Obviously whoever is preparing these releases is doing their best to NOT actually comply.

Comply with what, exactly? As far as I know, there is no legal instrument that specifically defines responsive materials, nor any programmatic appropriation for disbursing resources to operationalize the President's so-called directive. To me, it seems more likely that, when faced with a poorly defined, unfunded mandate of such an expansive scope, the departments and agencies of the federal government are protecting their core statutory missions by providing the minimum viable response that meets the interpreted intent of the executive.

In my view, if the White House cared about this issue to an extent that went beyond soliciting attention on a topic of significant public curiosity, it would advocate for the establishment of a permanent program via the President's Budget Request. Oddly, such a request is absent from the most recent PBR, which, incidentally, clocks in at $1.5 trillion for the Department of War (inclusive of a supplemental request to offset costs associated with the conflict in Iran). What might we learn from that fact? This is a political exercise and public relations effort, not a substantive operational policy.