Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Defining trust helps robots behave

Дата публикации: 07-12-2017 12:00:00

An important step in making sure that robots act safely and effectively in our society is to be able to formally express what trust is in a human-robot partnership

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Posted: 7th December 2017

An important step in making sure that robots act safely and effectively in our society is to be able to formally express what trust is in a human-robot partnership. The University of Oxford is working on how to express the properties of trust, writes researcher Morteza Lahijanian.

Robots are becoming members of our society, which consists of convoluted social rules, relationships and expectations. Complex algorithms have rendered robots increasingly sophisticated machines with rising levels of autonomy, enabling them to leave behind their traditionally simple work places in factories for a more complicated world. Driverless cars, home assistive robots, and unmanned aerial vehicles are just a few examples.

As the level of involvement of such systems increases in our daily lives, their decisions affect us more directly. We instinctively expect robots to behave morally and make ethical decisions. For instance, we expect a firefighter robot to follow ethical principles when it is faced with a choice of saving one person's life over another in a rescue mission, and we expect an eldercare robot to take a moral stance in following the instructions of its owner when they are in conflict with the interest of others. Spoiler alert: This is in conflict with the robot in the movie 'Robot & Frank' which partakes in a robbery with Frank, its owner, to achieve its goal: Frank's wellbeing.

Such expectations give rise to the notion of trust in the context of human-robot relationships and to questions such as 'how can I trust a driverless car to take my child to school?' and 'how can I trust a robot to help my elderly parent?' Failing to answer such questions appropriately can cause a major blow to the field of robotics or, more generally, autonomous systems.

In order to design algorithms that can generate trustworthy decisions and hence an ethically reliable system, we need to understand, formalise and express trust. This is a challenging task because it involves many aspects including sociology, psychology, cognitive reasoning, philosophy, logic and computation. Researcher Morteza Lahijanian

We believe formal methods, specifically quantitative verification and synthesis, can provide a venue to approach the above questions. In recent years, these methods have been receiving a lot of attention in the robotics community and have been explicitly adapted to provide guarantees for the safety and correctness of robot behaviours.

We have begun a thorough investigation into formalisation of trust and expressing its properties with the aid of collaborators in the philosophy and human factors communities as part of an ESPRC-sponsored project. It is a collaboration between the Oxford Robotics Institute and our department entitled 'Mobile Autonomy Programme Grant: Enabling a Pervasive Technology of the Future', which runs from March 2015 to February 2020. Professor Marta Kwiatkowska is leading the Safety, Trust and Integrity theme within the project (goo.gl/uBZctr), working with Research Associate Wenjie Ruan and me. New DPhil student Maciej Olejnik is also joining the project.

The vision of the project is to create, run and exploit the world’s leading research programme in mobile autonomy, addressing fundamental technical issues, which impede large-scale commercial and societal adoption of mobile robotics. Understanding trust and being able to evaluate it to inform trust-based decision-making and reliance on mobile robots is key to their widespread adoption. We have organised two workshops on the topic, and the third one will be at FLoC in Oxford. More information: goo.gl/NAkCgL

The study of trust is a cross-disciplinary challenge creating central research topics, notably from the formalisation angle. The immediate technical research questions are how to quantify trust and how to model its evolution. Another key question is how to design a logic that allows the expression of specifications involving trust. From the verification perspective, the questions are how to verify (reason about) such specifications in the context of a given partnership or, even more prominent, how to synthesise (design) an autonomous system such that, in a partnership with a human, these specifications are guaranteed.

In our research group, we have started taking initial steps in investigating these questions and believe that, only by a thorough study of them, one day, we may be able to guarantee the success of robots in our society.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1A humanoid robot's social expressiveness may backfire when it makes mistakes09.5628-08-2026
2AI's usefulness depends on whether we can trust it to act alone0501-07-2026
3An AI-Powered Control System For Robots With Legs025.3806-07-2026
4Future-aware AI doubles robot speed in pick-and-place tasks014.2828-07-2026
5Социолог спрогнозировал новые роли роботов в жизни людей0509-07-2026
6Attitudes toward autonomous service robots at real-life events reveal social behaviors06.9722-07-2026
7How to Beat China and Make AI Safe01027-07-2026
8New study on dangers of overly agreeable AI bots says, AI is choosing flattery over facts08.8426-03-2026
9В Совфеде разработали законопроект, описывающий взаимоотношения робота и человека в РФ0020-12-2021
10The Future of Agentic AI Depends on Openness and Trust. That’s Why Docker Is Joining Nvidia’s Open Secure AI Alliance.0530-07-2026

Классификация: Наука. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 9.2. Источник: www.cs.ox.ac.uk.