On Tuesday, July 21, 2026, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) held a public workshop to discuss development of the regulatory framework for its greenhouse gas reporting ...
On Wednesday, June 24, CARB issued a notice announcing a three-month delay to the inaugural SB 253 reporting deadline for Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions, citing a need to give reporting entities more time following formal adoption of CARB’s initial regulation and a need to “clarify” certain requirements in the regulation (see our previous article here).
No update on substance of pending clarificationsDuring yesterday’s workshop, CARB reiterated the rationale for the delayed inaugural SB 253 reporting deadline: providing additional time and greater clarity. Unfortunately, and to several commenters’ chagrin, CARB provided no further details on what specific clarifications CARB may incorporate into the inaugural reporting rulemaking. In response to several questions, CARB merely referred to its June 24 notice, stated it cannot provide more information, and indicated it will issue a public notice on the amended initial regulation. Regardless of the clarifications CARB ultimately makes, OAL must still approve the regulation.
Forthcoming guidance for inaugural SB 253 reportingCARB announced that, by September 1, 2026, it intends to publish additional guidance to assist reporting entities with their inaugural Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions report ahead of the anticipated November 10, 2026, deadline (see July 21, 2025, Presentation, Slide 7). This guidance will include (1) a voluntary online intake platform for fee contact information and GHG emissions reporting, and (2) accompanying guidance and an instructional video. Staff noted that the voluntary online intake form is intended to streamline reporting entity submissions and submission of fee information.
No change to content of 2026 reportsIn response to several questions regarding the inaugural 2026 report, staff repeatedly pointed to CARB’s December 5, 2024, enforcement notice, which provides that, “for the first report due in 2026, reporting entities may submit scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from ‘the reporting entity’s prior fiscal year’ that can be determined from information the reporting entity already possesse[d] or [wa]s already collecting at the time th[e] Notice was issued.” Staff also reiterated that CARB’s previously published reporting template is intended solely as a voluntary resource and is not a required submission format.
2027 reporting: CARB previews draft language and frameworkCARB devoted most of the workshop to previewing the regulatory concepts that staff is developing for anticipated publication as part of a rulemaking package in Q4 2026.
Emphasis on leveraging existing standards and interoperabilitySB 253 requires reporting entities to disclose GHG emissions information in conformance with the GHG-P. To minimize the burden on reporting entities, CARB emphasized its intention to leverage existing GHG accounting standards rather than create a California-specific framework.
Staff noted that many stakeholders have requested interoperability with other climate disclosure programs and stated that CARB intends to align its reporting requirements with established reporting practices where possible. To that end, CARB stated that it “does not want to reinvent the wheel with this program and would like to leverage the experience that many reporting entities already have with voluntary or mandatory climate disclosures.”
Proposed regulatory framework for 2027 rulemakingCARB broadly categorized the regulatory concepts being evaluated for its rulemaking into three buckets: (1) GHG-P requirements, (2) GHG-P recommendations, and (3) California-specific clarifications intended to address issues unique to California’s regulatory context. See CARB’s Presentation at Slides 8 to 40 for a complete breakdown of proposed requirements.
In most cases, CARB proposes language that will implement the required reporting approach prescribed by the GHG-P but, in some cases, proposed language implements GHG-P recommendations (e.g., measurement uncertainty reporting) or is intended to provide clarity for the California regulatory context (e.g., defining key terms with reference to applicable California regulations).
Proposed general requirements for GHG reportingCARB reviewed a series of proposed greenhouse gas reporting requirements it intends to address, including:
For additional details on CARB’s proposed general requirements, see Slides 11-24 of CARB’s July 21, 2026, Presentation.
Proposed Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions reporting requirementsCARB also ran through proposed emissions reporting requirements for Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions (see July 21, 2025, Presentation, Slides 25-34).
With respect to Scope 2 emissions, CARB is proposing to implement GHG-P requirements verbatim. As for Scope 3 emissions, CARB is proposing a category phase-in. If adopted, this approach would mean that reporting entities would be required to provide data for the five most commonly reported categories of Scope 3 emissions beginning in 2027: (1) purchased goods and services, (2) fuel and energy-related activities, (3) waste generated during operations, (4) business travel, and (5) employee commuting. Staff noted that these categories have some of the most established data sources and quantification methods. In the inaugural year of Scope 3 reporting – 2027 – disclosing data on the remaining (ten) categories would be voluntary. Presumably these remaining Scope 3 categories would be affirmatively phased in for mandatory reporting in future years.
ExemptionsCARB’s initial regulation exempted insurance companies from 2026 reporting in an effort to avoid duplication with reporting required by the California Department of Insurance (“CDI”). Beginning in 2027, CARB is proposing that insurance companies are no longer exempt; rather, insurance companies will need to submit the same report to satisfy both CDI and SB 253. Furthermore, CARB is proposing if a CDI report does not address all of CARB’s requirements, then insurance companies must supplement the CDI report.
Looking forwardCARB has a busy regulatory agenda as we head towards the fourth quarter of 2026:
The broad range of expertise at Hogan Lovells US LLP—including the Environment and Natural Resources, Litigation/Consumer Products, Sustainable Finance and Investment, Corporate and Finance, and Infrastructure, Energy, Resources and Projects teams—are available to assist clients with complying with California’s climate-related financial risk and GHG emissions disclosure requirements and can help you understand interactions with other relevant sustainability-related reporting regimes required globally.
Authored by Tom Boer, Maia Jorgensen, and Allison Klei.