Thanks for the precise follow-up. The existing test table and 20,000 comparisons against an independent 256-bit implementation already cover much of the semantic and differential testing. The 231 execution-spec fixtures generated from the same vectors also provide a clear path for other clients to use them.
The fixed-vector gaps I noted have now been added: zero moduli, signed and modulo division by zero, a shift of exactly 64, and shift amounts with high bits set. That addresses my concern and strengthens the case for consistent independent-client validation.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ERC-8447: Swarm AI Framework | 0 | 8 | 18-10-2026 |
| 2 | EIP-8337: Validated EVM Code | 0 | 6.96 | 14-07-2026 |
| 3 | ERC-8427: Portable Spend Grants | 0 | 12.98 | 18-10-2026 |
| 4 | ERC-8441: Hybrid post-quantum stealth address scheme | 0 | 22.5 | 16-10-2026 |
| 5 | EIP-8445: Common Computational Gas Scaling Factor | 0 | 7.52 | 19-10-2026 |
| 6 | ERC-8419: Know-Your-Agent (KYA) Framework | 0 | 9.74 | 19-10-2026 |
| 7 | ERC-8348: Financial Lease | 0 | 10.87 | 19-10-2026 |
| 8 | ERC-8004: Trustless Agents | 0 | 8.54 | 27-07-2026 |
| 9 | ERC-8100: Representable Contract State | 0 | 5 | 08-07-2026 |
| 10 | EIP-8341: Partial Execution Payload Commitments | 0 | 18.4 | 17-07-2026 |