Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2026,

Дата публикации: 20-10-2026 08:36:23



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Skip to main content
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date Oct 8, 2026
  • Featured
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,720
Reaction score
7,821
Henri B. Kagan, Université Paris-Sud, France
Kenso Soai, Tokyo University of Science, Japan

“for the discovery of non-linear effects and autocatalysis in asymmetric organic synthesis”

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2026/press-release/
Life’s chemistry is what chemists call homochiral, after the Greek words for “same” and “hand”. Like hands, all amino acids exist as two mirrored variants, but only one of them is found in the proteins in your cells. The other is rarely found in nature.

For a long time, chemists wondered how homochirality can emerge. When they began to experiment with chemical reactions that can form two mirrored molecules, they always obtained equal proportions of both in their test tubes. However, chemists strived to produce only one of these mirror images, because in the development of molecules that will interact with living beings – such as in pharmaceuticals – only one mirror image will have the desired effect.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2026 recognises discoveries that have enabled chemists to drive chemical reactions that lead to homochirality.

“Henri Kagan and Kenso Soai have provided a solution to a chemical mystery that is over a century old: how homochirality can emerge spontaneously. The chemical reactions they have developed are spectacular,” says Heiner Linke, chair of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry.

Discussion
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,858
Reaction score
12,751
Mayhem
Messages
453
Reaction score
334
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,720
Reaction score
7,821
Mentor
Messages
29,217
Reaction score
4,650
This is basically kind of a process I remember being suggested even before their works (I learned about it in the early eighties, and I strongly doubt it was a fresh one then). The idea is that of a self-enforcing change: imagine you have a bag of black and white marbles. You draw three at random. If they are identical - return them. If one is different from two others: change its color and return three identical marbles to the bag. This is an unstable equilibrium - initially nothing happens, but at some point for purely statistical reasons one color starts to dominate and then it is kind of a runaway reaction, everything changes quickly either to black, or white.

In a way Kenso Sai work implements this.

Mayhem
Messages
453
Reaction score
334
This is basically kind of a process I remember being suggested even before their works (I learned about it in the early eighties, and I strongly doubt it was a fresh one then). The idea is that of a self-enforcing change: imagine you have a bag of black and white marbles. You draw three at random. If they are identical - return them. If one is different from two others: change its color and return three identical marbles to the bag. This is an unstable equilibrium - initially nothing happens, but at some point for purely statistical reasons one color starts to dominate and then it is kind of a runaway reaction, everything changes quickly either to black, or white.

In a way Kenso Sai work implements this.

I'm not aware of the scope of Soai's work, i.e. how many instances of the Soai reaction have been discovered, but the molecules studied seem highly specific, especially the presented "tert-butyl alkyne" derivative.
Mentor
Messages
29,217
Reaction score
4,650

Yes, and that makes me doubt this is really the answer we are looking for. Still, an interesting system, and definitely proves there is no need for magic nor divine intervention :wink:
Mayhem
Messages
453
Reaction score
334
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,136
Reaction score
978
Mentor
Messages
29,217
Reaction score
4,650

No.

And generally speaking: their discovery doesn't "solve" anything. It proves the solution can exist and can be rooted in a natural process. But none of the examples they found seems "practical" - as in "possible to appear in a typical mix of naturally existing reagents we expect to see in the primordial soup".

Mayhem
Messages
453
Reaction score
334
No.

And generally speaking: their discovery doesn't "solve" anything. It proves the solution can exist and can be rooted in a natural process. But none of the examples they found seems "practical" - as in "possible to appear in a typical mix of naturally existing reagents we expect to see in the primordial soup".

I have pondered if heterogenous reactions could be a potential lead for the question.

Soai's work demonstrates how homochirality can be self-amplifying, rendering the single-origin of chiral biomolecules plausible. Since the primordial soup existed in the primordial cauldron of the ancient Earth, I wonder if there existed certain minerals with a surface structure that allowed for stereospecific chemistry. Here I refer to how the active site of enzymes can be stereospecific due to their three-dimensional structure, although these active sites also involve asymmetric biomolecules, which challenges the self-consistency of the idea.

If we assume there exists / was such a mineral with a stereospecific surface structure, it still begs the question of why that surface structure was that orientation. As far as I know, it doesn't matter if biology is left or right handed, as long everything remains consistent. That is, if we inverted the configuration of all molecules everywhere at once, it would be indistinguishable in behavior. This necessitates only an initial, arbitrary bias for symmetry, which seems conceptually plausible in the context of geology ... but I'm out of my depth here.

Mentor
Messages
29,217
Reaction score
4,650

Won't give you citations, but I am more than sure I read about the idea years ago - without any conclusions though, just as a speculation.

I started to wonder though: many reactions tend to "keep" chirality of reactants (or to reverse it, depending on the mechanism, but that means they still belong to the same pathway). Technically that could mean initial existence of two separate "kingdoms", L and D, competing for the resources. Once a member of one of the "kingdoms" evolves (at random) to become autotrophic and produce molecules of one type, "kingdom" takes over, as resources of one type become abundant. After that whole system evolves around one chirality, only enforcing its dominance. Pure speculation.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
12026010020-03-2026
22026010017-03-2026
32026 World Endurance Championship0516-07-2026
4The 2026 International Nuclear Science Olympiad Inspires Young Scientists021.1112-08-2026
5SusChem 2026017.0730-09-2026
6Business Awards 2026 – Excellence in the Development of Management and Leadership019.0907-12-2025
7Цхинвал, 202606023-06-2026
8Tour de France 202603528-07-2026
9Formula One Grand Prix 202603007-08-2026
10Нобелевская премия 2026 года. Как лауреаты узнали о победе012.8412-10-2026

Классификация: Наука. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 30. Источник: www.physicsforums.com.