Proposed federal rules would rely on political appointees to decide how a lot of U.S. science gets done. History shows the consequences of such actions.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fed Science Board Firings Will Weaken Research that Supports Engineering, Critics Say | 0 | 7.6 | 01-05-2026 |
| 2 | In America science-sceptics are now in charge | 0 | 13.78 | 04-02-2026 |
| 3 | These 6 charts show how NIH research funding has been reshaped under Trump | 0 | 9.01 | 24-09-2026 |
| 4 | The cost of drugs from Canada is set to soar for millions of Americans because of a federal rule | 0 | 5.07 | 08-10-2026 |
| 5 | The cost of drugs from Canada is set to soar for millions of Americans because of a federal rule | 0 | 5.07 | 08-10-2026 |
| 6 | Agency diverted $1.4 billion in science funds mandated by Congress | 0 | 7.86 | 03-10-2026 |
| 7 | Clerk Rule Change Unlikely To Trigger Judicial Ethics Probes | 0 | 5.96 | 01-10-2026 |
| 8 | Trump Rejects AI Regulation as Tech CEOs Sign Voluntary “Self-Policing” Accord | 0 | 16.19 | 30-09-2026 |
| 9 | Government Use of AI to Evaluate Proposals Comes Under Scrutiny | 0 | 10 | 06-10-2026 |
| 10 | Citizen Science and the Politics of Knowledge: Monitoring fossil fuel impacts with the ERICA project | 0 | 8.71 | 10-08-2026 |