Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Supreme Court inadvertently hands progressives super weapon against GOP: analysis

Дата публикации: 05-07-2026 14:04:35


The Supreme Court has radically expanded President Donald Trump's executive power, but its latest ruling may have inadvertently handed Democrats and progressives a powerful weapon against the GOP, legal columnist Jason Willick argued in a Sunday op-ed.That ruling was the court’s decision last week in Trump v. Slaughter, which significantly expanded the president’s control over independent federal agencies by allowing him to remove officials at will. The ruling overturns a landmark 1935 ruling that prevented former President Franklin D. Roosevelt from ousting a Republican who stood in the way of his progressive New Deal economic agenda.As such, Willick argued in an op-ed published in The Washington Post, Democrats and progressives may be well poised to enact an agenda of their choosing once they reclaim the White House.“Independent agencies thrived in the mid-20th century, when the United States was unified enough that many government functions could be framed as apolitical. The agencies also coexisted with Democrats’ ‘neoliberal’ vision of the economy, in which technocratic regulators would manage capitalism with a (relatively) light touch,” Willick wrote.“Neither of those two conditions operate today. The country is sharply polarized, so Democrats and Republicans increasingly make demands of regulated companies that are incompatible. The prospect of a bipartisan, multimember body arriving at an expert consensus on a politically charged merger, or climate regulation, or a race-conscious hiring initiative, seems remote.”As a result, federal agencies are likely to “now be even more potent partisan tools,” Willick argued, something he suspected “many on the left will come to embrace.”“Like Roosevelt, the next Democratic president won’t have much time for legacy Republican commissioners trying to frustrate their agencies’ progressive advance,” Willick wrote.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

U.S. Supreme Court justices pose for their group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., October 7, 2022. Seated (L-R): Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Samuel A. Alito, Jr. and Elena Kagan. Standing (L-R): Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

The Supreme Court has radically expanded President Donald Trump's executive power, but its latest ruling may have inadvertently handed Democrats and progressives a powerful weapon against the GOP, legal columnist Jason Willick argued in a Sunday op-ed.

That ruling was the court’s decision last week in Trump v. Slaughter, which significantly expanded the president’s control over independent federal agencies by allowing him to remove officials at will. The ruling overturns a landmark 1935 ruling that prevented former President Franklin D. Roosevelt from ousting a Republican who stood in the way of his progressive New Deal economic agenda.

As such, Willick argued in an op-ed published in The Washington Post, Democrats and progressives may be well poised to enact an agenda of their choosing once they reclaim the White House.

“Independent agencies thrived in the mid-20th century, when the United States was unified enough that many government functions could be framed as apolitical. The agencies also coexisted with Democrats’ ‘neoliberal’ vision of the economy, in which technocratic regulators would manage capitalism with a (relatively) light touch,” Willick wrote.

“Neither of those two conditions operate today. The country is sharply polarized, so Democrats and Republicans increasingly make demands of regulated companies that are incompatible. The prospect of a bipartisan, multimember body arriving at an expert consensus on a politically charged merger, or climate regulation, or a race-conscious hiring initiative, seems remote.”

As a result, federal agencies are likely to “now be even more potent partisan tools,” Willick argued, something he suspected “many on the left will come to embrace.”

“Like Roosevelt, the next Democratic president won’t have much time for legacy Republican commissioners trying to frustrate their agencies’ progressive advance,” Willick wrote.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Expert flabbergasted as court issues 'high-stakes judicial intervention' against Trump-2705-07-2026
2La Cour suprême élargit un peu plus les pouvoirs de Donald Trump dans une décision historique0529-06-2026
3Trump panics as Dems mobilize behind new plan: ‘They do this and the GOP is dead!’-3605-07-2026
4Stati Uniti. La Corte Suprema ha allargato alcuni poteri del presidente. Oggi la decisione sullo ius soli0730-06-2026
5Trump could be sued by 1M people over ‘mind-boggling’ corruption: ex-official-5705-07-2026
6Sordid Trump ally's rejection at the Supreme Court astounds legal expert-5606-07-2026
7Panic in GOP as Trump hoards much-needed campaign cash: report-6706-07-2026
8Appeals court skeptical of Trump tariff authority0731-07-2025
9Supreme Court allows Trump to terminate deportation protections for Haitians, Syrians  -3725-06-2026

Классификация: Международные. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: -6. Информативность: 7. Источник: www.rawstory.com.