To the Editor We read with great interest the long-term follow-up of the STITCH trial by van den Berg et al, which provides compelling evidence that the small-bites technique reduces the cumulative incidence of incisional hernias by nearly one-third compared with large bites after 13 years. However, while the authors advocate for the small-bites technique as the “standard practice,” we must critically examine the limitations of this evidence and the broader context of abdominal wall surgery.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Small-Bites Closure in Emergency Laparotomy | 0 | 11.29 | 01-09-2026 |
| 2 | Small-Bites Closure in Emergency Laparotomy | 0 | 11.35 | 01-09-2026 |
| 3 | Small-Bites Closure in Emergency Laparotomy—Reply | 0 | 8 | 01-09-2026 |
| 4 | Errors in Dataset for Analysis of Inguinal Hernia Repair Practice | 0 | 6.16 | 01-09-2026 |
| 5 | Robotic vs Laparoscopic Approach for Complex Elective Cholecystectomy | 0 | 5.8 | 01-09-2026 |
| 6 | Errors in Dataset and Analysis | 0 | 7.52 | 01-09-2026 |
| 7 | Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Cholangiography and Bile Duct Injury | 0 | 7.16 | 01-09-2026 |
| 8 | AI-Driven Video-Based Surgical Skill Assessment in Hepatobiliary Laparoscopic Surgery | 0 | 16.28 | 01-09-2026 |
| 9 | Less intraoperative crystalloid fluid not tied to worse surgical outcomes | 0 | 10.37 | 23-09-2026 |
| 10 | Value of Robotic Platforms for Cholecystectomy | 0 | 7.47 | 01-09-2026 |