The court dismissed this nonpayment proceeding for a defective rent demand. After the tenant's Section 8 subsidy was terminated, the landlord sought rent amounts attributable to the Section 8 portion even though the tenant had not signed rent-stabilized renewal leases after termination of the subsidy. The court held that the tenant cannot be held responsible for the Section 8 portion of the rent absent a new agreement following subsidy termination.
Section 8 voucher
Civil Court of the City of New York
Bronx County (Bronx)
LT-327061-25/BX
West Farms Preservation LLC
Arelis Francisco; Paul Lozada
Gonzalez, Alberto M.
2026-07-28
Pre-Answer Motion by Tenant
Case Dismissed/discontinued
Tenant Substantially Won
The court dismissed this nonpayment proceeding for a defective rent demand. After the tenant's Section 8 subsidy was terminated, the landlord sought rent amounts attributable to the Section 8 portion even though the tenant had not signed rent-stabilized renewal leases after termination of the subsidy. The court held that the tenant cannot be held responsible for the Section 8 portion of the rent absent a new agreement following subsidy termination.
Defective Rent Demand; Section 8 Voucher; Tenant Not Responsible For Section 8 Portion Of Rent Absent New Agreement After Termination Of Subsidy
"West Farms Preservation LLC v. Francisco" (2026). All Decisions. 2346.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2346
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavallo v. Cabral | 0 | 7.82 | 05-08-2026 |
| 2 | Javaid v. 1129 59 Lofts LLC | 0 | 9.59 | 05-08-2026 |
| 3 | 1770 Dean Inc v. Paul-Sommerville | 0 | 6.56 | 05-08-2026 |
| 4 | Department of Housing Preservation and Development v. 2500 Bedford LLC | 0 | 10.1 | 05-08-2026 |
| 5 | Yun Hoe Wong v. Wong | 0 | 10.26 | 05-08-2026 |
| 6 | 1627-1635 Amsterdam Ave. LLC v. Wolfe | 0 | 6.1 | 05-08-2026 |
| 7 | Chun Ying Zhang v. Liya Wang | 0 | 8.65 | 05-08-2026 |
| 8 | GVS Props. III, LLC v. Cruz | 0 | 5.16 | 05-08-2026 |
| 9 | Fabo v. 89 Hicks St., LLC | 0 | 6.58 | 05-08-2026 |
| 10 | Concern Pitkin, LLC v. Crosland | 0 | 8 | 05-08-2026 |