Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
СпутникиРНSpaceXРоскосмосNASAIn a 14-page opinion, Judge Colleen Lawless reached the same conclusion as judges in 18 other federal districts and one appellate circuit who have ruled in nearly identical cases. She found that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not give the U.S. attorney general “general auditing power” to demand voter data. No court has yet ruled in favor of the administration’s demand for voter data.
In a 14-page opinion, Judge Colleen Lawless reached the same conclusion as judges in 18 other federal districts and one appellate circuit who have ruled in nearly identical cases. She found that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not give the U.S. attorney general “general auditing power” to demand voter data. No court has yet ruled in favor of the administration’s demand for voter data.
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Media Scrutiny
5 days ago
“Judge Colleen Lawless” = Biden Appointee. :-/
The Railroader
6 days ago
Note to the appropriately named Ms. Lawless and 18 other activists masquerading as judges:
What are these voter rolls for? Just to occupy space? To check a box?
If not auditable, this information is as worthless as the NIU law school the lawless Ms. Lawless allegedly graduated from.
SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER
FOLLOW US
WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES
WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.
SEARCH ALL HISTORY
CONTACT / TERMS OF USE