Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W review

Дата публикации: 14-07-2026 14:23:40

Lara Dunn likes the Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W shoe - her lightest on test - but for one factor.
The post Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W review appeared first on TGO Magazine.


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

: out of 5

Lara Dunn

Lara Dunn

14 July 2026 / 15:23 BST14 July 2026 / 15:29 BST

Lara Dunn likes the Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W shoe - her lightest on test - but for one factor.

Overview
  • Overall Rating

    : 3 out of 5

Lara Dunn likes the Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W shoe – her lightest on test – but for one factor.

The lightest on test by quite some margin, the Arc’Teryx Kopec GTX W shoe endeavours to deliver a blend of performance and comfort in a package with no weight penalty.

Quick specs
Price: $180 | £160 (available from Ellis Brigham)
Weight: 522g (for UK6/EU39 1/3)
Material: CORDURAÒ mesh upper, molded TPU toe cap and heel, PFAS-free Gore-Tex membrane
Features: Durable CORDURAÒ mesh upper, asymmetric TPU toe cap, Vibram MegaGrip outsole, TPU midfoot shank
Heel to Toe Drop: 7.7mm
Lug Depth: 4mm
Waterproof?: Gore-Tex membrane
Sizes: UK3.5-8.5
Men’s version: yes
arcteryx.com

A tough but lightweight CORDURA® mesh upper features TPU bumpers in high wear areas and for extra structure, a TPU midfoot shank works with the dual-density midsole to give support and stability, while a lightweight Vibram MegaGrip outsole takes care of the underfoot business. So far so good. The shoe promises a lot on paper and certainly delivers an excellent combination of great grip in a variety of conditions, good levels of support and underfoot comfort and agility. The tough mesh upper is both breathable and protective, keeping out any water (the way the tongue is fixed to the upper helps with this too, minimalizing points of ingress for water).

The fit accommodates a mid-broad forefoot in comfort, giving plenty of space for the toes to move thanks to the asymmetric toebox and I experienced no issues with heel lift despite a fairly simple lacing system. I’d have liked to have been able to fine tune the lacing a little more, but the real problem was the point at which the tongue and the main body of the shoe area stitched together under the laces. When the shoes were laced up snugly (not overtight!) the seam at the edge of the tongue pushed against the sensitive upper foot below my ankle, making a long walk really quite uncomfortable no matter how much I adjusted the tongue and the lacing. The presence of some sort of loop for the laces to go through as some hiking and running shoes feature might have helped, but here the tongue could move and create pressure. This felt like a huge shame in what is a nimble, grippy, stable and versatile shoe otherwise, that could otherwise have been a winner.

How we tested

Lara used the shoes in all the weathers (!) in late winter and spring, on a mix of walks both with and without a pack, in the Malvern Hills, Brecon Beacons and Black Mountains. She usually takes a UK5.5/6 shoe and has a medium width foot but narrow heels.  This review was first published in the August 2026 issue of The Great Outdoors. Compare it with others in our guide to the best hiking shoes.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Aku Aira V-Light GTX W review012.4214-07-2026
2La Sportiva TX4 Evo W’s GTX review011.3914-07-2026
3Fjallraven Keb GTX Jacket W review07.2115-07-2026
4Meindl Lite Trail GTX review08.3614-07-2026
5Keen Targhee Apex Waterproof review08.414-07-2026
6Smartwool Women’s Hike Targeted Cushion Crew Socks review06.2823-03-2026
7Helly Hansen Cascade HELLY TECH waterproof low review05.6714-07-2026
8Didriksons Varja jacket review09.1421-07-2026
9Helly Hansen Women’s Relay Backpack RECCO® review06.6509-07-2026
10Arc’teryx Atom Hoody review09.2316-07-2026

Классификация: Арктика. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 7.37. Источник: www.thegreatoutdoorsmag.com.