Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
СпутникиРНSpaceXРоскосмосNASAPublication date: 14 July 2026
Source: Defect and Diffusion Forum Vol. 453
Author(s): Isaac Lare Animasaun
Studying turbulent mixing, stress redistribution, pressure losses, secondary flows, and energy dissipation enhances industrial process efficiency, improves equipment durability, minimizes operational costs, optimizes fluid transport systems, supports design and promotes energy conservation. However, little is known about the influence of outlet geometry on turbulence characteristics (i.e. turbulent kinetic energy, turbulent intensity, effective viscosity , and effective thermal conductivity) in air, water, and kerosene flowing through Y-shaped copper ducts featuring regular, converging, and diverging outlets. A hybrid geometric configuration incorporating angular inlets and asymmetric outlets enables detailed analysis of turbulent mixing, stress redistribution, pressure losses, and secondary flow development in complex internal flow regimes. Numerical simulations were conducted using ANSYS Fluent 2023 R2, employing the shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model for accurate resolution of adverse pressure gradients and boundary-layer effects. High-quality meshing, grid independence validation, and robust solver configurations ensured numerical reliability and convergence. The results demonstrate that outlet geometry significantly influences turbulence intensity, effective viscosity, and thermal conductivity across different working fluids. For air, increasing inlet velocity enhances turbulent kinetic energy and turbulence intensity at the regular outlet, while the diverging outlet exhibits peak turbulence at higher cold-fluid velocities. In water flows, the converging outlet shows substantial turbulence growth under increased velocity conditions, highlighting the role of geometric restriction in enhancing mixing and energy dissipation. For kerosene, the regular outlet achieves maximum effective thermal conductivity due to improved fluid interaction and turbulence under elevated velocity conditions, whereas the diverging outlet exhibits lower viscosity as a consequence of geometric flow dispersion. Overall, the findings underscore the critical role of outlet configuration in determining turbulence behavior and thermal-fluid transport characteristics.
[1] L. Li, I.L. Animasaun, O.K. Koriko, T. Muhammad, T. Elnaqeeb, Insight into turbulent Reynolds number at the regular, converging, and diverging outlets: Dynamics of air, water, and kerosene through Y-shaped cylindrical copper ducts, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 159 (2024) 108044.
[2] P. Raphe, H. Fellouah, S. Poncet, M. Ameur, Ventilation effectiveness of uniform and non-uniform perforated duct diffusers at office room, Build. Environ. 204 (2021) 108118.
[3] K.P. Jiao, W.L. Mo, Z.T. Zhao, J.Q. Li, X.Q. Yang, S.P. Zhang, et al., Characteristics of the Blockage from Air Nozzle Guide Duct in Circulating the Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier and Its Formation Mechanism, ACS Omega 9(6) (2024) 6924-6931.
[4] J. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Chen, Z. Zhang, Design and optimization of the exhaust system for an aviation piston engine, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2879(1) (2024) 012005.
[5] K. Iwata, T. Sekine, I. Tanaka, T. Ando, E. Orita, Turbulent kinetic energy is different from viscous energy loss, Radiographics 40(7) (2020) 2142-2144.
[6] I.S. Ertesvag, B.F. Magnussen, The eddy dissipation turbulence energy cascade model, Combust. Sci. Technol. 159(1) (2000) 213-235.
[7] J.I. Cardesa, A. Vela-Martin, J. Jimenez, The turbulent cascade in five dimensions, Science 357(6353) (2017) 782-784.
[8] L.P. Wang, S. Chen, J.G. Brasseur, J.C. Wyngaard, Examination of hypotheses in the Kolmogorov refined turbulence theory through high-resolution simulations. Part 1. Velocity field, J. Fluid Mech. 309 (1996) 113-156.
[9] A. Liberzon, B. Luthi, M. Guala, W. Kinzelbach, A. Tsinober, Experimental study of the structure of flow regions with negative turbulent kinetic energy production in confined three-dimensional shear flows with and without buoyancy, Phys. Fluids 17(9) (2005) 095110.
DOI: 10.1063/1.2055447
[10] F.Z. Wang, I.L. Animasaun, T. Muhammad, S.S. Okoya, Recent Advancements in Fluid Dynamics: Drag Reduction, Lift Generation, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Turbulence Modelling, and Multiphase Flow, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 49(8) (2024) 10237-10249.
[11] R. Kilpatrick, H. Hangan, K. Siddiqui, D. Parvu, J. Lange, J. Mann, et al., Effect of Reynolds number and inflow parameters on mean and turbulent flow over complex topography, Wind Energy Sci. 1(2) (2016) 237-254.
[12] P. Frenzen, C.A. Vogel, The turbulent kinetic energy budget in the atmospheric surface layer: A review and an experimental reexamination in the field, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 60(1) (1992) 49-76.
DOI: 10.1007/bf00122061
[13] S.S. Thakre, J.B. Joshi, Momentum, mass and heat transfer in single-phase turbulent flow, Rev. Chem. Eng. 18(2-3) (2002) 83-293.
[14] W. Wu, U. Piomelli, Effects of surface roughness on a separating turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 841 (2018) 552-580.
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.101
[15] K. Zhu, W.D. Liu, M.B. Sun, Impacts of periodic disturbances on shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction, Acta Astronaut. 182 (2021) 230-239.
[16] F.G. Carollo, V. Ferro, D. Termini, Analyzing turbulence intensity in gravel bed channels, J. Hydraul. Eng. 131(12) (2005) 1050-1061.
[17] F. Wang, I.L. Animasaun, Q.M. Al-Mdallal, S. Saranya, T. Muhammad, Dynamics through three-inlets of t-shaped ducts: Significance of inlet velocity on transient air and water experiencing cold fronts subject to turbulence, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 148 (2023) 107034.
[18] M.V. Zagarola, A.J. Smits, Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 373 (1998) 33-79.
[19] D. Barkley, B. Song, V. Mukund, G. Lemoult, M. Avila, B. Hof, The rise of fully turbulent flow, Nature 526(7574) (2015) 550-553.
DOI: 10.1038/nature15701
[20] R.S. Barlow, J.P. Johnston, Structure of a turbulent boundary layer on a concave surface, J. Fluid Mech. 191 (1988) 137-176.
[21] W. Rodi (Ed.), Turbulent buoyant jets and plumes: HMT: the science & applications of heat and mass transfer, Vol. 6, Elsevier, 2014.
[22] P. Ricco, M. Skote, M.A. Leschziner, A review of turbulent skin-friction drag reduction by near-wall transverse forcing, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 123 (2021) 100713.
[23] Y. Zhang, Z. Gu, C.W. Yu, Impact factors on airflow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons and comprehensive simulations: A review, Curr. Pollut. Rep. 6 (2020) 425-439.
[24] L.J. Yang, L. Chen, X.Z. Du, Y.P. Yang, Effects of ambient winds on the thermo-flow performances of indirect dry cooling system in a power plant, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 64 (2013) 178-187.
[25] M. Turk, S. Emeis, The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98(8-9) (2010) 466-471.
[26] P.A. Irwin, Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96(6-7) (2008) 701-712.
[27] B. Etkin, Turbulent wind and its effect on flight, J. Aircraft 18(5) (1981) 327-345.
DOI: 10.2514/3.57498
[28] A. Elshaer, G. Bitsuamlak, A. El Damatty, Enhancing wind performance of tall buildings using corner aerodynamic optimization, Eng. Struct. 136 (2017) 133-148.
[29] C.D. Duguid, A.J. Barker, C.A. Jones, Convective turbulent viscosity acting on equilibrium tidal flows: new frequency scaling of the effective viscosity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497(3) (2020) 3400-3417.
[30] Z. Safar, A.Z. Szeri, Thermohydrodynamic Lubrication in Laminar and Turbulent Regimes, J. Lubr. Technol. 96(1) (1974) 48-56.
DOI: 10.1115/1.3451909
[31] R. Moarref, A.S. Sharma, J.A. Tropp, B.J. McKeon, Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels, J. Fluid Mech. 734 (2013) 275-316.
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.457
[32] E.E. Essel, A. Nematollahi, E.W. Thacher, M.F. Tachie, Effects of upstream roughness and Reynolds number on separated and reattached turbulent flow, J. Turbul. 16(9) (2015) 872-899.
[33] N. Petford, Which effective viscosity?, Mineral. Mag. 73(2) (2009) 167-191.
[34] C.M. White, M.G. Mungal, Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40(1) (2008) 235-256.
[35] T. Norton, D.W. Sun, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) - an effective and efficient design and analysis tool for the food industry: a review, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17(11) (2006) 600-620.
[36] A.A. Ahmadi, M. Bahiraei, Thermohydraulic performance optimization of cooling system of an electric arc furnace operated with nanofluid: A CFD study, J. Clean. Prod. 310 (2021) 127451.
[37] K. Dhinsa, C. Bailey, K. Pericleous, Investigation into the performance of turbulence models for fluid flow and heat transfer phenomena in electronic applications, IEEE Trans. Components Packag. Technol. 28(4) (2005) 686-699.
[38] S. Bari, S.N. Hossain, I. Saad, A review on improving airflow characteristics inside the combustion chamber of CI engines to improve the performance with higher viscous biofuels, Fuel 264 (2020) 116769.
[39] C.C. Lee, M.V. Tran, B.T. Tan, G. Scribano, C.T. Chong, A comprehensive review on the effects of additives on fundamental combustion characteristics and pollutant formation of biodiesel and ethanol, Fuel 288 (2021) 119749.
[40] R.K. Sidheshware, S. Ganesan, V. Bhojwani, An overview of viscosity reduction techniques on hydrocarbon fluids, Int. J. Ambient Energy 43(1) (2022) 32-41.
[41] N. Kockmann, J. Tegenkamp, L. Riegger, Rational design of the inlet configuration of flow systems for enhanced mixing: Analysis of Y-mixers and T-mixers, J. Flow Chem. 11(3) (2021) 345-358.
[42] F.M. White, Fluid Mechanics, eighth ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2016.
[43] G. Bergeles, E. Bakalis (Eds.), Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics in Turbulent Ducts with Complex Geometries, first ed., Springer, 1999.
[44] F.R. Menter, Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, No. A-92183 (1992).
[45] F.R. Menter, Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications, AIAA J. 32(8) (1994) 1598-1605.
DOI: 10.2514/3.12149
[46] H. Yu, J. The, Validation and optimization of SST k-omega turbulence model for pollutant dispersion within a building array, Atmos. Environ. 145 (2016) 225-238.
[47] L. Konozsy, The k-omega shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model, in: A New Hypothesis on the Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor for Turbulent Flows, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp.57-66.
[48] F.R. Menter, Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective, Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23(4) (2009) 305-316.
[49] H.K. Versteeg, W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh, 2016.
[50] A. Patsekha, R. Wei, R. Galler, Comparative Analysis of Numerical Methods Regarding the Backflow Investigation in Tunnels of Zentrum am Berg, BHM Berg- Und Huttenmdnnische Monatshefte 167(12) (2022) 566-577.
[51] A.M. Endalew, M. Hertog, M.A. Delele, K. Baetens, T. Persoons, M. Baelmans, et al., CFD modelling and wind tunnel validation of airflow through plant canopies using 3D canopy architecture, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30(2) (2009) 356-368.
[52] P. Mishra, K.R. Aharwal, A review on selection of turbulence model for CFD analysis of air flow within a cold storage, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 402(1) (2018) 012145.
[53] K. Ward, Z.H. Fan, Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods, J. Micromech. Microeng. 25(9) (2015) 094001.
[54] S. Karthikeyan, N. Elumalai, K. Narasingamurthi, Experimental study of developing turbulent flow and heat transfer in ribbed convergent/divergent rectangular ducts, Therm. Sci. 19(6) (2015) 2219-2231.
[55] M.P. Paidoussis, S.J. Price, E. De Langre, Fluid-structure interactions: cross-flow-induced instabilities, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[56] G. Dang, F. Zhong, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, Numerical study of heat transfer deterioration of turbulent supercritical kerosene flow in heated circular tube, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 85 (2015) 1003-1011.
[57] A.A. Ganguli, A.B. Pandit, Computational fluid dynamics simulations to improve performance characteristics of a manifold having a central inlet and outlet, Front. Energy Res. 10 (2022) 1013540.
[58] M.L. Brown, M. Parsheh, C.K. Aidun, Turbulent flow in a converging channel: effect of contraction and return to isotropy, J. Fluid Mech. 560 (2006) 437-448.
[59] P.E. Dimotakis, The mixing transition in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 409 (2000) 69-98.
[60] J. Wan, A. Fan, H. Yao, W. Liu, Effect of thermal conductivity of solid wall on combustion efficiency of a micro-combustor with cavities, Energy Convers. Manage. 96 (2015) 605-612.
[61] O.B. Kanargi, P.S. Lee, C. Yap, A numerical and experimental investigation of heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of a cross-connected alternating converging-diverging channel heat sink, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 106 (2017) 449-464.
[62] L.B. Wang, W.Q. Tao, Q.W. Wang, T.T. Wong, Experimental study of developing turbulent flow and heat transfer in ribbed convergent/divergent square ducts, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 22(6) (2001) 603-613.
[63] I.L. Animasaun, N.A. Shah, A. Wakif, B. Mahanthesh, R. Sivaraj, O.K. Koriko, Ratio of Momentum Diffusivity to Thermal Diffusivity: Introduction, Meta-analysis, and Scrutinization, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2022.
[64] I.L. Animasaun, T. Muhammad, S.-J. Yook, Exploration of Half-Cycle Length of Converging Circular Wavy Duct with Diverging-Outlet: Turbulent Water Dynamics, Adv. Theory Simul. 8(7) (2025) 2500038.
[65] F. Wang, I.L. Animasaun, T. Muhammad, Anisotropic turbulent flow of water through converging wavy-aluminum-circular pipe with five half-cycles: insight into the significance of four-branch minor-inlet angle, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 50(4) (2025) 513-544.