Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Parent, E., and Bárdossy, A.: The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: Can Failure Stories Contribute to Hydrological Science?, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 849–856, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.506050, 2010. a, b, c

Arentoft, M., Berghmans, S., Borrell-Damian, L., Bottaro, S., Faure, J.-E., Gaillard, V., Glinos, K., Albacete, J. L., Morais, R., Morris, J., Schiltz, M., and Stroobants, K.: Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13480728, 2022. a

Bartoš, F., Maier, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Nippold, F., Doucouliagos, H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Otte, W. M., Sladekova, M., Deresssa, T. K., Bruns, S. B., Fanelli, D., and Stanley, T. D.: Footprint of Publication Selection Bias on Meta-Analyses in Medicine, Environmental Sciences, Psychology, and Economics, Res. Synth. Meth., 15, 500–511, https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1703, 2024. a, b

Becker, T.: Fixing the Water and Energy Budget Imbalances in ECMWF's Integrated Forecasting System (IFS), nextGEMS Blog, https://nextgems-h2020.eu/fixing-the-water-and-energy-budget-imbalances-in-ecmwfs-integrated-forecasting-system- ifs/ (last access: 19 August 2026), 2022. a

Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., and Hrachowitz, M.: A Precipitation Shift from Snow towards Rain Leads to a Decrease in Streamflow, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 583–586, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246, 2014. a

Bespalov, A., Steckler, T., and Skolnick, P.: Be Positive about Negatives – Recommendations for the Publication of Negative (or Null) Results, Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol., 29, 1312–1320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.10.007, 2019. a

Blanchard, E. and Dũng, L. T.: Papers Have Bugs – What Is to Be Done?, Undone Computer Science Conference, https://www.koliaza.com/assets/files/blanchard-2024-bugs.pdf (last access: 19 August 2026), 2024. a, b

Blume, T., van Meerveld, I., and Weiler, M.: The Role of Experimental Work in Hydrological Sciences – Insights from a Community Survey, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 62, 334–337, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1230675, 2017. a

Blume, T., van Meerveld, I., and Weiler, M.: Why and When It Is Useful to Publish and Share Inconclusive Results and Failures: Reply to “Reporting Negative Results to Stimulate Experimental Hydrology”, Hydrol. Sci. J., 63, 1273–1274, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1493204, 2018. a

Brazil, R.: Illuminating “the Ugly Side of Science”: Fresh Incentives for Reporting Negative Results, Nature, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01389-7, 2024. a, b

Bruins, G. J. and Scholte, J. G. J.: Felix Andries Vening Meinesz, 1887–1966, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 294–308, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.1967.0015, 1967. a

Brunner, L. and Voigt, A.: Pitfalls in Diagnosing Temperature Extremes, Nat. Commun., 15, 2087, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46349-x, 2024. a, b

Buiter, S., Le Pourhiet, L., and Thieulot, C.: The Gallery of Failed Models and Negative Results, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/session/20589 (last access: 19 August 2026), 2016. a

Chambers, C.: What's next for Registered Reports?, Nature, 573, 187–189, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6, 2019. a

Chambers, C. D.: Instead of “Playing the Game” It Is Time to Change the Rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and Beyond, AIMS Neurosci., 1, https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.4, 2014. a

Chen, J., Su, Y., Li, Z., Ma, Z., and Shen, X.: Stripe Patterns in Wind Forecasts Induced by Physics-Dynamics Coupling on a Staggered Grid in CMA-GFS 3.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8253–8267, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8253-2025, 2025. a

Cranford, S.: Want for Nothing, Need for Null, Useful Output from Negative Results, Matter, 7, 1679–1683, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.04.005, 2024. a

Curry, S., Mercado-Lara, E., Arechavala-Gomeza, V., Begley, C. G., Bernard, C., Bernard, R., Bertuzzi, S., Bhalla, N., Bowers, D., Brod, S., Chambers, C., Dougherty, M. R., Bueso, Y. F., Forner, S., Freeman, A. L. J., Haas, M., Henderson, D. P., Khanna, K., Lawrence, R., Liakath-Ali, K., Liu, C., Malhotra, N., Merino, J. G., Miguel, E., Miles, R., Munson, M., Nakagawa, S., Nobles, R., Owango, J., Pham, M. T., Poe, G., Ramirez, A. N., Sarabipour, S., Silverman, J. L., Smith, L. N., Sriramarao, P., Sternberg, P. W., Swamy, G. K., Tansey, M. G., Torres, G. E., Turner, E. H., von Klinggraeff, L., and Weis-Garcia, F.: Ending Publication Bias: A Values-Based Approach to Surface Null and Negative Results, PLOS Biol., 23, e3003368, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003368, 2025. a, b

Devine, S., Perpinya, M. B., Delrue, V., Gaillard, S., Jorna, T. F. K., and Visser, J.: Science Fails. Let's Publish, J. Trial Error, 1, https://doi.org/10.36850/ed1, 2020. a, b, c, d

Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Elm, E. V., Gamble, C., Ghersi, D., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Simes, J., and Williamson, P. R.: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias, PLOS ONE, 3, e3081, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081, 2008. a

East, A. E., Warrick, J. A., Li, D., Sankey, J. B., Redsteer, M. H., Gibbs, A. E., Coe, J. A., and Barnard, P. L.: Measuring and Attributing Sedimentary and Geomorphic Responses to Modern Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities, Earth's Future, 10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002983, 2022. a

Echevarría, L., Malerba, A., and Arechavala-Gomeza, V.: Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing “Negative” Results and Open Access, Nucl. Acid Therapeut., 31, 185–189, https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2020.0865, 2021. a

Emery, C., O'Donnel, C., and Dhand, R.: The State of Null Results – Insights from 11,000 Researchers on Negative or Inconclusive Results, White paper, Springer Nature, https://stories.springernature.com/the-state-of-null-results-white-paper/index.html (last access: 19 August 2026), 2025. a, b, c, d, e, f

Ervens, B., Carslaw, K. S., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Review of interactive open-access publishing with community-based open peer review for improved scientific discourse and quality assurance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13903–13952, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13903-2025, 2025. a, b, c, d

Fanelli, D.: Negative Results Are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries, Scientometrics, 90, 891–904, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7, 2012. a

Fanelli, D.: Positive Results Receive More Citations, but Only in Some Disciplines, Scientometrics, 94, 701–709, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0757-y, 2013. a

Feakins, S.: My Oh Miocene!, RealClimate, https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2012/07/my-oh-miocene/ (last access: 19 August 2026), 2012. a

Feakins, S. J., Warny, S., and Lee, J.-E.: Hydrologic Cycling over Antarctica during the Middle Miocene Warming, Nat. Geosci., 5, 557–560, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1498, 2012. a

Hagenbeek, G. W., van Emmerik, T. H., Jia, T., Khamdahsag, P., Boonma, K., Taormina, R., Mani, T., and Rußwurm, M.: Exploring transferability of plastic-water hyacinth interaction and detection in rivers, Iscience, 29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.116238, 2026. a

Hall, C. A., Saia, S. M., Popp, A. L., Dogulu, N., Schymanski, S. J., Drost, N., van Emmerik, T., and Hut, R.: A Hydrologist's Guide to Open Science, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022. a

Hannah, W., Pressel, K., Ovchinnikov, M., and Elsaesser, G.: Checkerboard Patterns in E3SMv2 and E3SM-MMFv2, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6243–6257, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6243-2022, 2022. a

Hartmann, A. and Rath, V.: Uncertainties and Shortcomings of Ground Surface Temperature Histories Derived from Inversion of Temperature Logs, J. Geophys. Eng., 2, 299–311, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/2/4/S02, 2005. a

Hauk, R., van Emmerik, T. H. M., van der Ploeg, M., de Winter, W., Boonstra, M., Löhr, A. J., and Teuling, A. J.: Macroplastic Deposition and Flushing in the Meuse River Following the July 2021 European Floods, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 124025, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0768, 2023. a

Kepes, S., Banks, G. C., and Oh, I.-S.: Avoiding Bias in Publication Bias Research: The Value of “Null” Findings, J. Business Psychol., 29, 183–203, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9279-0, 2014. a

Kozlov, M.: So You Got a Null Result. Will Anyone Publish It?, Nature, 631, 728–730, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02383-9, 2024. a

Le Pourhiet, L., Buiter, S., and Thieulot, C.: Learning from Failed Models and Negative Results, EGU General Assembly, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/posters/27137 (last access: 19 August 2026, 2018. a

Liaw, K.-L., Khomik, M., and Arain, M. A.: Explaining the Shortcomings of Log-Transforming the Dependent Variable in Regression Models and Recommending a Better Alternative: Evidence From Soil CO₂ Emission Studies, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 126, e2021JG006238, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006238, 2021. a

Lofty, J., Rebai, D., Valero, D., and Franca, M.: The Shapes and Sizes of Macroplastics and Other Litter in Rivers, Earth ArXive, https://doi.org/10.31223/X5RX6T, 2025. a

Mack, C.: In Praise of the Null Result, J. Micro/Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, 13, 030101, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.13.3.030101, 2014. a

Makin, T. R. and Orban de Xivry, J.-J.: Ten Common Statistical Mistakes to Watch out for When Writing or Reviewing a Manuscript, eLife, 8, e48175, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48175, 2019. a

Melsen, L. A., Puy, A., Torfs, P. J., and Saltelli, A.: The Rise of the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency in Hydrology, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 70, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2475105, 2025. a

Menard, C. B., Essery, R., Krinner, G., Arduini, G., Bartlett, P., Boone, A., Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Burke, E., Cuntz, M., Dai, Y., Decharme, B., Dutra, E., Fang, X., Fierz, C., Gusev, Y., Hagemann, S., Haverd, V., Kim, H., Lafaysse, M., Marke, T., Nasonova, O., Nitta, T., Niwano, M., Pomeroy, J., Schädler, G., Semenov, V. A., Smirnova, T., Strasser, U., Swenson, S., Turkov, D., Wever, N., and Yuan, H.: Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E61–E79, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0329.1, 2021. a

Menard, C. B., Rasmus, S., Merkouriadi, I., Balsamo, G., Bartsch, A., Derksen, C., Domine, F., Dumont, M., Ehrich, D., Essery, R., Forbes, B. C., Krinner, G., Lawrence, D., Liston, G., Matthes, H., Rutter, N., Sandells, M., Schneebeli, M., and Stark, S.: Exploring the Decision-Making Process in Model Development: Focus on the Arctic Snowpack, The Cryosphere, 18, 4671–4686, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4671-2024, 2024. a

Merali, Z.: Computational Science: … Error, Nature, 467, 775–777, https://doi.org/10.1038/467775a, 2010. a

Merton, R. K. and Barber, E.: The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-12630-2, 2006. a

Mielewczik, M. and Moll, J.: Spinach in Blunderland: How the Myth That Spinach Is Rich in Iron Became an Urban Academic Legend, Ann. Hist. Philos. Biol., 21, https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2018-1125, 2016. a

Miller, G.: A Scientist's Nightmare: Software Problem Leads to Five Retractions, Science, 314, 1856–1857, 2006. a

Mueck, L.: Report the Awful Truth!, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8, 693–695, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.204, 2013. a

Muradchanian, J., Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., and van Ravenzwaaij, D.: The Role of Results in Deciding to Publish: A Direct Comparison across Authors, Reviewers, and Editors Based on an Online Survey, PLOS ONE, 18, e0292279, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292279, 2023. a

Neher, A.: Probability Pyramiding, Research Error and the Need for Independent Replication, Psycholog. Rec., 17, 257–262, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393713, 1967. a

Nissen, S. B., Magidson, T., Gross, K., and Bergstrom, C. T.: Publication Bias and the Canonization of False Facts, eLife, 5, e21451, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21451, 2016. a

Nosek, B. A. and Lakens, D.: Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results, Social Psychol., 45, 137–141, https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192, 2014. a

Perez-Diaz, L.: Poster Safaris, Wildcard Talks, and Other EGU25 Adventures, EGU Blog GeoLog, https://blogs.egu.eu/geolog/2025/04/29/poster-safaris-wildcard-talks-and-other-egu25-adventures/ (last access: 19 August 2026), 2025. a

Pfister, L., Fenicia, F., and Matgen, P.: Progress in Hydrological Sciences: What Do We Learn from Our Mistakes?, EGU General Assembly, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2009/session/422 (last access: 19 August 2026), 2009. a

Pipitone, J. and Easterbrook, S.: Assessing climate model software quality: a defect density analysis of three models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1009–1022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1009-2012, 2012. a

PLOS: The Missing Pieces: A Collection of Negative, Null and Inconclusive Results, https://collections.plos.org/collection/missing-pieces/ (last access: 12 February 2026), 2020. a

PLOS Collections: Positively Negative: A New PLOS ONE Collection Focusing on Negative, Null and Inconclusive Results, https://collectionsblog.plos.org/positively-negative-new-plos-one-collection-focusing-negative-null-inconclusive-results- everyone/ (last access: 19 August 2026), 2015. a

Prior-Jones, M. R., Craw, L., Hawkins, J. D., Bagshaw, E. A., Carpenter, P., Nylen, T. H., and Pettit, J.: Solar Regulators for Polar Instrumentation: Why Night Consumption Matters, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Meth. Data Syst., 14, 503–512, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-503-2025, 2025. a

Proske, U. and Melsen, L. A.: How Climate Model Developers Deal With Bugs, Earth's Future, 13, e2025EF006318, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006318, 2025. a, b

Proske, U., Brüggemann, N., Gärtner, J. P., Gutjahr, O., Haak, H., Putrasahan, D., and Wieners, K.-H.: A case for open communication of bugs in climate models, made with ICON version 2024.01, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3493, 2024. a, b

Proske, U., Le Pourhiet, L., Klotz, D., Fuji, N., and Pyschik, J.: BUGS: Blunders, Unexpected Glitches, and Surprises (Session EOS4.8), EGU General Assembly, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU25/session/52496 (last access: 19 August 2026), 2025. a

Randall, K., Ewing, E. T., Marr, L. C., Jimenez, J. L., and Bourouiba, L.: How did we get here: What are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases, Interface Focus, 11, 20210049, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0049, 2021. a

Santiago Vispo, N.: Redefining Scientific Success: How Null Results Foster Open Research, Bionatura J., 2, https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2025.02.03.1, 2025. a

Schreyers, L. J., van Emmerik, T. H., Bui, T.-K. L., Biermann, L., Uijlenhoet, R., Nguyen, H. Q., Wallerstein, N., and van der Ploeg, M.: Water hyacinths retain river plastics, Environ. Pollut., 356, 124118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124118, 2024. a

Schwartz, M. A.: The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research, J. Cell Sci., 121, 1771–1771, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.033340, 2008. a

Schweinfurth, M. K. and Frommen, J. G.: Beyond the Null: Recognizing and Reporting True Negative Findings, iScience, 28, 111676, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111676, 2025. a

Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Roderick, M. L.: Little Change in Global Drought over the Past 60 Years, Nature, 491, 435–438, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11575, 2012. a

Soergel, D. A. W.: Rampant Software Errors May Undermine Scientific Results, F1000 Research, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5930.2, 2015. a

Springer Nature: Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, https://link.springer.com/journal/12952/articles (last access: 13 February 2026), 2017. a

Strieth-Kalthoff, F., Sandfort, F., Kühnemund, M., Schäfer, F. R., Kuchen, H., and Glorius, F.: Machine Learning for Chemical Reactivity: The Importance of Failed Experiments, Comput. Chem., 61, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202204647, 2022. a

Thieulot, C., Buiter, S., and Le Pourhiet, L.: Learning from Failed Models and Negative Results, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2017/posters/23644 (last access: 19 August 2026), 2017. a

van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Nuijten, M. B., and Wicherts, J. M.: Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results, PLOS ONE, 9, e84896, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084896, 2014. a

van Belzen, J.: Ragworms Anecdotes, J. Trial Error, https://doi.org/10.36850/d17f-489b, 2024. a

van Bijsterveldt, C. E. J., Herman, P. M. J., van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Ramadhani, S., Heuts, T. S., van Starrenburg, C., Tas, S. A. J., Triyanti, A., Helmi, M., Tonneijck, F. H., and Bouma, T. J.: Subsidence Reveals Potential Impacts of Future Sea Level Rise on Inhabited Mangrove Coasts, Nat. Sustain., 6, 1565–1577, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01226-1, 2023. a

van Emmerik, T., Müller-Thomy, H., Bartens, A., and Pohle, I.: Hydrology Pop-Ups: Sharing Failures, Lessons Learned and New Ideas, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/pico/21034 (last access: 19 August 2026), 2016. a

van Emmerik, T., Popp, A., Solcerova, A., Müller, H., and Hut, R.: Reporting Negative Results to Stimulate Experimental Hydrology: Discussion of “The Role of Experimental Work in Hydrological Sciences – Insights from a Community Survey”, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 1269–1272, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1493203, 2018. a, b, c, d

van Emmerik, T., Strady, E., Kieu-Le, T.-C., Nguyen, L., and Gratiot, N.: Seasonality of riverine macroplastic transport, Sci. Rep., 9, 13549, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50096-1, 2019. a

Vening-Meinesz, F. A.: Gravity Expeditions at Sea 1923–1938, Publication of the Netherlands Geodetic Commission IV, 233 pp., https://doi.org/10.1038/132586a0, 1948. a

Warny, S., Askin, R. A., Hannah, M. J., Mohr, B. A., Raine, J. I., Harwood, D. M., Florindo, F., and the SMS Science Team: Palynomorphs from a Sediment Core Reveal a Sudden Remarkably Warm Antarctica during the Middle Miocene, Geology, 37, 955–958, https://doi.org/10.1130/G30139A.1, 2009. a

Wilby, R. L., Clifford, N. J., De Luca, P., Harrigan, S., Hillier, J. K., Hodgkins, R., Johnson, M. F., Matthews, T. K., Murphy, C., Noone, S. J., Parry, S., Prudhomme, C., Rice, S. P., Slater, L. J., Smith, K. A., and Wood, P. J.: The “Dirty Dozen” of Freshwater Science: Detecting Then Reconciling Hydrological Data Biases and Errors, WIREs Water, 4, e1209, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1209, 2017.  a, b, c

Yaqub, O.: Serendipity: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory, Res. Policy, 47, 169–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007, 2018. a

Zhu, Z., van Belzen, J., Hong, T., Kunihiro, T., Ysebaert, T., Herman, P. M. J., and Bouma, T. J.: Sprouting as a Gardening Strategy to Obtain Superior Supplementary Food: Evidence from a Seed-Caching Marine Worm, Ecology, 97, 3278–3284, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1613, 2016. a