away from employees, and trying to do a sort of top-down reorganization of work,” he said.

Read More

The U.S. Federal Reserve isn’t the oldest central bank in the world, but Peter Conti-Brown believes it’s the most important. Its creation in 1913 helped the United States transition from a financial backwater to the most influential banking system on the planet.

“The U.S. dollar is now the rail on which the global economy runs, and the Federal Reserve is its chief engineer,” said Conti-Brown, a Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics. “Even today, in the midst of conflict and geopolitical uncertainty, even in the midst of technological revolutions and AI and crypto, the U.S. dollar is still king.”

The Fed issues currency, safeguards liquidity, oversees banking transactions, and determines interest rates. Conti-Brown said setting monetary policy is big job, one that is vital to the economic health of both nations and individuals.

“For a central bank to do its job well, it can’t just turn on the spigot and blast dollars or currency anywhere there is a demand for it,” he explained. “What the central bank does, and the reason it’s important to exist separate from the government, is to manage that flow of currency. And managing it means that you provide as much money as the system needs — not more, not less.”

Conti-Brown emphasized the need to insulate the Fed from politicians whose desire to inject more cash into the system is often at odds with sound monetary policy. Too much cash causes inflation, which can lead to stagflation, which stifles business growth. Multiple crises, including a punishing oil embargo by OPEC nations, contributed to stagflation in the early 1970s. 

“Inflation ended up in the high teens in the United States, with unemployment following close behind,” Conti-Brown said. “Now in 2026, we see inflation still stubbornly above target.”

He said the Fed currently is facing three challenges: geopolitical uncertainty, artificial intelligence, and cryptocurrency. He doesn’t think the banking system will decentralize, but it’s unclear how it may change.

“I suspect that, because of the political accountability that the Fed offers, the politicians will always see in a central bank a solution to a very specific problem,” he said. “But that doesn’t make it easy to understand how the Federal Reserve will interact with an increasingly digital and digitized financial infrastructure.”

Read More

Before Bank of America created the first general purpose credit card in 1958, consumers were constrained in purchasing. Credit existed, but it was limited to single merchants. Shoppers couldn’t carry debt over time without taking out a loan, which was a cumbersome process.

Credit cards were “a big innovation that changed the world of economics, finance, and consuming, and really were a big boost to the consumer economy that we have here in the U.S.,” said Wharton professor Itay Goldstein, who chairs the Department of Finance. 

He said credit cards helped stimulate economic growth through increased consumer spending, which expanded the finance industry. Although credit card companies are separate from banks, they both participate in the same system.

“It certainly had a big effect, shaping the structure of the industry and opening up more channels for financial intermediation, and eventually, for the profits that this industry can make,” Goldstein said.

Of course, with every great innovation comes a downside. Credit cards typically carry high interest rates, and card users can quickly accumulate more debt than they can afford. Credit card debt in the U.S. stands at $1.25 trillion and is the fourth-largest category of debt behind mortgages, auto loans, and student loans, according to the Federal Reserve.

“At the same time that it stimulates the economy, it also allows people to have excessive debt,” Goldstein said. “There are a lot of studies and findings documenting that people are not always managing their finances in the most effective way. Sometimes they get themselves into debt, and they might go into bankruptcy. This introduces some financial fragility.”

He expects the credit card industry to continue evolving as it faces new challenges from digital currencies and artificial intelligence. Not only is AI changing how companies screen borrowers, it’s also helping individuals better manage their personal finances to avoid debt.

“The AI agent is going to identify all sorts of mistakes that people make in the management of their money,” he said. “If those mistakes and biases are going to be eliminated because of agentic AI, then the ability to make a profit in this industry could decrease.”

Read More

Wharton finance professor Michael Roberts cites private equity as one of the most significant inventions in recent history for the way it has changed business ownership and management.

Private equity concentrates ownership and control of the company among a select few investors, as opposed to public trading that allows a large, diverse base of investors. Roberts said that limited control helps drive value-based decision-making throughout the layers of the company, from the front line to the C-suite.

“PE has given investors a new governance mechanism through which they can enact change and create value,” he said.

Private equity was born in the 1940s and grew up in the 1980s, when the business world went through a wave of acquisitions that resulted in a number of very large firms. Roberts said the development of primary and secondary markets for high-yield bonds was another factor in the growth of PE.

“High-yield bonds provided the fuel, the financing, for private equity to buy these inefficient organizations and restructure them in ways that allocated capital more effectively,” he said.

The biggest benefit of PE is active investors who want to make evidence-based decisions that help companies thrive, particularly smaller ones, Roberts said. They aren’t just passive stockholders waiting for the money to roll in.

“I can’t give all the credit to private equity. That’s been in concert with the growth of business education,” he said. “Private equity’s emphasis on value-based, rigorous, data-driven decision-making has really benefited businesses, both in terms of their investors as well as their employees.”

Roberts said PE is now omnipresent. Its investments are showing up in various sectors, including through pension and sovereign wealth funds. It’s so ubiquitous that he sees the lines blurring between private and public equity, and private and public debt. “Fifty years from now, I just don’t see a distinction anymore.”

As for how artificial intelligence might change private equity, Roberts thinks PE will temper the “mass hysteria” around AI.

“This is where private equity is particularly well-positioned,” he said. “Because it’s in their DNA to approach decision-making — whether it’s for a new building or a new AI implementation — by thinking rigorously about what matters for value.”

Read More

If there was ever a perfect storm of innovation, it might have been the moving assembly line. Wharton management professor Christian Terwiesch explained how all the elements came together in the early 1900s to form this workflow technique that’s still in use today, despite the persistent criticism of mass-produced goods.

“I know that people like to romanticize about craftsmanship. I, too, prefer a dinner made by a craftsman’s chef that was cooked just for me, over the food in the Penn cafeteria. But that just does not scale. It is not affordable. So, the idea of a process, of a flow, of an assembly line, remains critical today,” said Terwiesch, who is also co-director of the Mack Institute for Innovation Management.  

Some iteration of the assembly line has been in use for centuries, but Henry Ford is credited with establishing the moving assembly line for car production in 1913. Ford reportedly was inspired by a visit to a meat-packing plant, where he saw animals moved through a line for processing. He implemented the same idea at his factory, so the car “flows to the worker, as opposed to the worker going to the car,” Terwiesch said.

The professor noted four key factors in the development of the moving assembly line: advances in precision machining, the emergence of scientific management principles, increasing demand for cars from a rising middle class, and increasing supply of unskilled labor from immigrants.

“We have to acknowledge that the assembly line has at times been tough on the workforce, and it does not apply in all settings,” he said. “But it has made products like the car affordable to the mass market. It has given jobs and economic opportunities to millions of people. From a historical perspective, the assembly line was in part what helped the United States win World War II.”

Terwiesch said he is concerned that the U.S. has developed “muscle atrophy” with the loss of assembly-line manufacturing, and he worries it could affect the nation’s global rank.

“If you want to win a war, you need to be able to produce stuff. The same is true for the war on climate change,” he said. “If we want to change the production process in our world for the better, we need cars that are running electric. We need to produce batteries, we need to produce solar systems. All of that requires mass production, and that requires the assembly line.”

Read More

Before artificial intelligence, streaming services, and cell phones, there was the internet. And for Kevin Werbach, there is no bigger breakthrough.

“The thing about the internet is that it truly is everywhere. Not just physically everywhere, but everywhere in business. There’s hardly any corner of the earth that isn’t touched by the internet,” said Werbach, a professor of legal studies and business ethics.

Today’s internet evolved from a government project in the late 1960s called ARPANET or Advanced Research Projects Agency Network. It was the first packet-switching network that allowed disconnected computers to “talk” to each other. Fast-forward to the mid-1990s, and the World Wide Web was born. No longer the domain of academics and government researchers, the information superhighway was wide open, offering an on-ramp to the digital age for all of humanity.

“That is something that we never really had before in history: a common open platform that anyone could build on in new ways,” Werbach said. “It became a platform for voice and video and the cloud, and now AI.”

Werbach, who is also faculty lead for the Wharton Accountable AI Lab, draws a direct line from the open protocols of the internet to generative artificial intelligence.

“AI technology is its own distinct technology, but it would not possibly ever have emerged and certainly had the impact that it’s had so quickly if the internet was not there to build on,” he said.

Whether it’s online shopping or video calls, the internet has been so integrated into human existence that most people take it for granted, and Werbach suspects its origin story will be lost to the dustbin of history.

“I think 50 years from now it will be even hard to remember that story, that this was something that happened almost by accident,” he said. “The fact that we have one network that is decentralized so anyone can connect to it around the world through open protocols, that was kind of a miracle.”

Read More

Modern advertising and brand management emerged alongside mass production, national distribution, mass media, and increasingly anonymous markets. As manufacturers began selling goods far beyond local communities, they faced a new challenge: creating recognition, trust, and preference among consumers who no longer knew the maker personally.

“Consumers, instead of buying from their local neighbor and buying a locally made product, were buying in a more anonymous way. They were buying from large stores, from companies they didn’t really know very well. This practice of building a brand identity was a shortcut to building trust and differentiation in the marketplace,” said Patti Williams, Wharton marketing professor and vice dean of Wharton Executive Education.

Brands soon evolved beyond signals of reliability. Advertising attached products to aspirations, lifestyles, and identity, making consumption a way for people to express who they were — or wanted to become.

“Brands start to cohere into systems of meaning, and along with that comes the idea that consumption can be something I do to give myself meaning in my life. It can tell people who I am,” she said.

Procter & Gamble illustrates that shift. Founded in the late 1830s as a soap and candle maker, the company became a model for modern brand management by bringing consistent, recognizable products to fragmented markets through coordinated branding and mass distribution.

“You get companies like Procter & Gamble realizing that they can reach into these very fragmented local markets and deliver very consistent, high-quality products that they suddenly have mass distribution access to,” Williams said.

Brand management also helped drive the systematic study of consumer behavior. Today that work increasingly relies on big data and AI, but Williams said marketers’ central challenge remains judgment: understanding what consumers value, what evidence matters, what is distinctive, and what a brand can credibly stand behind.

Looking ahead, Williams said marketers may increasingly act as showrunners, ensuring brands remain coherent across expanding channels, partners, platforms, and AI-enabled interactions.

“The role that I have in my mind is this idea of a marketer or a brand manager as a showrunner,” she said. “They’re creating the arc of this brand story. But they’re doing it across a range of players who all have to come together and collaborate, and they have to do it in a way that makes sure that it stays true to their story.”

Read More

The personal computer is so essential to modern living that it’s hard to imagine a time before the laptop and desktop. Knowledge was trapped within the pages of books, documents were prepped on a typewriter, and sharing information took a lot more than a click.

That’s why Wharton operations, information and decisions professor Lynn Wu thinks the personal computer is the most monumental of achievements. For businesses, it democratized knowledge and accelerated productivity.

“Personal computing decentralized the decisions from institutions to individuals at the firm. This is revolutionary,” she said. “In the past, if you wanted to make some kind of analysis, you [would] sign up with a mainframe computer and hopefully get a slot. But these days, you can just pull data from anywhere and make analyses, whether you are a marketing manager, or operations, or just making some forecasting.”

Personal computers came about in the 1970s and took off for home use in the 1980s. Wu noted three factors that made PCs possible: the invention of microprocessors, the growth of the knowledge economy, and a cultural shift toward more experimentation.

“Lots of people are tinkering with these computers on the edges to see where we can push this machine, this new form of technology,” she said.

The history of the personal computer is tied to the University of Pennsylvania. In the 1940s, colleagues at the university’s engineering school built the ENIAC or Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer. Developed with a government contract, the ENIAC was meant to help the war effort by calculating artillery ranges.

“When we’re looking back at the personal computer, it’s less about the hardware, but really about decentralization of human intelligence for the first time,” Wu said. “It rewired the economy in terms of how information is aggregated and distributed across the world. And we’re going to see something similar, or even more dramatic, in the age of AI.”

Read More

The development of the internet paved the way for social media, which has been one of the most transformative innovations to travel down the information superhighway, said Wharton marketing professor Pinar Yildirim.

Yildirim, who studies social media and information economics, said the emergence of social media platforms forever changed communication. It has changed the way individuals talk to each other, the way companies conduct business and relate to consumers, and the way news and information is disseminated.

“The thing with traditional news media was that it was one-sided,” she said. “You had an authority, an individual who might be a journalist or an expert, deciding what should be communicated with the public, at what time, in which manner. Media communication was gated and one-sided.”

Social media, which started in the late 1990s and proliferated in the aughts, changed that dynamic by giving communication power to the people. And its immense popularity meant firms had to figure out how to harness that power.

“It’s impossible for a brand to exist without having some degree of social media presence,” Yildirim said. “They have to keep an eye on their customers. They have to listen to them on social media. They have to work with influencers. They have to make sure that they are presenting their products and their brand and telling the story on social media in an effective way.”

The pressure extends to companies across the spectrum. Financial firms, for instance, use social media to gauge reactions to changes in the markets. And small businesses can tap into a much larger pool of customers than through the old method of advertising in the local newspaper or TV station.

“Social media is a place where new brands are launched, where artists launch their careers, and politicians start their political campaigns,” Yildirim said. “It’s very important for businesses, for public personalities, and for individuals to pay attention to.” 

Despite its benefits, social media hasn’t always helped people make meaningful connections. Yildirim noted the pitfalls, including isolation, echo chambers, and concerns about how artificial intelligence can help spread disinformation and misinformation.

“AI can facilitate the creation of content that is fake but looks highly authentic,” she said. “This is something that we have to keep an eye on looking forward, and this might be an aspect of social media that we will be remembering 50 years from now.”