ILRC Comment Opposing the Proposed Rule Limiting Work Authorization for Asylum Seekers
Asylum
Policy Advocacy
cbrown
Tue, 04/28/2026 - 08:33
Publication Date
Apr 24, 2026
Share
On April 23, 2026, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) submitted a comment opposing a proposed rule that would significantly limit work authorization for asylum seekers. The ILRC comments that the rule would drastically restrict access to work permits and make it nearly impossible for many asylum seekers to survive while their cases are pending. It highlights that the proposal would lengthen wait times, add new eligibility barriers, and allow broad discretionary denials, effectively undermining the asylum system and deterring legitimate applicants. The ILRC contends the rule would cause severe economic, social, and health harms, including lost wages, increased exploitation, family instability, and reduced access to legal representation and basic services, while also disproportionately harming immigrants of color. Additionally, the ILRC criticizes related form changes as unlawful and overly burdensome, concluding that the proposal lacks evidence to support its stated goals and urging DHS and USCIS to withdraw it entirely.
Downloads
File
Asylum-EAD-Comment.pdf
Audience
Practitioners
On April 23, 2026, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) submitted a comment opposing a proposed rule that would significantly limit work authorization for asylum seekers. The ILRC comments that the rule would drastically restrict access to work permits and make it nearly impossible for many asylum seekers to survive while their cases are pending. It highlights that the proposal would lengthen wait times, add new eligibility barriers, and allow broad discretionary denials, effectively undermining the asylum system and deterring legitimate applicants. The ILRC contends the rule would cause severe economic, social, and health harms, including lost wages, increased exploitation, family instability, and reduced access to legal representation and basic services, while also disproportionately harming immigrants of color. Additionally, the ILRC criticizes related form changes as unlawful and overly burdensome, concluding that the proposal lacks evidence to support its stated goals and urging DHS and USCIS to withdraw it entirely.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ILRC Submits Comment Opposing Proposed Rule to Restrict Work Permits | 0 | 14.54 | 07-08-2026 |
| 2 | Comment Opposing Proposed Changes to the Board of Immigration Appeals | 0 | 14.92 | 07-08-2026 |
| 3 | ILRC Comment Opposing Fee Increase for Individuals Removed in Absentia | 0 | 13.33 | 24-06-2026 |
| 4 | ILRC Comment Opposing Interim Final Rule regarding Signatures for Immigration Benefit Requests | 0 | 14.54 | 09-07-2026 |
| 5 | ILRC Comment Opposing Form EOIR-33 Proposed Changes | 0 | 14.54 | 05-05-2026 |
| 6 | ILRC Comment Opposing Proposed USCIS Change of Address Form | 0 | 13.76 | 24-06-2026 |
| 7 | ILRC Comment Opposing the Proposed Fee Increase for Form I-246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal | 0 | 12.53 | 07-07-2026 |
| 8 | New BIA Procedural Rules: What's in Effect and What's Not | 0 | 14.34 | 26-06-2026 |
| 9 | USCIS Adjustment of Status Memo: ILRC Quick Take and Tips for Legal Practitioners | 0 | 13.2 | 02-06-2026 |
| 10 | Critical New Changes to the Immigration Appeals Process | 0 | 14.26 | 10-02-2026 |