PFAS Ruling Extinguishes A Policyholder Path To Coverage

Дата публикации: 23-10-2026 12:33:21

Following an Ohio federal court's recent ruling in Fire-Dex v. Admiral Insurance, policyholders whose PFAS exposure is concentrated in workplace products will see bids for coverage fail under the occupational-disease exclusion, giving insurers a defense well suited for the category of claims that has been most resistant to pollution exclusions, say attorneys at Benesch.

Схожие новости

#	Наименование новости	Тональность	Информативность	Дата публикации
1	Textile Co. Not Covered In PFAS-Tainted Water Suit, Court Told	0	8.96	27-07-2026
2	AIG Unit Must Face Trial Over Allocation Of Crash Settlement	0	4.9	20-07-2026
3	AIG Loses Bid To Escape Chemical Co.'s $2.9M Pollution Deal	0	7	01-07-2026
4	Insurer Doesn’t Get a Mulligan in $12M Georgia Solar Farm Claim, Appeals Court Says	0	7.53	23-10-2026
5	6th Circ. Backs Insurers In $6.3M Crypto Fire Loss Suit	0	6.14	16-10-2026
6	Insurer Seeks To Curb Coverage For Talc Co. Asbestos Suits	0	8.06	15-10-2026
7	NC Co.'s $9.8M Indemnity Payment Not Covered, Insurers Say	0	5	13-07-2026
8	GKN Isn't Covered For Toxic Chemical Emergency, Court Told	0	5.56	13-10-2026
9	Auto Parts Shop's Inventory Claim Barred By Other Coverage	0	6.47	14-10-2026

Классификация: Экономика. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 10.4. Источник: www.law360.com.