Updates urgently needed. | In our test, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 impressed with its high-quality hinge, sharp displays, and improved battery life. However, its older technology, camera compromises, and higher price raise the question: Is that enough for a premium foldable?
Motorola’s flip phone offers only minor improvements over its predecessor: While there are noticeable changes in battery life, otherwise Motorola is essentially selling the same flip phone as last year. Even the materials used on the back were already featured in last year’s model.
Furthermore, this year’s model still requires compromises compared to high-end phones: While the processor is fast, it’s no longer state-of-the-art. The cameras are only average in terms of image sharpness and zoom capability, and the USB 2.0 port is a shortcoming given the price.
Motorola has made improvements regarding overheating issues: In our test, the Snapdragon 8 Elite no longer causes the device to reach quite as high of temperatures. The build quality, as well as the hinge—which offers just the right amount of resistance—continue to impress in our testing.
The phone charges quickly, has sufficient battery life, and offers plenty of RAM. However, the price has risen again, making the Razr Ultra 2026 (Razr 70 Ultra) an expensive choice.
+ high-quality hinge
+ bright, color-accurate 165-Hz OLEDs
+ improved battery life
+ fast charging and wireless charging
+ high performance
+ less heat buildup under load
+ Wi-Fi 7 with good reception
- The price has gone up again
- Hardly any new features compared to the previous model
- Older processor
- Camera sharpness and zoom are only average
- Outdated USB 2.0 port
- Uncertain update situation
- PWM flickering on both displays
Motorola is asking around US$ 1,500 for the Razr Ultra 2026, for example at amazon.com.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Unlocked | Made for US 16/512GB | 50MP Camera | Pantone Orient Blue
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8c/8t, 3 x , 2 x 4.3 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 2 Prime, 6 x 3.5 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 2 Performance, Oryon v2
Display
6.96 inch 22:9, 2992 x 1224 pixel 462 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Cover display: 4.0 inches, AMOLED, 1272x1080, Gorilla Glass Ceramic, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 171.5 x 74 ( = 0.28 x 6.75 x 2.91 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 68W wired charging, 30W wireless charging, 5W wired reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase shift AF, OIS, LED flash, Videos @4320p/30fps (camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.0, wide angle (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0, Videos @2160p/60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP48 certified, eSIM, fanless, waterproof
Weight
199 g ( = 7.02 oz / 0.44 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
The dimensions and weight remain unchanged from the previous model, as does the clamshell design featuring a large screen on the inside and a 4-inch display on the outside. As in the previous year, Gorilla Glass Ceramic is used on the exterior. The phone is waterproof; you can even submerge it in shallow water.
There are two color options: brown with a back made of wood composite, and an Alcantara back with a dark blue pattern. The hinge is a standout feature: it opens quite easily with one hand and holds the phone securely in many positions.
Motorola is once again equipping its 2026 flip phone with 512 GB of storage and 16 GB of RAM.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Motorola Razr 70 Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 DIN A6 ❌
171.5 mm / 6.75 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 199 g0.4387 lbs171.5 mm / 6.75 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 199 g0.4387 lbs171.3 mm / 6.74 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 188 g0.4145 lbs166.9 mm / 6.57 in 73.8 mm / 2.91 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 199 g0.4387 lbs166.7 mm / 6.56 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
The WiFi 7 modem in the Razr Ultra 2026, when paired with our reference router, the Asus RT-BE96U, delivers very fast and stable transfer rates.
It supports a wide range of cellular bands, allowing you to use the phone for mobile internet almost anywhere in the world. Reception was also good during our testing.
Both displays are very responsive and offer a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz.
The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the power button, so it’s easy to reach whether the phone is open or closed. It works reliably and unlocks the phone almost instantly. Face recognition is also available and works with all cameras.
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1420 (min: 1313) MBit/s ∼70% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1788 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼81% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Wi-Fi 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1093 (min: 997) MBit/s ∼85% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1712 (min: 1621) MBit/s ∼100% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 520 (min: 309) MBit/s ∼40% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1333 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼78% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 868 (min: 438) MBit/s ∼91% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 799 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼77% |
| Motorola Razr 70 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 778 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼60% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 933 (min: 861) MBit/s ∼54% |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼87% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 2040 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 2200 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼100% |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 685 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼72% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 721 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼69% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1279 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼99% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1396 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼82% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1818 (min: 327) MBit/s ∼89% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1918 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼87% |
The software is based on Android 16 and is very close to stock Android. At the time of testing, the updates were from May 2026—so they’re already a bit older, even though Motorola actually promises updates every two months.
Security updates are scheduled to be available until February 2030—meaning just under 3 1/2 years at the time of testing. The entry in the EU’s EPREL database, however, specifies 6 years of update availability. Motorola does not interpret this to mean, however, that these updates must actually be current. Overall, the update situation is therefore uncertain.
The smartphone’s packaging does not include any plastic film.
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 features three 50-megapixel cameras. Two of them are mounted on the outside and one on the inside. Thanks to the clamshell design, you can prop the phone upright without needing a tripod. This is convenient, and you can also take selfies with the main cameras while viewing the live view on the external screen.
The image quality of the main camera is quite high, with fine details rendered accurately. Videos can be recorded in 8K at 30 fps and in 4K at up to 120 fps, allowing you to capture high-quality slow-motion footage.
The wide-angle camera takes decent panoramas, but only renders details roughly.
Selfies come out well with both cameras, but if you have the choice, you should use the main camera—it captures even more detailed images.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow LightUltra wide angle

click to load images

11.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E

8.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
Both the main screen and the external display use OLED panels, which can become very bright and offer accurate color reproduction. Both displays also provide good rendering of HDR content.
However, you’ll have to put up with PWM flicker; on the main display, this occurs at a lower frequency than on the external display, making it potentially even less suitable for people who are sensitive to it.
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1436 cd/m² (Nits) Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Center on Battery: 1436 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.22 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
103.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.148
CCT: 6342 K
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7" | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7" | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 70 AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | 6% | |||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2689 | 2635 -2% | 2777 3% | ||
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2599 | 2431 -6% | 2845 9% | ||
| Response Times | -225% | -70% | -12% | -2951% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.5 ?(0.2, 0.3) | 2.4 ?(0.9, 1.5) -380% | 1.4 ?(0.8, 0.6) -180% | 0.64 ?(0.347, 0.2975) -28% | 44 ?(1.5, 42.5) -8700% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4) | 2 ?(0.7, 1.3) -150% | 1 ?(0.5, 0.5) -25% | 1.05 ?(0.57, 0.4795) -31% | 2.2 ?(1, 1.2) -175% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 142.7 | 707 | 121 | 240 | 67 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 44 -144% | 19 -6% | 13.64 24% | 14 22% |
| Screen | 14% | -45% | -29% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1436 | 1379 -4% | 1077 -25% | 1349 -6% | 1331 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.22 | 1.05 14% | 2.11 -73% | 2.2 -80% | 1.2 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.26 | 1.79 21% | 3.62 -60% | 3.3 -46% | 2.18 4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.4 26% | 2.3 -21% | 1.6 16% | 1.8 5% |
| Gamma | 2.148 102% | 2.124 104% | 2.155 102% | 2.06 107% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6342 102% | 6362 102% | 6275 104% | 6484 100% | 6248 104% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1393 | 1036 | 1354 | 1318 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 95 | 98 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -106% / -88% | -58% / -56% | -15% / -18% | -981% / -982% |
* ... smaller is better
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1002 cd/m² (Nits) Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Center on Battery: 1002 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.37 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
89.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.215
CCT: 6480 K
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 142.7 Hz Amplitude: 18 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 142.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 142.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7741 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Series of measurements taken at a fixed zoom level and with different brightness settings (Although the amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, this is due to the scaling. The info box shows a magnified version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
The Razr Ultra 2026 (Razr 70 Ultra) is a thoroughly fast phone, even though the Snapdragon 8 Elite is no longer the latest high-end processor. However, it still has enough power even for more resource-intensive apps and demanding games.
The memory isn’t quite as fast as on high-end phones without a flip mechanism, but it still processes data very quickly.
Heat buildup under prolonged load is significantly lower than on its predecessor. Motorola has improved the cooling system, which is also evident in the significantly more stable performance metrics during stress tests.
The speakers produce decent sound, though they lack bass. All major audio codecs are supported, so you can connect speakers or headphones via Bluetooth with good sound quality.
Motorola has added a few more mAh to the battery compared to its predecessor: In our Wi-Fi test, the phone lasted about 50 minutes longer.
Charging options are comprehensive, including fast wired and wireless charging. Other devices can also be powered via cable from the smartphone.
| Geekbench 6.7 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 3084 Points +2% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=30) | 3046 Points +1% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 3011 Points |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 2987 Points -1% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 2478 Points -18% |
| Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=184, last 2 years) | 1876 Points -38% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 1108 Points -63% |
| Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 9183 Points +17% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7656 - 10401, n=30) | 9143 Points +17% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 8098 Points +3% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 7842 Points |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 7784 Points -1% |
| Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=184, last 2 years) | 5590 Points -29% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 3343 Points -57% |
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 25743 Points +5% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 24523 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (19436 - 28053, n=27) | 24409 Points 0% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 21674 Points -12% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 20027 Points -18% |
| Average of class Smartphone (271 - 30892, n=169, last 2 years) | 12688 Points -48% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 3766 Points -85% |
| Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 6538 Points +5% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 6241 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (5230 - 7094, n=27) | 6234 Points 0% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 5456 Points -13% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 5166 Points -17% |
| Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8263, n=169, last 2 years) | 3315 Points -47% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 961 Points -85% |
| Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 6593 Points +10% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (4852 - 7212, n=27) | 6213 Points +4% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 5984 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 5151 Points -14% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 4852 Points -19% |
| Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8271, n=168, last 2 years) | 3304 Points -45% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 982 Points -84% |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 120 fps +10% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 118 fps +8% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 109 fps |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 108 fps -1% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (50 - 166, n=28) | 94.6 fps -13% |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=179, last 2 years) | 61.2 fps -44% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 40 fps -63% |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (166 - 332, n=28) | 245 fps +44% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 223 fps +31% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 189 fps +11% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 171 fps +1% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 170 fps |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 378, n=179, last 2 years) | 130.7 fps -23% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 47 fps -72% |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 105 fps +11% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 96 fps +1% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 95 fps |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (45 - 144, n=28) | 83 fps -13% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 82 fps -14% |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 144, n=180, last 2 years) | 50 fps -47% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 25 fps -74% |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (58 - 118, n=28) | 95.3 fps +32% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 79 fps +10% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 77 fps +7% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 73 fps +1% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 72 fps |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 151, n=179, last 2 years) | 50.7 fps -30% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 18 fps -75% |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (26 - 53, n=28) | 44.4 fps +20% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 38 fps +3% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 37 fps |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 35 fps -5% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 33 fps -11% |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 63, n=179, last 2 years) | 23.2 fps -37% |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 7.7 fps -79% |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=118, last 2 years) | 665 Points +10% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 625 Points +3% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 605 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 602 Points 0% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (246 - 676, n=11) | 520 Points -14% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 516 Points -15% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 443 Points -27% |
| Half Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=118, last 2 years) | 2623 Points +72% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 1521 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 1475 Points -3% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 633 Points -58% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (249 - 1521, n=11) | 605 Points -60% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 505 Points -67% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 428 Points -72% |
| Quantized NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=118, last 2 years) | 3921 Points +30% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 3009 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 2966 Points -1% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (508 - 3009, n=11) | 1285 Points -57% |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 | 1274 Points -58% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 1088 Points -64% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 862 Points -71% |
| CrossMark | |
| Overall | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (661 - 2674, n=19) | 1822 Points +176% |
| Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=103, last 2 years) | 1263 Points +91% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 661 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 654 Points -1% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | Points -100% |
| Productivity | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (723 - 2084, n=19) | 1469 Points +103% |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 2366, n=103, last 2 years) | 1133 Points +57% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 723 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 714 Points -1% |
| Creativity | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (603 - 1912, n=19) | 1380 Points +129% |
| Average of class Smartphone (310 - 2123, n=103, last 2 years) | 1022 Points +69% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 603 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 586 Points -3% |
| Responsiveness | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (706 - 13042, n=19) | 7702 Points +991% |
| Average of class Smartphone (466 - 13407, n=103, last 2 years) | 4081 Points +478% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 706 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 704 Points 0% |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=18) | 217 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 216.039 Points |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=116, last 2 years) | 163.4 Points |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 112.521 Points |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 | 251.322 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (113.6 - 307, n=8) | 243 Points -3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=88, last 2 years) | 217 Points -14% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 | 209.864 Points -16% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Motorola Razr 70 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | 27% | -11% | -34% | 13% | -20% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3611.3 | 3504.7 -3% | 4083.53 13% | 4044.67 12% | 1689.2 -53% | 3708 ?(1851 - 4512, n=52) 3% | 2236 ?(270 - 4370, n=172, last 2 years) -38% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3423.9 | 3450.9 1% | 3894.12 14% | 2981.82 -13% | 1188.1 -65% | 3129 ?(1494 - 4051, n=52) -9% | 1921 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=172, last 2 years) -44% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 315.4 | 308.6 -2% | 403.94 28% | 366.98 16% | 296.7 -6% | 382 ?(204 - 512, n=52) 21% | 311 ?(47.6 - 614, n=172, last 2 years) -1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 351 | 347 -1% | 534.73 52% | 143.67 -59% | 307.6 -12% | 476 ?(45.7 - 987, n=52) 36% |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 44.1 °C = 111 F Average: 39.3 °C = 103 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 42.5 °C = 109 F Average: 37.8 °C = 100 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 40.8 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.4 % |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 46.3 % |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.6 % +15% |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 86.5 % |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 85.8 % -1% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 49 % -43% |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 99.3 % |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 81.7 % -18% |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 69.5 % -30% |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 52.2 % -47% |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 50.1 % |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99 % |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 50.7 % |
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) 5000 mAh | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4700 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 30% | -40% | -21% | |||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.7 | 0.6 14% | 0.49 30% | 1.074 ?(0.42 - 3.8, n=25) -53% | 0.879 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=134, last 2 years) -26% | ||
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.87 21% | 1.637 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=25) -49% | 1.474 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=134, last 2 years) -34% | ||
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.6 | 1.4 13% | 0.99 38% | 1.868 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=25) -17% | 1.663 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=134, last 2 years) -4% | ||
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.2 | 8.87 ?(5.8 - 13, n=19) | |||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 11.3 | 12.8 ?(8.74 - 19.5, n=19) |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 28h 46min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 16h 14min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 5h 9min |
The Razr Ultra 2026 (Razr 70 Ultra) has gotten more expensive and is slightly better. However, you still have to accept some compromises in features to pay for the clamshell mechanism.
For those who have the necessary funds, this clamshell foldable is a stylish and very well-built choice.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026)
- 07/28/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 73%
Games Performance
50 / 55 → 91%
Application Performance
77 / 85 → 90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
94.6%
Repairability
33%
Software Updates
50%
Total Sustainability Score: 46.3%
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1399€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.96" 2992x1224 462 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1299€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.00" 2992x1224 462 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $331.24 Motorola razr | 2024 | Unloc... 2. $529.97 Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | U... 3. $1,261.77 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 2520x1080 397 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 869€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1080 413 PPI AMOLED |
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1575 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009
I initially wrote about gaming laptops when I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I was then involved with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media concepts for large companies like BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. Nowadays, I focus on smartphones, tablets, and future technologies. Since 2018 I have been Managing Editor for mobile device reviews, working alongside my colleague Daniel Schmidt.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is Motorola’s book-style phone debut so successful that Samsung has reason to worry? – Razr Fold Smartphone Review | 0 | 8.59 | 02-08-2026 |
| 2 | Motorola Razr Fold review: Motorola finally has the hardware. Now it needs the experience | 2 | 8 | 03-07-2026 |
| 3 | Эта раскладушка привлекает всеобщее внимание - Обзор смартфона Motorola Razr 2026 (Razr 70) | 5 | 7 | 29-05-2026 |
| 4 | Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra launches as Samsung’s ‘most advanced’ foldable, starts at $2,099 | 0 | 11.88 | 22-07-2026 |
| 5 | ¿Vale la pena el motorola razr 70 ultra? | 0 | 11.34 | 29-07-2026 |
| 6 | The Motorola MotoPad (2026) might be the new budget tablet king | 2 | 6 | 16-07-2026 |
| 7 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Comparing Performance in the Ultra-Premium Class | 0 | 8.88 | 07-03-2026 |
| 8 | Review: The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra ticks every box, but it’s the boring option now | 0 | 8.96 | 31-07-2026 |
| 9 | The 2026 motorola razr family is here, and it’s looking good | 0 | 7.74 | 30-04-2026 |
| 10 | The Moto Razr Fold is Samsung’s wakeup call | 2 | 6 | 12-07-2026 |